@7 I have no actual idea if this is accurate in this case or not, but I assumed it would be not genetic because it's like a birth defect -- when some fetuses are developing in the womb, there's a mutation and it leads to a missing arm or an extra toe. It's not necessarily genetic, in that there's no "gene" for missing an arm. Like identical twins, it's just a random fluctuation (Okay, crazy thought -- what if this dude had a vanishing twin in the womb and he absorbed everything but his twin's penis...).
@10:
"... I did NOT absorb a twin. It's not genetic or inherited...."
@7:
If it was genetic, there'd be some mutation that causes it. Just as likely, something just went wrong during development for no particular reason, by pure chance.
The moral of the story is that doctors should NOT be allowed to perform cosmetic surgery on children's genitals for any reason. I can't believe it's not yet banned. If a parent wanted their baby to have a nosejob it would be a scandal, but cosmetic surgery on baby genitals is an everyday occurrence.
Thanks for this, Dan. I was wallowing in gloom because my genetic inheritance is screwing up my sex life, but when I read this it really cheered me up that some people are doing so well out of nature's lottery.
And I agree with Tom that you should do one.
"... I did NOT absorb a twin. It's not genetic or inherited...."
@7:
If it was genetic, there'd be some mutation that causes it. Just as likely, something just went wrong during development for no particular reason, by pure chance.
Still, good on his parents for not lopping off the extra wang when he was born, I guess.
Please ban ASAP.
If circumcision is so important for a religion, why prevent the faithful from voluntarily doing it in adulthood ?