Comments

1
I never thought I'd miss Elisabeth Hasslebeck so much. She was an offensive right-wing troll, but at least she doesn't have a pile of dead babies to her name.
2
The way to get ABC's attention is to go after their advertisers (just like what happened to Rush Limbaugh). Anybody who is showing ads on the entire network needs to be put on notice.
4
Didn't she recant and change her views? I thought she was just an advocate of helping autistic children now.
5
The problems is she's in such a celeb bubble that there is no correcting her. Every peice of factual information gets scrubbed and twisted to satisfy her beliefs. She's like a Christian only about something scientifically verifiable.

I'm hoping that she'll keep her mouth shut about it since she knows she is biased in that regard. Or at the very least, The View could have, oh I don't know, a super-smart female scientist on the panel to call bullshit on these has-been comedians and journalists.
6
@2: are you aware of which companies advertise on The View? I'll contact all of them today with my intention to boycott.
7
The View is still on TV? ABC has something relevant on the airwaves still?
8
You know, it doesn't really count as a "boycott" if you never watch the show anyway.
9
If I ever watched anything on ABC, I would stop.

@6 Good plan. Post the list.
10
I hate the view. Bunch of ladies talking over each other. It's almost 1% as bad as falsely scaring parents away from vaccinating their children.
11
@9: If I can come up with one, I'll get it posted here. Not seeing anything updated since 2008 at the moment, though. I've never seen the show, so I've no starting point here right now.
13
I trust Barbara Walter's judgment on this. It will all work out fine.
14
The studio where it takes place is three blocks from my building. If there's picketing, I'm in.
15
Ugh! They can have no-talent Jenny. We've got Buffy leading our fight.

http://www.parade.com/21514/linzlowe/sar…
16
Reactionary believers on both sides of the vaccine debate will not yield good, scientific knowledge. What science can tell us is that what we know about vaccines doesn't yield scientific evidence at this time to support the conclusion that vaccines are the cause of autism or other illnesses.

Science does not have the ability to explain the correlation seen in limited statistical data that some believe shows a link.

Science is not a belief. Good science is an evolutionary, progressive process based on cumulative knowledge and rigorous research. We simply don't know what we don't know until we do know something that reveals our previous state of ignorance.

What science does know is that eating animal protein & fat increases the level of the MFO enzyme in our liver, which results in the release rogue DNA from the cellular structures of bad bacteria, viruses and fungi. This DNA may be able to pair with our own cells, or it may cause an autoimmune response. The link between increased MFO from eating animal protein & fat and developing certain cancers has been proven; other links are being researched.

What science also knows is that eating processed sugars together with animal protein & fats increases the incidence of insulin intolerance and autoimmune responses in your body (Type 2 Diabetes), your developing fetus (Type 1 Diabetes), and in your and your child's brain (possibly linked to several brain-related disorders, but definitive link is still being researched).

Though science may be sadly behind in its research of the cause and effects between a mother's health and nutrition and the development of negative health effects in the fetus, common sense tells us we should look closer at these factors for possible links.

What we do know is that anti-vaccine believers are definitely increasing the risk of their child becoming both the victim and vector of diseases that vaccines would have prevented.

Belief may suffice as a pacifier for our inability to accept what we cannot know, but belief should never suffice as a saccharin substitute for the knowledge that is available to those willing to seek it.
17
But there's TWO people leaving The View -- both Elisabeth and Joy. I heard on Twitter that the second replacement will be polio.

18
Speaking of vaccines, the Japanese government has officially stopped recommending the HPV vaccine and has begun warning its citizens against taking the shot citing adverse health effects including death.

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/japa…
19
@17 SNORK!
20
@16

Sources!

How exactly does extracellular DNA from "bad" viruses, bacteria, and fungi "pair up" with our cells? Extracellular DNA gets destroyed. It doesn't somehow magically enter our cells and integrate into its chromosomes. Only certain (and only certain) bacteria can do that. Eukaryotic cells - including animal cells - don't have that ability. The only way you can insert a piece of DNA into a chromosome in a eukaryotic cell is to have an appropriate virus deliver it. You can't just mix eukaryotic cells and free DNA together and expect to end up with some of those free DNA strands mutating - inserting themselves into - a eukaryotic chromosome. Life is crazy and some amazing things have been discovered, so there might be an exception, but I haven't heard of any insertion of free genetic material into a eukaryotic cell's chromosome. You call it "rogue DNA" and I don't know exactly what you mean by that.

And "bad" viruses? Are there any "good" viruses? They're all obligate parasites. I guess if I hate and detest English ivy and, suddenly, some virus that's pathogenic to them comes out of nowhere and starts to clear the ivy out, the virus might then be a "good" virus. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." (Arabian proverb, I think.)

We agree on vaccines, though, which is the point of the post.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.