As an ad based publication, such as the Stranger, certainly you guys must also be feeling the crunch?
BTW, Isn't the front cover for The Stranger basically your own ad?
If the publication is struggling (as all pubs are these days) selling front page ad space (at a premium) makes sense, kind of like Target buying every ad in the New Yorker a couple years ago.
European papers have been doing this for a long time. Slowly, lots of major metro newspapers, like the Times and PI, have added "front-of-section" advertising. So, it's not surprising that front page advertising is here to stay.
Better ads on the front page than no front page (or paper) at all. Maybe they should make the ENTIRE front page ads, frankly. Might keep them afloat a little longer.
CBS TV buys up a strip of print at the very bottom of the page and that's considered "The front page"? I'll start worrying as soon as you can see it without having to turn it over first.
When I started reading the NYT back in the 60s, there always were ads -- in agate type -- on the bottom of page 1, so this is not as shocking as you might think.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con…
BTW, Isn't the front cover for The Stranger basically your own ad?
If the publication is struggling (as all pubs are these days) selling front page ad space (at a premium) makes sense, kind of like Target buying every ad in the New Yorker a couple years ago.
That's on page 3.
They began their death spiral when their reporters realized they could "make" the news instead of report it.
People don't remember this, but there used to be corner - and sometimes half-page - ads in all major newspapers.
Congrats for bringing them back!
I think it's some sort of an isotope.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jan…
this does mark some sort of transition. where will print journalism go from here?