Line Out Music & the City at Night

Friday, February 3, 2012

E-Mail Never Sleeps

Posted by on Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Screen_shot_2012-02-03_at_10.29.01_AM.png

My inbox bares, on average, 200-300 e-mails a day. E-mails from PR people, bands, co-workers, spambots, and scammers, emails with subject lines in ALL CAPS, emails with blank subject lines, e-mails written in foreign languages, emails sent to the wrong person (Yes I have a spam filter. No it doesn't catch everything, in fact sometimes it grabs things I actually want.) Let's not even start with the people who hit me up on Facebook about work shit. This is a problem for me, because I can never have anything in my inbox because something in my inbox means my mind is not at ease.

I have a folder called "Priority," which is rather ill-defined and in need of a new name, then one called "to-do," which is also rather ill-defined, and gets a combover once a week and still never stops growing. Then I have folders for everything you see at right. Thing is, I STILL MISS STUFF, and it keeps me awake at night. How do you handle your inbox, and how's it working for you?

 

Comments (27) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
I set up a rule that everything shunted into spam or trash gets marked as read - having the number "45,364" sitting there is something I just couldn't handle.
Posted by gloomy gus on February 3, 2012 at 10:56 AM
Grant Brissey, Emeritus 2
Interesting, gus. I never even notice it, but now I probably will. THANKS A LOT.
Posted by Grant Brissey, Emeritus http://www.grantropolis.com/ on February 3, 2012 at 11:00 AM
3
I try to keep my number of unread messages down to zero (there's one floating around in there somewhere, but I think its importance has probably passed), but you folks you actually keep your inbox empty are astounding to me. I have over 9000 messages in my inbox. Sometimes I go on archiving jags and get that down a bit, but generally my inbox is a full and bustling place. The only things that really cry out to me are unread messages.
Posted by Levislade http://ballofwax.org on February 3, 2012 at 11:02 AM
4
No matter what I'm doing I check my email the second I get it. I then either reply (if it's quick, or i'm not doing anything pressing at the moment) (in the middle of typing that parenthetical I got an responded to an email) or put it on my paper to-do list.

The to-do list is created in the morning and after my lunch is rewritten with all my new stuff put into order of importance. It's a little obtuse but it's worked for me so far.
Posted by milleribsen on February 3, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Will in Seattle 5
Lucky!

I have eight inboxes. My work one gets 100-200 emails that aren't sorted, and 200+ that go in various folders (Science, Lists, Computer News). I triage that - most email from MSFT i look at the titles for the articles and press delete. Always read GCN. Read mail goes in folders or sub folders or sub sub folders. Replies I read and delete. Spam that makes it past filters I delete.

My seven other inboxes are for home. Twitter and FB are my real inboxes. If it was important enough someone would have phoned me or sent me something on FB or Twitter.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Kenneth 6
Get another intern.
Posted by Kenneth http://offtempo.com on February 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Cracker Jack 7
The only things that sit in the inbox are those which require action by me. Once action has happened, it goes into a folder. If it's just informational, it goes in a folder.

That way the only stuff in the inbox is what needs to be acted on -- anything else, I can go to its folder and see only that topic.

