Best-dressed, anyone? I vote Lupita, in Nairobi Blue, as her tenth-best dress of the season is still better than anyone else's. Or is it Amy Adams in royal blue? Definitely not Cate Blanchett in nude.
My shitty Costco-bought antenna doesn't have any useful channels so I can't watch! I scoured the web for non-ABC live streams and found nothing. Woe, woe.
The real Captain Phillips is an asshole who deliberately endangered his ship and crew and is widely detested amongst his fellow captains, to say nothing of his crew, which is suing him. Not a hero.
Mrs. Fnarf points out that movies set in recent history always get shafted in costume and set design awards, especially if there's something from the Roaring Twenties up as well. That's so easy. The Seventies or Nineties are much harder to get right -- probably because nobody remembers the Twenties so it doesn't matter how wrong you are as long as you hit your marks with the cliches.
Has there ever actually been a *good* (much less great) Oscar telecast? I think it's an impossibility unless Joan Rivers and Don Rickels co-host it as a roast...
Every time/Any time Bette sings "Wind Beneath My Wings" the camera should be required to cut away to Barbara Hershey (no matter where Ms. Hershey is...at home, driving, etc)
@43: ABC is not providing live streaming in the Seattle market.
@33: You know that http://www.IMDB.com has a Goofs section right? That is where the astute reviews point out the discontinuities, such as in 12 yrs a Slave, where water Hyacinth was in the background, but historically not in the usa until 1930's.
@56, I did not. But now I do. Awesome, and thank you. That spiritual they were singing was suspiciously modern-sounding too. They should have had the actors listen to some Dinwiddie Colored Quartette or something to get the sound at least in the right century.
Riddle me this: why are the boxes so little when they show all the nominees at once? Presenter was in top row, two nominees in row two, three nominees in bottom row. Lots of empty space.
Fnarf, you are an idiot (sometimes) of course Gravity won best director. assembling a film like that was a huge technical achievement. kinda makes up for Nolan not winning for Inception. . .
Then you'd probably better stick to the stage instead of the screen. Technical achievement is intrinsic to film; movies simply wouldn't exist without it.
I would like to thank Mr. Schmader for hosting this magnificent event, and I also have to thank the Renegade Wine Co. of Mattawa, Washington for getting me through it.
At what point did they stop doing the voiceover announcements, as in "This is Cate Blanchett's second Oscar, having won previously for "The Aviator"? And why?
@79, rubbish, total rubbish. The cinematographer and special effects fellows get their own award. Giving a director credit -- awards, even -- for technological achievements instead of artistic ones is exactly why movies are so shitty today.
Thanks, Ellen DeGeneres, for using the punchy, anti-aircraft gun style delivery of Elayne Boosler without any of her rapier wit and pithy lines.
Here are some of the hi-larious non-jokes, carefully documented by USA today which they list as the best lines (?):
• "He's from Somalia — a sommelier — so he knows a lot about wine. That is impressive. Who's the wine captain now?"
• "Who are we kidding, it's The Hunger Games. There's cameras everywhere, you're starving and Jennifer Lawrence won last year."
• "Possibility No. 1: 12 Years a Slave wins best picture. Possibility No. 2: You're all racists. And now, welcome our first white presenter, Anne Hathaway."
@86, I agree with you, but: in the old days a lot of that filler WAS art, in retrospect. B Movies are often terrific. Of course, a lot of them were terrible, and those are a lot less likely to be showing on AMC anytime soon, which distorts the impression, but still.
I would argue that filler is actually more likely to be interesting today than blockbusters, because nothing kills a movie faster than money. I'd like to see guys like Scorsese make movies on $5 million or less. Maybe then they'd focus on the characters and the story and not the whiz-bang. They'd have to get better actors, of course, but good actors come cheaper than bad ones.
ABC's Resurrection is not the american version of The Returned. The American version of Les Revenants is being developed by A&E and possibly Carlton Cuse. Resurrection is based on the novel American novel The Returned by Jason Mott. Not to be confused with NBC's pilot Babylon Fields about dead rising with Skeet Ulrich. Imitation, flattery and so on.
I still can't believe Robert Redford gave the performance of his lifelong acting career only to be left to die in the Indian Ocean?!? Not even a nomination! WTF, Academy?
I wish I could say Julie Delpy was best dressed, but the yahoos on tv never showed her so I can't confirm.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pharrell-William…
Go to antennaweb.org
They will tell you where to point it for each station.
Hollywood is infected.
Fuck you, Tom Laughlin. I saw "Billy Jack". It, and you, were shit, shit, shit.
Elmore Leonard was cool though. And Annette! And Riz Ortolani! And Sid Caesar! And Juanita Moore! Hoffman last, as I said he would be.
http://abc.go.com/watch-live
I do wish the score to the collage hadn't been such a thou-shalt-cry-now John Barry's 'Somewhere in Time'.
Wait, the orchestra is off-site at Capitol Records? Bizarre.
@33: You know that http://www.IMDB.com has a Goofs section right? That is where the astute reviews point out the discontinuities, such as in 12 yrs a Slave, where water Hyacinth was in the background, but historically not in the usa until 1930's.
It's all about the butt-kissing, isn't it?
Fnarf, you are an idiot (sometimes) of course Gravity won best director. assembling a film like that was a huge technical achievement. kinda makes up for Nolan not winning for Inception. . .
Then you'd probably better stick to the stage instead of the screen. Technical achievement is intrinsic to film; movies simply wouldn't exist without it.
There are very few producers trying to make art.
it's the director that puts it all together, if only the special effects and/or cinematography is good you can still have a bad film. . .
Here are some of the hi-larious non-jokes, carefully documented by USA today which they list as the best lines (?):
• "He's from Somalia — a sommelier — so he knows a lot about wine. That is impressive. Who's the wine captain now?"
• "Who are we kidding, it's The Hunger Games. There's cameras everywhere, you're starving and Jennifer Lawrence won last year."
• "Possibility No. 1: 12 Years a Slave wins best picture. Possibility No. 2: You're all racists. And now, welcome our first white presenter, Anne Hathaway."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movie…
Did I get that part right?
I would argue that filler is actually more likely to be interesting today than blockbusters, because nothing kills a movie faster than money. I'd like to see guys like Scorsese make movies on $5 million or less. Maybe then they'd focus on the characters and the story and not the whiz-bang. They'd have to get better actors, of course, but good actors come cheaper than bad ones.