Mike Daisey will soon start telling a story about how Cornish thugs broke into his house and beat him up and forcibly took the fake degree out of his hands. There will be lots of really dramatic, stage-ready lines like when one of the thugs turn towards him in the doorway just before leaving and says "You know what they say: All great art is theft."
It will, of course, be bullshit, and when quizzed about it, Mr. Daisey will say, "... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I think it was important to convey the *idea* of what they did."
@ 1, given the rationalized defense Daisey got from some corners, I wouldn't be surprised if there was some heated disagreement among the Cornish leadership. A surprising number of people really don't understand that noble ends don't justify every available means.
Geocrackr very charitably establishes a core difference between Right and Left these days. The Right will keep doing things the wrong way until they become ingrained and "correct," not caring about the means or the truth, and the left will actually revise their views and morally police their "own."
One accepts what is true, the other tries to create their own truth.
Also, this happened in academia, not one the floor of congress. It is really a case of scholars and peer review working to eventually find truth.
Daisey's statement makes it sound like he was asked to withdraw from the ceremony because HE'S TOO FAMOUS AND AWESOME and his presence would be too much of a distraction.
All I can say is wow-- I expect nothing less from a serial distorter.
Because the emails (if real) show that Mike was trying to do damage control again by withdrawing. Cornish wanted the impact of taking it away from him. Not as nice on their part, I suppose.
Enjoy!
It will, of course, be bullshit, and when quizzed about it, Mr. Daisey will say, "... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... I think it was important to convey the *idea* of what they did."
People of my ilk also frown upon cannibalism.
One accepts what is true, the other tries to create their own truth.
Also, this happened in academia, not one the floor of congress. It is really a case of scholars and peer review working to eventually find truth.
All I can say is wow-- I expect nothing less from a serial distorter.
Whereas your frauds fail upwards. God you're stupid.
Because the emails (if real) show that Mike was trying to do damage control again by withdrawing. Cornish wanted the impact of taking it away from him. Not as nice on their part, I suppose.