Comments

1
He didn't "get away" with murder. In Florida, murdering people is legal.
2
Maybe Zimmerman was a Right Wing Fundamentalist Christian. :P

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petitio…
3
She explicitly says she had to put away her feelings, look at the evidence.

So, the evidence was that he was not guilty. Good thing our justice system isn't based on ~feelings.

GET THE FUCK OUT.
4
Here we go again...Thanks Paul.
5
Get away from god? LOL. Yep, he's checking he ledger, seeing who's naughty and nice.
6
@5, I have a feeling you won't be needing a sweater.
7
cold comfort. manslaughter was an option, and if the rest of the ladies wouldn't go there, a hung jury mistrial. she voted to acquit.
8
We can't blame the jurors for the fucked-up jury instructions, but that doesn't mean we should pretend the instructions weren't unacceptably contorted and remiss in excluding the initial-aggressor exception, based on inaccurately-cited precedent.

The notion that the jury was obligated to find Zimmerman not culpable under the law is a wholesale fabrication of gun nuts, right-wingers, and racists. We need to stop giving it credence.
9
@4: I know this whole liberal racial outrage thing makes you uncomfortable and defensive and whatnot but Constant is not actually responsible for the news. You know that right?
10
@8: WORD.
11
She'll change her tune when GZ pulls her out of a burning wreck.

Or maybe next Tuesday ... whichever comes next.
12
What @1 said.
14
@1: Missing a word. Starts with 'B'.
15
@11

Shhhh

The Stranger is trying really hard to ignore any news stories that don't fit their narrative. In their minds Zimmerman, the jury, the judge and prosecution and the legislature that wrote SYG laws all belong to the same KKK chapter and all own AK47s.

Don't confuse the children!
16
Florida law says you cannot challenge a person with lethal force if they have a right to be there.

Martin was on his own private property...as much as if he were in the shared living room where both Zimmerman and Martin were sharing an apartment.

The minute Zimmerman left his car to pursue Martin with a gun, a crime was set in motion.

This jury was poorly instructed -- or just plain stupid -- and the prosecution did its best to make Martin look like the perpetrator!

This has to be declared a mistrial.

17
@14,
I know, but the federal government won't let them explicitly say it's only legal to murder blacks. They have to leave that to Florida's education system, criminal justice system, news media, and assorted local racists to ensure any uniformed resident is aware the law is for killing blacks. And it's apparently working.
18
God need the Z Man to be free so that family could be pulled from a burning car.

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/…




19
I sincerely hope you folks get tried by press and feelings and inuendo sometime. Maybe then you'll appreciate how good our system of trial by evidence and rule of law is.
20
@ 19, I know you do. I'm sure waiting for your lesbian tenant's lease to run out was a more lawful way for you to inflict your petty tantrum than evicting them would have been.
21
@19 I sincerely hope you get murdered in a dark alley.
22
@19: the only substantial evidence in the case showed that zimmerman's bullet was in martin's chest.

this is an instance where the law and the words "reasonable doubt" allowed a vigilante/1st degree manslaughterer to walk away.
23
@19: I wonder what that system of trial by evidence and rule of law would have to say about your purposeful denial of a lease renewal to your lesbian tenants in angry response to marriage equality coming to the state of Washington.
24
The point is that he is free ,Hollywood movie next, and a fat check account.My condolences to Martin Family.
25
wow this chick is ignorant
26
9: The Martin family, and the Zimmerman family, extended relatives, their attorneys, people that have the same last name as Zimmerman, would all like to stop receiving death threats, so yes they would all like this whole "racial outrage thing" of this story to die down. Who wouldn't?
27
The prosecution did a very crappy job. They phoned it in because they really didn't care. The only reason they put on a trial at all was to appease the Dept of Justice. The most sickening thing was how elated Angela Corey was that she lost. She behaved like she was on the defenses team....which, it turns out, she was.

http://jezebel.com/zimmerman-prosecutor-…
28
@26 - You know else who wants this story to go away? Those who are culpable for creating the situation which led to it. Those who want to be able to keep murdering black kids. Those who are looking for the right opportunity to "help out" their neighborhood watch and are afraid they'll lose their chance to kill one themselves if people realize how truly fucked up this situation is and want to do something about it.

