Comments
Please wait...
Comments are closed.
Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.
Editors' Picks
is a proud member of the
media network
media network
All contents © Index Newspapers LLC
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
800 Maynard Ave S, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98134
However, he chalked it up, in part, to the fact that there was little else the State had been able to provide the people in the form of entertainment and so sex was the only real amusement readily had --at little or no cost-- by the populace at large. Other than alcoholism, that is.
(I remember him also claiming that doggy-style was the predominant position of choice in bothe the USSR & his homeland the Czech Republic. But I don't recall if he ever offered any socioeconomic explanations for that one.)
http://www.yhchang.com/CUNNILINGUS_IN_NO…
On the issue of sex, everyone changes position eventually.
@9: What the actual fuck did I just watch?
Clearly, nutrition can not be created ex nihilo, but oral does promote a sort of conservation.
Interesting, although I suspect you'd get a different answer if this film was about Soviet Russia.
1. State the conclusion ("bikes/urbanism/communism is awesome").
2. Find a random document somewhere on the internet that mentions the conclusion--it doesn't have to have anything to do with it at all, it just has to mention it (communist East German women had better sex, study finds less accidental deaths in urban areas, etc.).
3. Spend 5 minutes writing how the conclusion is right and this document justifies it in the loosest possible manner. Don't even consider discussing opposing points.
4. Repeat every day.
http://www.southalabama.edu/history/facu…
Whereas the west retreated from the chaos of WWII into conservative cultural institutions, the East German state, unhampered by religion, imposed a practical approach to sexuality on its population as part of its effort to engineer a society that would someday conquer the west. As a result, their sex education was (with some notable exceptions) amazingly progressive for its time, and ahead of where much of the US is today.
As for totalitarianism/communism, it does deserve some credit for this in that it:
a) Pushed religion completely out of the picture, something that liberal democracy can't do
b) Co-opted sex education from parents, who tend to approach this subject with anxiety, embarrassment, and ignorance
However, it seems to me that communism could have just as easily replaced religion with something equally sexually repressive. The fact that the East German state didn't says something about Germans, who have historically enjoyed relatively liberal societies since before they were conquered by the Romans (the Nazis being a short-lived anomaly).
Side note - perhaps your posts would be more interesting if you approached these subjects in a manner that didn't boil down to "see, this proves that I'm Right!"
i need to say more about this doc. it really is fascinating and my post does it no justice. i will come back to it tomorrow.
Women had better sex under Communism...who says that? Communists?
In this trash propaganda film itself, it says that the women in the 1960s sexually liberated West were not so happy as communist women, who had sexual liberation.
By simple logic, it contradicts the main premise: sexual liberation leads to happiness in women, which should be both for post-1960s women and communist women. This film doesn't explain this inconsistency.
The approach is completely all wrong and false. Sex is reduced to some sort of human animal function, with only a very fleeting tie to human emotions which is falsely called love.
The real purpose and function of sex is reproduction (hey, reproductive rights?), not a form of human pleasure toy that is totally disconnected to human reality.
Women and men who reduce themselves to sex without love, are destroying their dignity built in as human beings, and are being used as material things, which leads to sexual orgies which are psychologically self destructive, prostitution and a view of human relations which is completely cold and based on the worth of an orgasm.
There is no love in this film.
There is no connection between sex and the search of the human soul for God, Family, Work with the attendant peace, harmony, truth and prosperity.
Instead of Family and Children, this films applauds Divorce and irresponsible sex (not connected to commitment in marriage and children) which leads to Abortion.
Welcome to Sex Communism, East or Western version: Sex = pornography, contraception, divorce, abortion, inhuman relations between human beings.
What happens to the children from these sexual relations? Ohhh best that they were contracepted out of existence, if not, aborted, if not, then single motherhood or an orphanage or if they REALLY have to get married, get a divorce on the first marital fight?
Why no mention that by 1990, this so-called great communistic sexual society was rejected by easterners themselves and wanted to return to the West, where God and Family, a religion-based view of humans as souls of God and sexuality as producing children of God, is viewed.
Only disordered neo-troskitye, new left, and Sex communists would love this film.