Comments

1
Interesting concept, and it seems important to the country. I'm interested to see this exhibit. Great post.
2
Thanks for this, Jen. Its so thoughtfully written.
3
Well written commentary on the problem of cultural representation in art. We read/discuss historical novels that misrepresent cultures, so why shouldn't we read/discuss art in the same way.
5
It always amazes me when people don't read the commentary next to works of art. Excepting the most banal and/or over-the-top examples, they always teach me something I didn't know.
6
I'm a TAM member, I'm a lifelong fan of art of the American West, and I'm looking forward to finally seeing this collection. Wish I could have made it for the opening Nov. 15.

I had a chance to catch a PBS interview with TAM's director and the curator of the new collection. I vaguely recall the interviewer asking if there were any Native American artists in the collection, and they answered there were a few. Trying to make sure the Native American perspective was fairly represented was one of a few delicate issues that came up.

The other big issue was the trust that TAM and the Haub family had to build with each other. TAM had to maintain their institutional credibility and the Haub family had to make sure their gift was going to get the platform they felt it deserved, and not have the following applied to themselves: "Right now, somewhere in the world, someone is representing you and speaking for you without you knowing about it (ADD: until it's too late)." I'm hoping and expecting that once I see the exhibit, I'll be able to (A) give the Haubs credit for letting the museum do its thing, and (B) give TAM credit for not portraying the Haubs as a couple of out-of-touch, old white people (and Europeans, to boot!).

Love the pairing of the iconic George Washington portrait (they've got that?!) with the Ojibwe leader's portrait.
8
These paintings are GOD AWFUL. I would say having to show them is far too high of a price---even with a new wing.
9
Just saw the exhibition last weekend. Many of the paintings are stunning--even if they were created during "problematic" periods of US history. They make you think.
10
RR Anderson, you are a very unpleasant human being. You love to throw the insults around, while you contribute nothing to society. I wish you would just give it a rest already.
11
Time to put comment cards next to all the exhibits in Seattle museums. Also time to put little cultural comment cards in all the great European museums. The majority of these paintings were NOT painted as historical fact or even historical comment. They were painted as art and to create a certain emotion by and for the artist. They represent the view and feelings of the artist. Nothing more, nothing less. It is IDIOTIC to try to force some cultural comment on these works that was never intended by the artist.



I find it interesting that "Tacoma", as usual, finds a way to make a positive (one of the greatest collections of Western art in the world) into a negative. And, of course, Seattle will do its best to help them do so, also, as usual.

Please wait...

Comments are closed.

Commenting on this item is available only to members of the site. You can sign in here or create an account here.


Add a comment
Preview

By posting this comment, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use.