These people only have as much a right to privacy as the people whose photos they're distributing. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, assholes.
So far I haven't heard any argument defending what these people do that doesn't also defend their own exposure.
I wonder why it's "free speech" to secretly take pictures of unsuspecting minors in public and then post them without their consent, but it's NOT free speech to expose people who do this using information that they've voluntarily posted online?
I wonder what would bias someone in favor of the jailbait pics, since any truly objective, noble ideals regarding "free speech" wouldn't allow exceptions for one form of exposure and not the other...
So far I haven't heard any argument defending what these people do that doesn't also defend their own exposure.
I wonder why it's "free speech" to secretly take pictures of unsuspecting minors in public and then post them without their consent, but it's NOT free speech to expose people who do this using information that they've voluntarily posted online?
I wonder what would bias someone in favor of the jailbait pics, since any truly objective, noble ideals regarding "free speech" wouldn't allow exceptions for one form of exposure and not the other...