Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
http://protectmarriagewa.com/
Looks like the Church Lady, right?
Also, look at the numbers they put up:
""""Sponsors, a campaign group called Protect Marriage Washington, submitted 137,689 signatures. That is roughly 14 percent more than the bare minimum, 120,577, required to secure a place on the November ballot.
This is clearly good news for our side. We do, however, have a long ways to go with the count and we will need to maintain an error rate below 14% to prevail. Please keep this matter in your prayers over the weekend"'''''
They couldn't even get the math right! hahahahaha
http://www.michaelmina.net/rn74/
Drip, Drip, Drip... Throwing out as many votes as they can, slowly and meticulously so as to not raise too many suspicions.
With such criminal methods of course you'll disqualify most of the signers.
Pat yourselves on the back cause any difference that previously existed between you and regimes like the one in Iran has been greatly diminish.
keep telling
the operatives
which
you have
strategically placed, to
keep on doing the dirty
math that
they seem to be doing day by day
to disenfranchise
as
many people
as
they can.
>bongo solo<
Drip, Drip, Drip...
Throwing out
as many votes as they can,
slowly and meticulously
so
as to not raise too
many
..suspicions.
With
such
criminal
methods
of course
you'll disqualify
most
of the signers.
>skin flute solo<
Pat yourselves
on the back cause
any difference that
previously existed between
you and regimes like
the one
in Iran
has been
greatly.....
....diminish.
SNAP*SNAP*SNAP
I guess it does work, but god it was painful.
Just wow.
It's all part of the homosexual agenda to infect your kids with teh gay. We want to get into schools and church youth groups to teach proper oral sex techniques and rimming. We want your kids LOVESCHILD!! Nothing will stop us.
By the way, why do conservatives want to get rid of all gay people? It's not as if we were born via gay sex. Obviously the vast majority of LGBT's parents are straight or had straight sex. So even if you managed you get your way and eliminate all current homosexuals, new ones would be produced by straight people. The only way you can put an end to the "homosexual indentity" is to stop breeding! You fucking heterosexuals are the "problem".
Talking Points:
http://tinyurl.com/lq8qdf
"Homosexuals have a right to form meaningful relationships. They do not have a right to redefine marriage for all of us. Marriage is not a special interest!"
Reasonable...I'd say!
In CA they use a % somewhere in the 25% range. Just curious if someone has the answer.
Reminder: although prospects are looking dim for the referendum, we're not home free yet. Contact WAFST.org - Washington Families Standing Together - to see how you can help prepare for the ballot. Or heck, just send them a contribution. They've done an amazing job preparing for all contingencies.
We're not asking to "redefine marriage for all of us." We're asking the state to extend the same legal rights and responsibilities to same gender couples.
Your church defines marriage as between a man and a woman? Great! I won't go to your church for a blessing. You get to keep defining marriage your way, but can't impose your bias on me.
People like you argued against redefining marriage to allow interracial marriage. You are on the losing side of history...and morality.
The state has no business picking favorites when it comes to relationships.
And then, SGN can have a big story to chase! And heartbreak! And sorrow! And pictures of crying lesbian couples!
Morality indeed, Heterosexuals.
Morality indeed.
i feel so ashamed...
Which is it, LC, that you have a problem with: the right of the people to make laws or the obligation of the government to follow those laws? If they threw out the standard 14%, you'd be upset because it wouldn't pass. And now you're upset because they're following the rules and checking each signature? If you can't vote, you can't sign a petition. You want us to believe that you're a stickler for the rules, and yet you'd have the rules thrown out when they suit you? I'm afraid life doesn't really work that way - even if that's how you live your faith.
PS – REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY.
1) Non-voters? Well that's pretty easy to comprehend.
2) Duplicates? That’s even easier.
3) No valid signature on file? Well that will likely be cleared up by the county and many will later be found valid but still that represents only .3%
4) Maybe you have a problem when signatures don’t match which represent just under 1% so here is the procedure:
In the case of a petition some times people will sign for their spouse and family members but that is illegal and one woman was actually prosecuted for voting by mail for her son.
Dear, please pull the Buddy Jesus Vibrator out of your cooch before you post here. It's making it harder for the rest of us to understand your post.
I asked a question as have others about the topic of signature match and what a signer might do if they feel they have been unfairly excluded.
No hysteria, I think there is a need for clear information about every possible ramification of this process, to the nits eyebrow as they say.
I asked via the Secretary of State blog so the answer would be public.
If the other side is short by a few hundred, rest assured, they will be using any resource to challenge the process. Clear early answers seem to me to be to our long term advantage.
By the way, Domenic Holden, Stranger writer, addressed part of the question. He mentions above that as part of the final process, counties will be double checking local records about signature match issues. So the topic is on many good minds.
George Bakan