Yes, those people would love for this to all go away. You know who doesn't? People who want the opposite of what those people want. Go cry your crocodile tears elsewhere sycophant.

29
@28
Perhaps you should take a look at who is REALLY murdering black kids

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cri…]

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/cri…

Protip:
It is not the Neighborhood Watch or white-hispanics.

Now kindly go spout your racism somewhere else.
30
@28: Thanks, Pridge, I have nothing to add.
@29: It's always racism, reverse or otherwise, when someone liberal says something about race that makes conservatives feel bad in their warm and gooey places. Rolling my gay black bed-wetting liberal eyes at your butthurt.
31
And sometimes it's the people like CB here who believe that guns give them special rights. They would love to change the subject to something else before someone questions the sanctity of their guns or the sanity of stand your ground laws. And if they kill someone like Zimmerman did, they can even get their gun back afterward.

@29 - http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpc73v…

32
@31: This is what I'm saying.
33
@32 - Grazie!

You're not In Seattle right? I thought I remember reading that. If so thats too bad, the city would be lucky to have you (and I'd be offering to smoke you out sometime).
34
@27: There's an even better takedown at The Daily Kos:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/14…
35
@33: Unfortunately, no I'm not in Seattle. You're a sweetheart for saying it's too bad (and I would let you smoke me out only if you came to one of my famous [among my friends]Southern Heart Attack Dinner Parties, seeing as both these things go together quite well).
36
@35 - it's a deal. And that dinner party sounds amazing!
37
@28: Really man, all I'm talking about is the incredibly intense media scrutiny on a story that plays itself out (in various racial situations of all permutations) many times over across America on a daily basis, at least. And I have no doubt that you'd agree with that. All discourse on this case is corrupted by the political "industries" so-to-speak (from both sides) that have sprung up like mushrooms after a summer shower.
This case is moot. Civil or federal litigation is possibly next, but let's at least begin to talk in terms of that legal context. Because that's what matters.
I'm sorry, maybe it's just me, but I think that all these full-throttle laser beams of various agendas on this case will not be constructive in the long run.

38
@37: You seem sincere, so I'll temper this. If this is a story that "plays itself out...many times over across America on a daily basis, at least", wouldn't the obvious, non-cynical response be to continue to discuss it? There are deep rifts that were not just created but re-opened with this trial; it has obviously become much larger than its players and their fates. That won't fade or heal with silence and stoicism. I don't know if there's a clear outcome or endgame in sight for all this has riled up, but I do know pretending this was a simple and unsymbolic case with no resonance for the present and the future is, regardless of intention, wishful thinking of the rankest kind.
39
@37 - everything lolorhone @38 says goes for me, only he was much more gracious about it than I would be.
40
She should have toughed it out and hung the jury if that's how she felt. I agree with her that Zimmerman got away with murder. For now.
41
@29 - Because black-on-black crime not only cannot be considered evidence of institutional racism in and of itself, and certainly negates any outrage one might feel at an instance in which, whatever other facts were at play, an armed hispanic man killed an unarmed black teenager.
42
Trayvon Martin is dead because he attacked an armed man. He got what was coming to him. Let the word go out to every other thug: You never know who might be carrying.
43
@42 -
44
@42: "Damn, Dolores, pick another subject, pleeeease."- Prince, "Dinner with Dolores", 1996.
45
@43: Or see GIF @31- hey, that's yours too! And that's why we're friends.
46
@43, yeah, but I hear your thug hero is still dead. Funny thing about attacking an armed man. The Seattle bedwetters will piss and moan, but death has a certain permanence.
47
Fucking broken records. Can somebody turn that shit off?
48
@47, if you want to turn yourself off, you could stop posting. Of course, there's also the Rte. 99 bridge. I'd mention firearms, but I know you're against that, so you'll have to use a different method.
49
All I hear is things a terrified racist maniacal bigot would say over and over. I think it's a commie plot.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mapms6…

50
@49: Probably not. Commie plots are clever.
51
@26 Protesting is better than silence. If only because the World watches.

