Starring Teal'c (the big alien guy from the stargate TV show), that super hot CRAZY chinese lady that aways gets nekkid (!) and a bunch of central american little people. WHY ARE YOU STOPPING ME FROM SEEING THIS, PETER JACKSON?
The problem is that these companies make these movies (if you can even call them that) with the sole purpose of confusing people into buying their product. The trailer is one thing, but ever see one of these on the shelf? It looks as close to the real thing as possible without being identical. Grandma's and people with limited english skills are the most common victims.
The Tolkien estate has been really rabid for years on protecting its IP. They've been preventing anyone else from using the word "hobbit" for decades (hence D&D using the word "halfling" after its initial publication). So I'm going to guess the movie guys weren't necessarily the driving force behind this. If they were so interested in shutting this sort of thing down why is the one time they followed through.
Also judging by the ethnicity of those midgets, and the general stone age setting it looks like Age of The Hobbits might have been based on these guys:
Network Awesome did a whole weekend devoted to knockoffs. Here's the second day's installment (and you can find the first in the archives) http://networkawesome.com/2012-11-18/bat…
These guys, and even (God help me) the Sci-Fi* Channel fill a void left by the end of double-features that needed a B- or Z-picture, and of the drive-in. Where else are eventually-good actors and directors (and sets, makeup, warddrobe, p.a.'s, editors,...) going to (quite possibly) stink, shielded by obscurity and very low profit expectations?
No one should have to be the bottom feeders. The government should force talented directors to contribute a certain amount of time each year to helping shitty studios touch up their films.
On The Media did a segment (sure it's podcastable somewhere) on knockoff books sold via Amazon that's the literary equivalent of this. They say the books are often more like pamphlets printed in gigantic fonts. And sell pretty well (relatively speaking, of course) unfortunately.
Though I'm guessing you'll assert that anyone purchasing "35 Shades of Grey" gets what they deserve, regardless of whether or not it's what they were seeking.
Are they the ones who made "Battle of Los Angeles" that came out around the time of the big-budget "Battle: Los Angeles"? I admit to falling for that one. It was totally unwatchable, but I'm sure they get some good cash from those they fool (like me). Hard to imagine how they sleep at night, working within this business model. Ick.
(Incidentally, when I eventually saw "Battle: Los Angeles", I felt equally icky)
Well I managed to see the video by bypassing the private settings by using MacTubes. It looks like it has nothing to do with the Hobbit story line at all.
Also judging by the ethnicity of those midgets, and the general stone age setting it looks like Age of The Hobbits might have been based on these guys:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floren…
*Okay, it's now called 'Syfylis'.
You mean idiot customers who can't tell the difference.
http://www.onthemedia.org/2012/nov/23/pr…
On The Media did a segment (sure it's podcastable somewhere) on knockoff books sold via Amazon that's the literary equivalent of this. They say the books are often more like pamphlets printed in gigantic fonts. And sell pretty well (relatively speaking, of course) unfortunately.
"Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" WASN'T a mockbuster of "Lincoln" ?!?
(Incidentally, when I eventually saw "Battle: Los Angeles", I felt equally icky)