Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
I was thinking the levels rise when the new father has to drive that babysitter home.
Might the reduced ass-chasing also make for a more harmonious, newly-procreating couple? She's wiped out from pregnancy, birth, and nursing and he's not playing with the chick in the next cave quite as much.
Yeah, it seems (from reading the papers) that a lot of guys go "on a run" after having the kid.
Sex is competitive...it basically comes down to everyone wants whatever everyone else has...keeping up with the Joneses.
So if one gets a baby, the others all need to have one too. And if the male shows that he is capable of generating one, then they all have to have it as well.
My friend Scott, who was shag machine in college, called this the "dog in a manger" effect.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/dog-i…
And as for it being from 2011, uh, I'm an historian, so that still counts as new. #lameexcuse
They must have made a mistake.
Because here on Slog we know that Single Motherhood is fine, in fact JUST AS GOOD,
and we know here on Slog that Lesbians make the best parents, that two cute chicks (OK. even two beefy butch broads...) are better parents than any woman saddled with a man can be.
We also know, here on Slog; that two guys are JUST AS GOOD as a man married to the mother of his children.
So, we call BullShit.
?! And your study contains how many participants?
Perhaps sexism and ageism is not ok, even if you are not the targeted gender or age group?
Hmm?
Obviously.
20-ish waifs aren't the only ones with an ass. Nor are they categorically the be-all-end-all for the attraction scale.
Psst, your ageism is showing.
I am sure the rooster would claim causation between his crowing and the sun coming up, but wishful thinking doesn't make it so.
Some folks really want to believe that middle-aged dudes are getting it on all the time. It's almost like they have a personal investment in said belief.
This reminds me that when I was 35, I hooked up with a 53 years-old male, who gave me my first orgasm just by licking my feet. Miaow !
Setting that aside, your unspoken assumption is that the frequency and quality of sex that straight men have is entirely dependent on:
a) how much sex they want
b) how many times they are able to ejaculate in a given period of time
c) how attractive 20-year-old women find them
Anyone see any flaws in that?
Funny that even as I was attracted to and fucking a 50-something woman, I couldn't imagine that I might be attractive when I got that old.
"Older people are just not as attractive, I'm sorry. That's not ageism, that's a fact."
What if I said:
"Darker people are just not as attractive, I'm sorry. That's not racism, that's a fact."
See how stupid you are? I know you think (along with Keekee) that you are the center of the universe, and what you find attractive IS objectively attractive, but since you are just one (moronic) person, perhaps that is just your opinion?
Or maybe the worth of people is not just what you decide it is based on their appearance? Maybe?
Alas, 40 is over a decade gone, but the desire and its fulfillment sure aren't. Another myth of youth, my dear. I hear tell folks in their 70's and even 80's STILL want the poontang. Beats all, don't it?