Too bad they felt the need for that second point, but at least it is progress.

How soon until we can do away with puritan clothing rules entirely?

/sexist clothing rules? When a rule is specific to gender, it deserves scrutiny.

With the demise of circuses, freaks had to go somewhere.

Nightmare@4: Yeah, because burn victims, people who've had cancer, amputees, etc, they're all "circus freaks", especially if they want to get their freak on, by, you know, going for a swim. I can't imagine a worse nightmare than having in to live 24-7 in your twisted head. Condolences, freak.

Genitals--- non gender specific
Buttocks (thong)----- non gender specific
Breasts----gender specific

?.... Is this age related?
Is pubic hair "genitalia"...
Do "man boobs" count if they are big enough?
Are there minimum square inch size definitions???
Is "Plumbers Butt Crack' display (serious swim trunk sag) the same level of offense as labial display or emphasis(camel toe or low cut bikini)?
What about a "Chili Pepper Sock'??

Enquiring minds want to see pictures...;-D GBSEGWW

So are the state equal rights amendment and city equal rights law just jokes? I cannot believe how government and businesses can keep getting away with sexist rules with no consequence. Can you imagine if this was done with any other protected class?

I'm not sure why women can't be topfree anywhere a man is. Breasts are not sex organs; they are for feeding children.

Damn our society is stupid at times!

www.tera.ca

http://notsoshameful.tumblr.com/

http://gotopless.org/index.php