May 13
Boring Dad is Boring commented on
This Is What You Get, Liberals: Obama's Surveillance Scandal.
I have to wonder if people who got swept up in the Barry O. wave don't regret going with Hillary occasionally. Whatever you think of the Clinton machine, they are political beasts who know how to maneuver and how to chainsaw their way through whatever general obstruction or scandal of the month comes along.
I think at this rate there's a good chance that the Obama stink ends up putting some blah GOP clown in office, even if HRC gets the Team Blue nomination.
May 8
Boring Dad is Boring commented on
The American Health Care Market.
@7: The magical health and compassion I witnessed in India involved a very large number of maimed and sick people lying in the streets of multiple cities begging for money, food, or even eye contact, none of which was forthcoming.
Any person in this country can walk (or be carried) into any emergency room and receive care, no matter what.
I think I'll stick with our 'Fascism' a couple more years, thanks.
Apr 27
Boring Dad is Boring commented on
The Saturday Morning News.
15, 16: Nobody who cares about the gun issue believes for a second that the goal is "background checks." It's about political control and an ultimate longer term push toward disempowering people you don't like.
The first section of this post does a good job providing context as to why people might feel this way, if anyone cares to read it:
http://kontradictions.wordpress.com/2013…
Apr 22
Boring Dad is Boring commented on
The Federal Way Shooting Was a Domestic Violence Incident, Say Police.
@1 Thousands of daily victims of "gun violence," yes, if you include suicides, and criminals shooting other criminals while committing additional crimes, and then multiply by ten. Or twelve. Or, to be semantic, twenty four-ish if you really want multiple thousands. Math is NUTS.
To get to thousands of daily victims of anything in the US you need to think more about "metabolic violence" or "cancer violence." But there aren't nearly as many political points to score there, so I'll refrain from committing breath-holding violence on myself waiting for the indignant posts.
To be clear - I have no sympathy to any piece of shit who commits domestic violence, and fully support throwing the book at them. Judges in WA have discretion today to enter orders requiring surrender of firearms when "any party presents a serious and imminent threat to public health or safety, or to the health or safety of any individual." Would be interesting to understand why they don't take advantage of the existing laws on the books.