Comments

1
As much as I thought the Theater Week ads were unforgivable: http://www.paulmullin.org/just-wrought/2…

I have to go with TPS for this. Let's invest fully in actually producing Seattle theatre. Theatre Arts education is a much more questionable good.
2
Which one can actually pay their bills?

Seattle Center borrowed $3 million dollars from the city general fund largely because the non-profits have not paid their bills.

They are looking at losing money again next year.

The $1.5 million dollars Nick Licata took from the Sonics settlement to fund infrastructure in the "Theater District" has returned unpaid bills.
Enough, go with the one with the money, please, thanks.
3
There is another big difference, regarding money, in fact: Cornish is proposing scaling up to a flat-fee rental rate of $5,000 per month (which seems like a screaming deal, doesn't it? Anyone just wanna live there and call it performance art?) while TPS is proposing a revenue-sharing agreement. This is what they do with the Center spaces they manage now, and they claim to have exceeded the revenue goals the Center had for them.
4
TPS would be the better solution for the theatre ecology. And I'm a Cornish Alum.
5
Ah yes, Theater Puget Sound, who just announced: "Help keep our studios clean - adopt a TPS rehearsal room!" Who will adopt an entire theater for them?

Please wait...

and remember to be decent to everyone
all of the time.

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.