An unarmed teenager, minding his business, with no story of bad behaviour, was hunted down and murdered by a grown armed man, looking for trouble (that's what being a vigilante is). The man was from a higher social class.The man was not charged with anything, then was relunctantly charged, and found not guilty.

How can a country, where such things are allowed to happen, keep on claiming that its justice is blind to social class differences, and that it is "the leader of the free world" ? Most people (Americans are such a small part of the world population) could not care less that Florida is not representative of all the US. No protest equates "all of the US is happy about its having racist judicial procedures". And that's dangerous. Do you want the image of the US abroad to be "they are hypocritical callous killers, who even kill their own black people" ? Because I can assure you Bush junior's horrible wars and tortures have given a lot of credence to the "hypocritical callous killers" angle. That angle's end result : terrorism.

The US have never been a fine place to be black, and now it's a worse and worse place to be a woman too. At this point It's either protest until blatant injustices are resolved, and fascist politicians are removed from office, or abandon your country to fascism.

When I read about politics in the US, I'm scared for everybody I know and respect there. I feel like telling them to leave that wretched place, and come to Europe to find less danger in the streets, less injustice in the courts, and live a longer, happier life - and watch from afar the US follow on its path to fascism (what you call far-right is fascism) and then tank. But protesting is better.

The US brand of fascism, promoted by the rich, by the religious, and by the "white elderly males", has a real hold on your country. Your elections are not even free anymore (have they ever been ?) : non-whites have less access to vote, and voting is rigged by machine voting.

So regardless of the individuals involved, at this time citizens have either the choice to protest every injustice, or to flee abroad.
52
On another point : Am I the only one in finding it bewildering that several jury members, who did vote to acquit, now seem to dissociate themselves from the acquittal ? What did pressure all of them to acquit, then, if some were feeling sure it was indeed murder ? Sounds very, very fishy.
53
@52: From what I can gather, these jury members felt Zimmerman was guilty, but under Florida's bullshit self-defense laws (not to mention the Stand Your Ground laws that were thoroughly referenced in the jury instructions despite all the conservative talking points) could not convict him. Personally, how an armed vigilante who stalked an unarmed teenager in a car, then on foot, against police advisement, without identifying himself or answering the teenager's question "Why are you following me?"- how this man becomes a victim rather than the obvious aggressor to some people is beyond me. Actually, no it's not, it's racism.
54
@52, the jury didn't like Zimmerman, but they did something deeply unfamiliar to any whackjob, be they a right wingnut or a typical Seattle bedwetter: They applied the law. You see, in a functioning society, a criminal trial isn't a vote for Prom King.
55
@53, it's because there's no law forbidding a neighborhood watch volunteer, or anyone else, from following a suspicious character. But there is a law against assault, and in Florida (and Washington State) an armed victim of assault can use a firearm against his assailant if he had reasonable cause to believe he's in imminent danger of death or serious injury.

Your hero Trayvon Martin was a thug, but more importantly he was a criminal. And now he's a dead criminal thug. Which is a permanent state of affairs. If you don't like it, too fucking bad. Now go tell your thug friends that they'd better be goddamned careful next time, because if they attack an armed man they might be killed over it.

Trayvon Martin had it coming.
56
@54, 55:

Jesus, you are tiresome. A relaxed, satisfied mind and a range of vocabulary would lively up the angry, racist, stupid yet condescending, and- worst of all at this point- REPETITIVE bullshit you post. You're about a snifter of bourbon and a manic episode away from ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY... but then you'd just be crazy instead of an asshole with too much time on his hands and the mistaken belief that posting the same dumb shit over and over makes him a crusader for the truth instead of a nerve-shredding troll. And as much as I'd like to believe- for the sake of humanity- that this uncontrolled Tourette's-like barking of yours is a preexisting condition, I know in my heart this is just your own personal failing.
57
@56, I'm tiresome because I'm not afraid to tell you that you are full of shit, and to keep telling you that you're full of shit even as you throw the usual crap at me. You know: White guilt. Anyone who dares to say that some young black thug is a young black thug, and that young black thugs who attack armed men deserve whatever the fuck they get -- if the person who says it isn't black, then they are a tiresome racist, and if they're black, they are a self-hating uncle tom.

