No confidence is a perfectly valid option Mr. McKenna. All of your candidates are batshitcrazy and it is perfectly understandable that you do not want to vote for any of them. However, you need to come out and say that.

This is the huge problem the GOP is facing with the presidential primary circus. All of the candidates have toxic baggage that no down-ticket candidate wants to share. McKenna is trying to not pick the loser, but losers are the only choices.

Is caucusing really a civic (rather than party) duty?

Not sure if the repub caucuses operate differently than the dmes, but undecided is an option for dems. In 1992 several precincts in the 43rd went for undecided and allowed the delegates to make up their minds later.

Well, to be fair, a caucus is decidedly not anonymous. If he doesn't want to endorse a candidate, for whatever reason, I don't see how he can possibly participate in a caucus.

I guess he won't be running for Governor as the "Decider."

I think it odd that Mr. McKenna would go to caucus meetings to encourage people to participate in the process, and then not participate in the process himself. It seems very do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do and inauthentic.

@4:

I believe it's called uncommitted rather than "undecided". But you're certainly correct that it's a viable, and oft-used, choice at Democratic caucuses. I have no clue whether that's permissible for Republicans.

I signed in as uncommitted for my precinct's caucus in 2008, and even made the micro-speech in support of the position. Apparently, I was convincing enough that we would have had an uncommitted delegate based on the first count. Maybe the fact that I'm the PCO contributed to the initial support. The Obama people then grabbed away enough of the uncommitteds that the delegate disappeared ... so I too switched to Obama. We ended up as an 8-2 Obama precinct.

Final note -- the WSRP calls its caucuses a "straw vote". By which (I think) they mean that there's just one round of voting. It's also possible that such a vote could be carried out as a secret ballot ... write your fave on a piece of paper and toss it in a box. If so, McKenna's weasely ploy looks even slimier.

I am a Republican PCO and have run local caucuses for my precinct before. This year, I believe the lower levels will have less binding influence than ever before (in fact we had to be given reasons to be there...since they are time consuming).

As a PCO I would represent my precinct, ask citizens to attend, take in the votes and run the discussion. I am guaranteed a place at the next level which takes place at Green River college where generally I have been somewhat of a pain as I tend to argue for things like investing in hydrogen fuel cells...the passion for which does not seem to permeate the body politic therein.

@8: Uncommitted.

Duh. Yep, that was the word I was looking for. Thanks.