And Pollan only really "debunks" the fact that most meat these days is too fatty to qualify as "paleo". Anyone who's serious about paleo eats grass-fed meat.
I've done paleo before, but it doesn't work for me over the long-term mainly for cost reasons. That diet, when done correctly, not in a I-can-eat-as-much-bacon-as-I-want way, forces you to prepare all your own meals, to eat a ton of fruit and vegetables, and to eschew any prepackaged "food". As a result, I find it kind of funny that Pollan has a problem with it.
@2 I think the point is we can't have the planet all eating grass fed meat and that whole grains and legumes - eschewed by Paleo dieters - are perfectly nutritious.
That and calling "Paleo" is misleading and disingenuous.
Given how much poor advice I've received over the years from certified nutritionists (including advising me to adopt a 1,200 calorie diet to lose weight), I prefer to make my own choices.
A) Who cares? If it (a particular "diet") works for you, great.
B) Vegetarians & Vegans push their "diets" with as much vigor as the Paleo crowd. CrossFit vs. Yoga. Again, Who cares.
C) Eat quality food in moderation. You'll be fine.
Very few of the meats and almost none of the plants available today qualify as paleo-anything, since they are all developed products of cross-breeding by post-paleo people. That's really the only thing wrong with it, though -- the name. It's just a fashion. But a more veg-intensive diet is better.
All diets are fads. Any area of human activity that resists measurable, verifiable solution is bound to experience one fad after another (e.g. management, education, health, diet, software development.) Anytime someone in one of these fields tells you they have the solution to all your problems, watch out for your wallet.
A: I hate it when people annoyingly spout pseudoscience.
B: Vegetarian diets are positive for the person (depending on how applied) and much less harmful (not a vegetarian.) It's not a fad.
C: Duh.
The link worked for me.
And Pollan only really "debunks" the fact that most meat these days is too fatty to qualify as "paleo". Anyone who's serious about paleo eats grass-fed meat.
I've done paleo before, but it doesn't work for me over the long-term mainly for cost reasons. That diet, when done correctly, not in a I-can-eat-as-much-bacon-as-I-want way, forces you to prepare all your own meals, to eat a ton of fruit and vegetables, and to eschew any prepackaged "food". As a result, I find it kind of funny that Pollan has a problem with it.
http://grist.org/food/michael-pollan-exp…
That and calling "Paleo" is misleading and disingenuous.
See also http://www.foodpolitics.com/2014/01/is-w…
Given how much poor advice I've received over the years from certified nutritionists (including advising me to adopt a 1,200 calorie diet to lose weight), I prefer to make my own choices.
MP had simple advice that works fine: Eat food, not too much, mostly plants. Seems doable, and no one had to pitch a fit.
My dad had workout tips: 'If they'd get off their fat asses and swing a hammer they wouldn't be butterballs.' Unkind, but not incorrect.
B) Vegetarians & Vegans push their "diets" with as much vigor as the Paleo crowd. CrossFit vs. Yoga. Again, Who cares.
C) Eat quality food in moderation. You'll be fine.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2014/01…
They were probably from the cork-oak tree, Quercus suber:
http://interculturalmeanderings.wordpres…
A: I hate it when people annoyingly spout pseudoscience.
B: Vegetarian diets are positive for the person (depending on how applied) and much less harmful (not a vegetarian.) It's not a fad.
C: Duh.