>" (Just like the guy in the textpic he sent to his mom—although that isn't him in the picture.)"

Yeah, I was thinking that was a very well-composed, lighted photograph with an all-white background, nicely shaved legs, taken just as the drip is at its longest (i.e. done by a progressional).

So that makes it even easier to follow to Dan's advice, "Sorry Mom, one of my goofy friends from college sent it to me and I forwarded to another of our friends but I mistyped or something. **Here's the website it came from**" if there's any chance of Mom thinking the pic was by him or of him.

Some people block photomail. I know I do. Could be Mom never saw it!

What's up with people who are okay with being a piece on the side but not okay with openness? Some might want a chance at being the primary but that can't be the whole story.

A rather nasty practical joke setting this up by Mr Savage, but at least FTWL comes in as handy as ever.

That was hot.

Feigned ignorance is a bit of a problem if his name is really Drew ("sissydru4u") and he lives in San Diego, seeing as how the URL is embedded in the image.

@rob!, nah, the "coincidence" of name & city is why his goofy friend "sent" it to him, and why he sent it on -- makes the humor that much better.

How many bible-belt moms know how to find a URL embedded in an image? I don't see that mom checking for a source. She's going to delete it pronto and pretend it never happened.

Oooh, that works, @8, I'll file it away for future reference!

@9, I shouldn't have said "embedded" like I meant EXIF data or something; it's actually printed on the image (LR corner): http://24.media.tumblr.com/23955bbb36e00…

Still, deletion/never mentioning seems a likely outcome.

As they say on reddit, "r/thathappened". I don't doubt the authenticity of the femdom relationship, but I do doubt the message was ever sent. It's so much hotter (and more likely) to roleplay the humiliation of a mis-sent text, emailed to Dan Savage with the hopes that he'll share sissy's humiliation with the world. If this story is true, well, why would she share the text he sent? It just would make the situation worse. Nope.

Still. As @6 says "fucking hot". Made all the hotter by Dan sharing sissy's humiliation with the the internet. Well played, Dom.

Cute.

@3: The reasoning seems to be that a person who is cheating with you is lured away from their partner by your powerful and dangerous sexiness. And it's so deliciously forbidden. Discovering that it isn't forbidden, and your role is definitely, permanently Piece on the Side, convenient to your sex partner and their spouse and no threat to the marriage, strikes them as permanent second place in a way dangerous irresistible siren did not.

(Anecdotally, women had a much easier time than men finding opp sex partners who thought "sex, no strings, no chance it will become a relationship" was a good deal.)

Rock on, TEXXXT!

So somehow a cuckold fetishist and his partnner got Dan to publish an explicit picture for thousands to see (and free advertising for their site)...I bet he's in heaven.

yay, so nice to have a bit of uplifting reading! thanks Dan and LW!

@17, or maybe the co-worker bull ended it because she seemed like she might be unstable. I think both genders are sometimes unhappy to learn the sex is allowed, and other times up for NSA sex. If TEXXXT is willing to fuck people she doesn't know, she'll probably have an easier time finding NSA fun on AdultFriendFinder than looking around among their friends & coworkers.

@3: "What's up with people who are okay with being a piece on the side but not okay with openness? Some might want a chance at being the primary but that can't be the whole story."

Never been on that side, but I can imagine different reasonings beyond the taboo of "making" the wife cheat (not making excuses for any hypocrisy of those positions, just observing that there are probably more people into being the "other partner" than there are interested in full-transparency poly-play)

* Feels uncomfortable about knowing that she's sleeping with the husband right after and discussing his exploits / having his come eaten as described.
* Feels like they might try to rope him into a threesome or other activities he's not looking for
* Feels uncomfortable about being a tool in someone's active humiliation scene
* Feels uncomfortable knowing that much about the other partner and their preferences versus pretending they don't exist

Again, not justifying this, but I imagine that the consciousness of being respectful to the wife *and* the husband is not something most of these people who jump into bed with a married partner think they're signing up for.

@11: I don't think it has to be fake. My husband accidentally sexted his mom instead of me awhile back.
Since we don't live in the Bible Belt, thank god, a good laugh was had by all and no sleep was lost.

I'm wholly in agreement with Undead Ayn Rand here. I'd consider jumping into bed with someone in an open marriage, maybe, but not with LW. Being uninterested in participating in a severe humiliation scene for a third party isn't the same as being uninterested in someone in an open relationship.

It's also a form of selection bias. By not being up front at first, they're screening out the people who would be most likely to be cool with the arrangement. People who are more NSA are more likely to drop everything when they find out the truth.