Comments

1
Looks like syndicated content. Probably one of the things helping to keep them afloat. I mean, I have some thoughts about how Business Insider is the worst, but this is only barely the PI's fault. (Same with celeb couples, Snooki's wedding.)
2
the best part is they still make you watch a pre-roll ad before the video.
3
This is the business model of every consumer magazine that exists.
4
@3: yep.

@2: That looks like a garden-variety monetizable video. Usually those aren't engineered by the publication themselves, but (again) syndicated through a third-party, who provides part of the ad revenue in return for distribution/views.
5
Hearst has dumbed down all of their news sites. And they share lots more content than they used to. I'm told Hearst expects Pulitzer-quality reporting but provides almost no resources, financial or otherwise. Oh, well. The U.S. media are controlled by the right, which wants, no, needs an ignorant populace to survive...
6
@5: I wouldn't categorize Hearst media as "right" - perhaps "yellow" as gold inlays at San Simeon.
7
Huh, and here I'd thought seattlepi.com had merged with Buzzfeed ages ago...
8
As stated above, it's not signed off on by the P-I. It states clearly that it's provided by Business Insider. It's probably a sad commentary about the difficulty of staying afloat financially that they have to have provider networks feeding links... but it seems like a bit of a stretch to accuse the P-I of placing this item as if it is news.
9
Sorry, @8, but I completely disagree. It's published as an article on the Seattlepi.com's website--it's their article. They placed it on their own website. It doesn't matter if it originated from the AP, NYT, Business Insider, or Taco Bell itself. It also doesn't matter if they were paid for it or if they paid for it themselves. Seattlepi.com is responsible for its content. And that content is an ad dressed up like an article.
10
I don't find it on the King5.com web site, but they ran this story too, in a morning news feature with video (didn't watch so I can't say if it is the same footage).

If you want to retaliate, take your cravings to Taco Time. NW owned and operated.
11
The PI slowly withered and died over 2009 and 2010. Little remains of it, save its placeholder website for reposted articles from other Hearst publications.

If you use AdBlock and NoScript on the site, each page appears nearly empty of actual content. Of course, staring at a nearly empty page is preferable to being bombarded with the overwhelming onslaught of ads that invades every pixel of the screen.

If you run the stories through an SEO keyword checker, you'll discover what, not who, is the real "editor" of much of the content and find that several, if not most, of the reposted, syndicated articles are little more than clickbait and advertorials that aren't real news articles by any stretch of the imagination.

The very few original articles by local writer(s?) get lost under the mountain of worthless, syndicated crap. It's akin to listening to a local Clear Channel radio station.

Going to the website just makes me angry, bitter, exhausted and sad.

Fortunately, some of PI's former staff can still be found producing excellent journalism like Tom over at Humanosphere.org. Search for them with Google, Twitter, Flickr, etc. and re-discover the journalists and photo journalists that once made the paper great. Every time you find one a little ray of sunshine breaks through the clouds.

Journalism doesn't exist without real journalists. The PI bears witness.
12
@1/3 you're saying the PI editors have no control over what they publish, or the PI doesn't have editors?

Anyway, I gave up on them long ago. Sad.
13
Meh. Stopped reading there when they cut the Facebook comments.
14
Is this you crafting that long-form style?
15
@11: And David Horsey's talent is at the LA Times:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/top…
16
@12,

I don't know if they do, but there are many publications out there that are 100 percent ads. Basically any magazine that's consumer-oriented consists entirely of "articles" about the magazine's advertisers. Vogue, for example, doesn't acknowledge the existence of designers who don't advertise in that magazine.

It stands to reason that this is the new "newspaper" model in the age of free/cheap online content.
17
It's ok, nobody actually reads anymore.
18
@16: Another new model is being implemented by First Look Media. Their first project is the excellent The Intercept, which launched last month.
19
With the waffle taco I really just feel like they're trolling at this point.
20
Your guys' outrage is misplaced. Did you actually read the menu? Just horrific. I think THAT might actually have been a syndicated Onion piece.
21
Which is why local and political reporting by the Stranger is magnified in importance. There is little other counterweight to the Seattle Times.
22
I wrote a couple of album reviews a few years ago for Blogcritics.com, about a month after I stopped contributing to the Seattle Times. Blogcritics is a take-your-chances aggregate of a bunch of unpaid writers, a few of whom were pretty good, and a lot of whom were fairly tired-sounding or pre-opinionated; i.e. "Music of today is crap and all the stuff put out today is worthless and with those tenets in mind I'm now going to review this new electronic album." (I don't know where I fell in the spectrum because I'm terrible at self-assessment, except for never taking that latter position in print.)

The point being, about a month after I wrote a review of the Black Keys' "El Camino" album I discovered it was showing up on the Seattle P-I's website. The P-I was running material from Blogcritics. I don't assume they picked and chose which articles to run with. I would imagine with their skeletal crew they didn't have a checks-and-balances system for farmed content, and I doubted Blogcritics would either.

So literally everyone who wrote a reasoned opinion or a gaseous blubbering tirade for Blogcritics was also writing for the P-I, de facto. That's the business model for mainstream journalism. Content's like oil or polyethylene: It's just expected to be there in indiscriminate mass quantities and the P-I just needs to be the placemat.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.