Jen Graves
report this user
Jul 28, 2016 Jen Graves commented on Could This Lawsuit Change Photo History? A Photographer is Suing Getty for $1 Billion.
@Dunno: I'm genuinely curious. Would you have seen the Hyperallergic story if I hadn't posted this?

Or is your point more that I should have quoted less and just straight-linked with a brief mention that there's great action in the comments?

The one thing I'd disagree with you on is that there's a right way to do online journalism, and we all know what it is. When you get that memo, send it around. I am always trying to figure it out. I think many of us are.

Thanks for reading and for commenting.
Jul 11, 2016 Jen Graves commented on The Queen Protester of Baton Rouge: An Art Review.
YES! I didn't even notice those, Tim.

Um, folks, Tim Keck is the publisher of this here rag. He, as this insightful comment makes evident, is the reason why an art critic is still working full-time in Seattle. And no, I'm not brownnosing. I've been here too long (and I'm too cranky) for that. Seriously. I dig this comment!
Mar 24, 2016 Jen Graves commented on Ask Us Anything About Our Caucus Endorsement(s).
@emma's bee: Should be "impractical, pie-in-the-sky candidate"
Mar 24, 2016 Jen Graves commented on Ask Us Anything About Our Caucus Endorsement(s).
@emma's bee: I'm so glad you asked this question. Yes, there were really no women caucusing the SECB for Hillary. Here is how the vote broke down in the room at the end of the day: Angela Garbes, Heidi Groover, Ana Sofia Knauf, Sydney Brownstone, and Jen Graves for Bernie Sanders (we had the majority) versus Dan Savage, Tim Keck, Christopher Frizzelle, and Rich Smith for Hillary Clinton (Sean Nelson was present but abstained).

As for the question of pragmatism, I think it's a good one. My take—and the other women should join in with theirs here, because I'm certainly not speaking for all of us—is that Hillary is not necessarily a pragmatic choice at all, because she could easily lose in November for many reasons. And this is a caucus.

Beyond that, for me there is of course the problem that there is nothing pragmatic about the current machine, which Hillary embodies and shape-shifts to match.

Casting Bernie as the impractical, pie-in-the-sky plays into the hands of those who'd like to see this country continue its accelerating race to the right. I liked what Charles wrote this morning: "Enough is enough. The press in the US and UK needs to stop lumping Sanders with Trump and other loonies. Sanders is not saying crazy things. He might be the most normal presidential candidate in the history of the United States. All of this lumping business is about distorting this obvious fact—he is a very rational, very sane politician. Hillary Clinton is madder than Sanders."

I want to be part of a crew that at least tries to help remind people that Sanders actually is the pragmatic choice.
More...
Nov 20, 2015 Jen Graves commented on The New Foundation Creates 100K Prize for a "U.S.-Based Woman Artist in Honor of Her Exemplary Artistic Achievements".
Note: I forgot to mention that the award is open to all female-identifying artists, including transgender artists.
May 28, 2015 Jen Graves commented on You Know That One Thing You're Not Allowed to Talk About? That's the Subject of Akio Takamori's Ceramics.
@1: I don't know, but I imagine Akio would love that.
Dec 22, 2014 Jen Graves commented on How a Jesuit College Came to Commission Gratia Plena, One of Seattle's Most Progressive Public Sculptures.
@1: Hope you saw the embedded link to your piece in the story.
Dec 18, 2014 Jen Graves commented on "All Speculations Are Equally Speculative": The "Conclusion" of Serial.
I'll jump in now. I didn't expect to hear who did it. But I think there is a real story here, and it's not just about the "nature of truth" stuff: it's the difference between what a person believes and what a juror does, and I don't think she nailed that. I wanted more on that issue and how it plays out. My displeasure was more about style. Too much wandering around in the woods out loud!
Nov 26, 2014 Jen Graves commented on Rodrigo Valenzuela Wins Artist Trust's (Second) Biggest Award After Having Lost Its Smallest Award Many Times.
For several days I've been waiting for a response from Barbara Mizoguchi after another artist pinged me to say he was pretty sure Gary Hill was indeed on the jurying panel that gave Rodrigo the award. I knew, again, that he was on the preliminary panel, but Barbara wrote me in email that Gary was absolutely not part of Rodrigo's selection in any way.

Yesterday I got an apology from Barbara, and an admission that in fact the finalist panel that included Gary did oversee choosing Rodrigo.

Obviously, I was part of awarding Rodrigo the Genius Award from the Stranger, and I've written critically about his work in a way that makes it clear I think it's strong, important, and growing. So I have no doubt that Rodrigo deserved the Innovators Award as much as anyone deserves anything.

That said, I'm all about disclosure. So now you have full disclosure, which I was trying to get you from the start. Frustrating. But, I hope, case closed with all the info out there.
Nov 7, 2014 Jen Graves commented on Rodrigo Valenzuela Wins Artist Trust's (Second) Biggest Award After Having Lost Its Smallest Award Many Times.
Barbara Mizoguchi, Artist Trust Grants Manager, said panelists from one medium do not judge in other mediums. Gary Hill did not jury Rodrigo's work. Just FYI.