11:45 AM yesterday
commented on The Morning News: Jeff Bezos Getting Even Richer, Hillary Making History, Sawant Alienating Local Dems
@16: "The system is completely broken, but fixing it would take work. Fuck that. The status quo is easy"
If the massive amount of people who are upset because neither party works for them (all middle class and lower class Americans) actually voted for a third party, we could actually have a challenge to the stagnant two party system we are in. But the media and people like you tell them that fixing the system is impossible, so we just have to keep limping along with it.
This system of government was never designed to work with only two options, despite your dependence on not wanting to actually think about who you are voting for.
By the way, I feel obligated to inform you that I am not an entire political party, so I do not have the power to roll out candidates in local or national elections. I am just one voter, you seem to be confused by this.
Also, "smug sanctimony." Stop projecting.
commented on It Has Come to My Attention That Some People Still Haven't Watched Bill Clinton's Speech Last Night at the DNC
@20: Actually #8 brought it up. Also, what agenda? If it is between Hillary and Trump, I will go Hillary every time.
Personally, I just find it very odd that rape and sexual assault stops mattering when Bill Clinton is involved. Do you also find the charges against Cosby to be a ridiculous and delusional distraction? If not, why?
I know you won't answer for real, because you know you can't other than to offer the "vast right wing conspiracy angle" (which is why you immediately went Ad Hominem).
But once again, why is it the women accusing Clinton can be dismissed as bimbos and right wing pawns, but the women who accused Cosby must be telling the truth? Why? What is the difference besides your agenda?