So fuck you. I judge not by the color of someone's skin, but by the content of their character. Your hero, the young thug Trayvon Martin, picked the wrong man to assault, and paid for it with his life. Harsh, yes. But Trayvon Martin had it coming. Now run along and worry about the thousands of black men who were murdered by other black men since your hero-thug decided to run a beat-down on the wrong victim.

Think you've made me feel guilty? Think again, idiot. Being black is no longer an automatic sympathy card in Seattle or anywhere else.
58
@57: ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOYALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY ALL WORK AND NO PLAY MAKES JACK A DULL BOY...

P.S.

And did you quote MLK? Motherfucker, PLEASE.
59
@58, oooh, black man says "motherfucker." I am soooooooo scared! Yep, I quoted MLK, who you obviously despise. He was one uncle tom motherfucker, wasn't he?
60
I get my own p.s.:

Now that we're having one of those honest chats about race in America, could you explain why black men commit 50% of the murders when they comprise 6.5% of the population?
61
@59, 60:

You are having an argument with the dim-witted voices inside your own head. We're not chatting about anything except your obliviousness to your own batshit bigotry. I don't want you to be scared; I don't care what you feel about me at all. I have already said more to you than I ever had any inclination to. Nothing productive will come of this, so why don't you find someone who will buy your "shock and awe" racist bullshit as some kind of unalloyed truth-telling? I suggest taking an informal poll as to who watches Fox News and go from there. At least then no one would have to be witness to you trying to act "hard" and "down", what with your insane and insanely awkward "put/run a beat-down" and "uncle tom motherfucker" turns of phrase. Nothing sadder than a racist secretly harboring an attraction to those he derides. Hey, you're not related to Strom Thurmond, are you?

In all seriousness, go away little man.
62
@60 - Why are the majority of serial killers in the US white men?
63
@60 - Why are most pedophiles white men?
64
@60 - when a black person commits murder, 96% of the time it's against another black person, but when a white person commits murder, it's against a white person only 84% of the time. Why are why people so eager to kill other races at a much higher percentage than blacks?
65
@60 - black men are expelled, arrested, and incarcerated at levels far higher than white people for the same types of crime. Why is the law so unevenly applied in this nation, and how do you think this impacts black communities?
66
@60 - In Florida, Stand Your Ground was passed by the legislature and signed into law which shows clear aggressive action by the state for the use of this type of law. In Washington State, SYG is not an actual law but was established by court precedent. How do you think the origins of SYG for each state have impacted the application of the law in those states?
67
@60 - Given what I noted @65 about higher conviction and incarceration rates for blacks than weights for the same crimes due to the unequal application of the law, can you explain why you would believe that Florida's SYG law would be exempt from this?

And with that as a background, do you believe that the law could be used to kill black people (like Martin) by encouraging escalated usage of force (ie, murder) while simultaneously denying that same race of people the same leniency for murder if the situations were reversed?
68
@60 - Do you think you "had it coming" when you were made late for work because you got a ticket for jaywalking? If not, why not?

If you had been black and the cop white, and given your aggressive and confrontational nature, and noting that the chance for such an event increases greatly in such a scenario, would you have still "had it coming" if you had ended up shot dead instead?
69
@lolorhone: You are awesome with awesome sauce. 56 was beautiful.

@noicons: I'm going to give you the same advice I gave Seattleblues. You need to dial it back a little. If you present too much like a racist cartoon character, readers will write you off as just stupid, or loony, and you'll end up like poor Sgt. Doom; all sound and fury and read by nobody.

