Introducing the Inverse Benghazi

Back to article

Comments

Clearly the NOAA is more reliable than the CIA.

Sir Vic on October 30, 2012 at 2:24 PM

or Cindy McCain's since deleted tweet ...

http://updates.gawker.com/post/346383761…

Gordon Werner on October 30, 2012 at 2:35 PM

The GOP has become a zoo of the bizarre.

Well said.

Knat on October 30, 2012 at 2:41 PM

Let's see. Why WOULD the President want to take so seriously a massive unstoppable storm directly threatening the lives and well being of nearly 100 Million of his fellow citizens along with the economic engine of 40% of the country?

As upposed to, say, a terrorist attack with no advanced warning outside US borders that only potentially threatens maybe a dozen US citizens. Hmmmmmm?

THAT IS A PUZZLER THAT HAS NO ANSWER!

tkc on October 30, 2012 at 2:42 PM

The right wing really misses Gadhafi.

Pope Peabrain on October 30, 2012 at 3:32 PM

Heckuva job Romney.

Rujax! on October 30, 2012 at 4:49 PM

If only the National Weather Service had given us several days' warning about Benghazi! Where were they?!

Pope Buck I on October 30, 2012 at 9:10 PM

There is no "there" there. He's looking for any excuse to bash Obama. I suppose if you have no leg to stand on, then you grab at anything you can.

mikeinSF on October 31, 2012 at 12:42 AM

"Heck of a Job Brownie" has a lot of balls to be making any comments about anything given his handling of Hurricane Katrina..

The one thing I can say about Repubs -- they have absolutely no shame.

Patricia Kayden on October 31, 2012 at 6:49 AM