Jesus, that poor equestrian corpse.

IOKIYAR

@1, hey, the only thing worse than beating a dead horse is betting on one. Speaking of which, it's been too long since the last Darcy Burner post.

This just seems desperate from Ferguson. I was undecided on this race, but am now leaning toward Dunn. Without the choice and gay marriage issues on the table, I'd bet a lot of people are wrestling with this one. I was also impressed that Bill Finkbeiner was at Pride this weekend: He's definitely got my vote.

Didnt Mayor McGinn hire Chris Bushnell, who had to resign from his position, for lying on his resume (he did not have a doctoral degree). Apparently, McGinn reluctantly accepted his resignation. He didnt care that he was previously convicted of bank fraud in 1994.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/lo…

Hey everyone just so you know Goldy broke this story. Or at least he was the first to give this, the story of our times, the dramatic weight it needs. It's about time we all gave him the recognition he deserves. It's important that we associate Goldy with this whenever possible. When you think padded resume; think Goldy.

I await the next update of ResumeGate with baited breath. As should we all.

PoliGeek, wow where to start. You are choosing to vote for someone who can be summed up rather completely by, "a bad actor who happened to be born out of a famous GOP congresswoman and was lucky enough to just be placed onto an elected council" over someone based on debatably incorrect statement?

The times had an issue with what Ferguson said because Dunn never had to report to a probation officer. Basically the only thing one could take issue with is whether or not it was a 'serious' crime. Frankly, the article should of been titled

"Ferguson slightly exaggerates a punitive crime by using a more powerful adjective then the injustice itself commanded."

This whereas Reagan Dunn's only real positive qualities were totally buffed up, if not outright changed from reality to suit his answers.

I just mean... I think it is silly to advertise you are going to vote for a candidate for an incredibly asinine reason.

On top of that, the only thing going for Dunn is that he can ride the coat tails of Rob McKenna except for one major thing. Ferguson's civil experience is much more comparable to McKennas and Gregoire, the last two Attorneys General.

As soon as I saw the times article I thought the same thing as Goldy.

Anyone who has up until quite recently been "undecided" on any race -- especially Ferguson/Dunn -- is both too stupid and ignorant to vote. Please just ignore the election. Thank you.

Saw the Times truth needle and read the whole thing. Afterwards I said "the fuck?"
A smear job on Ferguson where they buried the fact that he knew he was wrong after th jump, when Dunn is full of it?
Your bias is the elephant in the room Seattle Times!

Also made me think of the head editorialist saying they were just asking questions about the arena deal... "have you stopped beating your wife?" is just a question! Why so serious?

Poligeek, me thinks you are either an idiot or a troll. Anyone who would actually lean toward Dunn over Ferguson has his head up his ass. Thank the fucking GOD the rest of the voters disagree with you.

Poligeek, me thinks you are either an idiot or a troll. Anyone who is leading towards Dunn over Ferguson has his head stuck up his ass. Thank God the rest of the state disagrees with you. Just come out of the closet, man. You are a Republican.