Remember! If you're too outrageous, you outrage no one. Or you get banned.
It is a delicate balance.
70
Pridge, you need some kaopectate.
71
Lissa, if you present too much as a dried up liberal bitch, the readers of the Stranger will love you!
72
If it's not a pre-approved talking point, Noicons' got nuttin'.
73
That's funny, Pridge/bitch. The reality is exactly the opposite. If I don't spout a talking point that's "pre approved" by the Stranger's orthodox bed-wetting liberals, then you tender souls just freak out. Your minds are just as closed as any in the wingnuttiest parts of Texas.
74
Lissa: The feeling is more than mutual.

Pridge: If it's a talking point Noicons introduced, he's got nuttin'. The silence after 62-68 proves the full extent of the nuttin', and I commend you.

Noicons: When arguing with a woman, if she makes a point and all you have to say in retort is "You're a bitch", you lost. Badly. Just sayin'.
75
@74, well, you're a bitch too. Happy now?
76
@75:

When arguing with a gay man, if he makes a point and all you have to say in retort is "You're a bitch, too", you lost. Badly. Just sayin'.
77
So you're a black gay man? Ooooh, I'd better say "your honor," at least around here. How about, "your honor, bitch?"
78
@77:

Damn, man, you just keep missing the point, even when the punchline is you. Which is not unusual, but are you really getting anything out of this at this point?
79
@78, yeah, I get that you're a black gay man who feels so trapped by his identity that he can't step away from it and take the facts and circumstances as they come. It's understandable, but it's also sad and pathetic. Yep, I get it. You feel like a stranger in a strange land. Must be tough.
80
Anatomy of Noicons' Debate Strategy:
1) Semi-innocuous but offensive talking point as told by Fox News (or equivalent)
2) As the narrative in the comment thread evolves, bring in additional "data" from RedState and The Blaze
3) As Noicons' talking points are demolished, bring in racist bleating from Breitbart and Stormfront.
4) When Noicons find itself isolated but determined to have the last word, start spitting out one liner personal insults.
5) MUST HAVE LAST WORD.

At some point I assume it ends up in a puddle of it's own tears and piss, sobbing because it realizes that a female dog is higher on the evolutionary ladder than it can ever hope to be.

81
@78 - Yeah man, you're completely "trapped" in your identity. Why can't you just think like a racist white guy? If Justice Clarence Thomas can do it, why not you? Then all your racial issues will just go away and you'll obviously be living in MLK Dreamland!

What a crock of bullshit.

Good to see you back, I like the new icon! So do we let it have the last word? I think we've covered near everything that'd need to be said if a random stranger wandered in here and surveyed the debate.
82
Poor Pridge, reduces himself to caricatures and outright lies. Typical Seattle liberal: Professes to be soooooo much better than "those people," but in the end he's the flip side of the wingnut coin. Pridge couldn't think for himself if his life depended on it.
83
What's especially fun is Pridge's betwetting about "one liner personal insults."

This is the pathetic little whiner who has called me:a "racist" over and over. I especially liked "terrified racist maniacal bigot" in Pridge's post #49, and his use of "it" in recent posts to signify that those he disagrees with are not human. Kumbaya, ya hypocritical yet oh-so-typical Seattle fuckwad liberal. And then you wonder why so many people despise your kind?
84
@82: First sentence: accuse adversary of relying on "caricatures and outright lies"
Second and third sentences: caricatures and outright lies.
Gibe moni plos.
85
Oh, and to answer your question in #68, when the racist black cop ignored my request to write his ticket as quickly as possible because I needed to be at work in 15 minutes, I said nothing at all. I stood next to my motorcycle and waited for him to finish. I wasn't a stupid, violent criminal thug like your hero Trayvon Martin, who is dead, and who deserved it.

When I got to work, I explained what happened to the foreman, who laughed it off. As for your question in #65, blacks commit a far greater percentage of the violent crimes than their proportion of the population. If they don't want to be disproportionately imprisoned, they should start by behaving.
86
@79:

If I felt "trapped by my identity", I probably wouldn't cop to it since remaining wholly anonymous would be the easiest thing to do in this forum. I'm quite comfortable with it, as well as my own mind; being black and gay does not compel me to take up certain political positions- I came to those on my own. So keep your pity and your condescension: I don't feel like a stranger in a strange land, I feel like a gay black man talking to an asshole. See, I can take facts and circumstances as they come!
87
#84, he accused me of bringing in data from Red State and the Blaze, which I presume are wingnut sites that he hates. Look up my posts, and see how many times I've done that. (Hint: zero.) He says I bring in "racist bleating from Breitbart and Stormfront," which I also presume are right wing sites. Check out how often I've done so. (Hint: zero.)

