Comments

1
I don't like 69.50.445 at all. "In view of the general public," does that mean I can't stand by a window with my marijuanas?
2
I have issues with rcw 69.50.505 concerning property seizure. It does not clearly identify licensed producers complying with state law shall be subject to seizure for any reason.

I also have a problem with rcw. 69.50.203 subjugating state aw to federal law and international treaty. Not excluding weed from this provides the Feds to use the excuse of, oh well we signed a treaty in 1961..
3
@1 - Pretty much, yes.
4
Penalty seems to be $50, if I'm reading it correctly. Meh ~ I doubt this will be enforced with any kind of zeal.
5
Also, it appears that this is the *new* sections, and that the amended sections have yet to be updated by the state.
6
Never mind me, I now see that there are two definitions section -- one for the old, and one for the definitions as amended. I much prefer the latter.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.