The DisneyDVD fast play option takes ten seconds to load and then ten seconds to sit through the explanation we’ve heard eighty times and then another 15 seconds to get to the menu screen. Pointless.
@2 someone needs to send that to the movie companies.
Why do people care? Do they not have Netflix or something?
DVDs are dead. If you don't offer me a cheap, convenient way to stream your movie I'm either going to pirate it or not watch it. They need to keep up if they want to stay relevant. At this point, I don't even care if they're able to do so or not.
It's really hard to figure out why people would pirate something when the legal copy of it is deliberately made worse and harder to use. The studios (I almost typed "stupidos") need to think about ADDING value to their legal product, not REMOVING it.
When making copies of DVDs I am always unsure of whether or not I should include the FBI warning and other anti-piracy propaganda. Sometimes I leave it in, sometimes I leave it out.
Is this for NTSC DVDs only, or will people renting PAL discs be subject to the same FBI/HSI anti-piracy screenings? Twenty seconds should be enough for people to stretch their legs and go get/open refreshments from the kitchen or plastic store bags, right?
Simple solution: all you do is rip those DVDs & then burn copies and you can get rid of any PUOs (Prohibited User Operations) like not being able to skip the copy warnings!
Fuck this, and while we're at it, fuck movies for purchase that run trailers before the feature. You buy a DVD, you pop it in, and the first screen should be the menu.
As someone who works in post production and actually has made commercial DVDs and BluRays for retail release, this is not going to happen, and is simply unenforceable if they tried. More and more studios don't even bother with the FBI warning or put them all the way past the final credits.
Interesting. None of the movies I've downloaded have those warnings.
Hard to believe that when presented with "competition" providing a better product (their own product improved) for free, they would make their own original product that they're trying to sell me for $20 even worse. Doesn't seem like good business sense to me.
The studios need to look at piracy as a competitor, not a criminal. If you make a good product and let a customer buy use it with minimum hassle, people will buy it.
It wasn't RIAA lawsuits that killed Napster, it was the iTunes music store.
I haven't supported that industry for over a year, and even then it was a single movie ticket at a local theater. I really don't see me ever buying a product in the future that assumes I'm a criminal and wastes my time because of it. I don't need to be told how not to break the law when I'm not breaking the law, you need to tell the people breaking the law that they are breaking the law. Copyright has no right existing 70+ years after the death of the artist, if the terms were more reasonable more people would want to respect it.
ICE is enforced by Homeland Security...ya know...because if anyone pirates Load, the terrorists win (but, Lars loses, so I'm cool with it).
@2 someone needs to send that to the movie companies.
DVDs are dead. If you don't offer me a cheap, convenient way to stream your movie I'm either going to pirate it or not watch it. They need to keep up if they want to stay relevant. At this point, I don't even care if they're able to do so or not.
Fricking nanny state House Gestapo!
Hard to believe that when presented with "competition" providing a better product (their own product improved) for free, they would make their own original product that they're trying to sell me for $20 even worse. Doesn't seem like good business sense to me.
It wasn't RIAA lawsuits that killed Napster, it was the iTunes music store.
Score one for the pirates!