Pridge is a typical liberal Seattle type: Absolutely cannot take it when someone calls out his bullshit. He's a whining little bitch. Looks like one too, at least if that's his picture. I hope the dude he blows likes him, anyway. Hey lolorhone, does Pridge do ya like you like it? Hope so. There's someone for everyone, and you seem well matched. You can talk civil rights in between squirts.
88
p.s.: He also said something about talking points from Fox News. I can't remember the last time I watched them, much less repeated their "talking points," whatever they are. When it comes to canned bullshit, your side does that around here to a fare-thee-well.
89
@81:

Good to be back. The icon is the physical CD image from PJ Harvey's Let England Shake- Harvey happens to be my favorite musician. As for Noicons, I felt I should address his notion of my identity politics (he doesn't seem to get that gross assumption is one of the fundamentals of bigotry) but w/r/t the Martin debate, we both know he can't proceed without the same endlessly repeated bullshit (he was a thug! he had it coming! he was your hero! you and your thug friends better watch out! I'm foaming at the mouth! Get to thuh choppa!! AAAARGH!!!). He never had a point, so I say we say something if we feel like it but, in reality, we won the minute he starting typing.
90
@88: Suggesting that me and Pridge are fucking would only be insulting if we were insecure straight dudes. So I'm guessing that suggesting you and Seattleblues are destined to fuck like Billy Bob and Angelina on crystal meth would probably squick you out something fierce. But don't miss your chance at true happiness because you're so trapped in your identity you can't step away from it and take the facts and circumstances as they come.
91
@84: Exactly.
92
@90, I don't mean to insult either of you by suggesting that Pridge blows you. I'm all for him putting his enthusiastic mouth to work on the man of his dreams. Or are you telling us that you blow him?
93
@92: See the first line of @90, you repetitive bore.
94
Am I correct to think that would be a "No," then? But come on, don't you think Pridge is cute? I like his smile, don't you? I bet he's good. Why won't you give him a chance, you racist?
95
@94:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...........................................................
96
@95, is that the sound of Trayvon's body decomposing?
97
@96: I'm just going to cut and paste this from my post @56:

"And as much as I'd like to believe- for the sake of humanity- that this uncontrolled Tourette's-like barking of yours is a preexisting condition, I know in my heart this is just your own personal failing."

Yeah, pretty much that covers it.
98
@96 -

Don't forget, I've also said you hurt your dick masturbating to dead black teenagers.

You've done nothing tho suggest anything that I've said and/or implied about you is incorrect. I call you what you are.
99
@noicons,

Imagine living in a housing complex/development that you recently moved to. The incompetent neighborhood watch doesn't bother to update it's knowledge of the residents, and decides to harass you "because you don't belong". While dealing with the arrogant fuck that is getting in your face, you get upset and push back. Whether you end up on top or the bottom of the tussle, the hero wanna-be pulls a gun and shoots you. The end (you die).

How does this scenario make you a thug or a criminal?? Oh, wait...you've been smoking pot, so therefor you should die for your sins. I mean EVERYONE knows how physically aggressive being stoned on pot makes you...

Ah, you think, but that wouldn't happen to me since I'm not a hoodie wearing teenager. Or black.

My point exactly.

I'm not black, or a teen anymore, so I don't have those concerns anymore. Does it strike you odd that I don't want this scenario to happen to anyone else??? Once apon a time I was a large scary looking teen, frequently stoned, but it wasn't a lethal condition for me. It shouldn't be for anyone else either.

Peace
100
@98: Nice to have you back on the thread, Pridge.
101
@99: The problem with your argument w/r/t Noicons is that it is logical and empathetic. Both those qualities are wasted with him.

    Please wait...

    Comments are closed.

    Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


    Add a comment
    Preview

    By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.