Works very well for me.
Posted by Cracker Jack on February 3, 2012 at 11:21 AM
8
Grant: You seem like someone who's read "Getting Stuff Done," by David Allen. It's a great book and preaches the importance of not using your inbox as a to-do list. I have followed Allen's advice in that a few times a day I work through items in my in box. When doing so, if an e-mail creates a task that takes less than 2 minutes to complete, I do it right then (shoot off a quick e-mail, update a password, etc.). If it takes longer than 2 minutes, I drag it into the to-do folder. If it's spam or not actionable, I delete it right away. If I'll need it later for reference, I save it off to my alphabetical electronic filing system. Once done working through all new e-mails, I switch to the to-do folder and scan and pick and choose what to do. Depending on my energy level, I either tackle hard stuff or, on Friday afternoons when I'm feeling burned out, I try to pick off easy tasks. If at any time I think of something I need to do, I write myself an e-mail, send it, and then later move it into the to-do folder. If something comes up that needs to be done by a certain time, I write myself a calendar item to remind myself to do it. Allen's book has been awesome for me. For anyone feeling overwhelmed with tasks and needing to get organized, it offers a good solution.
Posted by David from Chicago on February 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM
gloomy gus 9
@2, I always assume the unread email is the one from some ex, telling me either that on reflection I was the best they'll ever have, or that I should check for the herp. Maybe both.
Posted by gloomy gus on February 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM
barzen 10
You have a folder for "REGRETS"?
Posted by barzen on February 3, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Will in Seattle 11
@9 I actually get along with my exes. Helping one set up her new Disney retirement package. So I read those. It's the stuff from people trying to sell me stuff that I delete.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 3, 2012 at 11:38 AM
12
By the way, I took some workshop on how to effectively interview one time and it suggested asking interviewees the question "How do you stay organized at work?" The answer you want to hear is like Grant's or @7. A bad answer is "I just try to stay organized..." This is a good question to prepare for if you're in the job market and the job involves juggling tasks.
Posted by David from Chicago on February 3, 2012 at 11:39 AM
13
+1 for Getting Things Done.
Posted by Patrick McGrath on February 3, 2012 at 11:40 AM
emor 14
@10: Presumably for the annual Regrets issue.

I only get about 150 emails a week, total, so I generally just respond right away. The things that my job requires me to do usually are not communicated via email. I do have a couple gigabytes of mail stored away on a couple different servers, just in case. For some reason that fact drives my wife crazy. She deletes everything all of the time.
Posted by emor on February 3, 2012 at 11:50 AM
Grant Brissey, Emeritus 15
@ David: I haven't read the book, but I did hear a radio interview with Allen, and I observe the 2 minute rule, and often preach it. Now I shall read the book.
Posted by Grant Brissey, Emeritus http://www.grantropolis.com/ on February 3, 2012 at 11:52 AM
biffp 16
@7, totally agree with that. The rule should be two minutes, and it goes somewhere. Can't just keep re-reading old e-mails.
Posted by biffp on February 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM
17
I have, as of this moment, 36,148 emails in my in box. I've better things to do with my time than sitting around sorting emails. If I need to find something I simply use the search function.
Posted by PaulBarwick on February 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM
T 18
gmail ftw!
Posted by T on February 3, 2012 at 12:08 PM
seandr 19
@8, @12: "Getting Stuff Done," by David Allen

I can't remember if it was this guy or some other bullshitting corporate self-help guru executive management consulting charlatan wearing Italian loafers, but about 10 years ago everyone at MSFT was forced to take his stupid class.

This is not "getting stuff done", it's "getting yourself lost in process so you can avoid getting stuff done."

For about a couple of weeks afterwards, everyone was followed his system and wouldn't shut the fuck up about it. Then, suddenly, everyone returned to normal operations, and it was as it it never happened.
Posted by seandr on February 3, 2012 at 12:20 PM
TVDinner 20
We own our domain, so I have several accounts I use for different purposes and can create a new one whenever I need it. There's my public account, used for things like registering on Slog, ordering crap from Woot!, and receiving updates on The Great Political Issue of the Day, and then there's my friends account. I have a more formal, professional account for the resume and work/school-related stuff, and then an account used strictly for a part- part- part-time job I do a few hours a month.

If stuff needs doing I leave it marked as unread until I can get to it. Usually that's in the wee hours of the morning before the craziness of the day kicks in. Works so far.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on February 3, 2012 at 12:28 PM
Fnarf 21
@5, does this explain why you garble even the most basic information about pretty much everything? Like your twit yesterday "@TheDailyShow besides 5 million infected bot net Droids have to do something ....", which proves you don't read your ultra-top computer news email carefully enough to know that a Droid (the phone model made by Motorola) is not the same thing as Android (the operating system that it and a million other phone models run), or that there is no "bot net" (which people who actually read computer news call "botnet") on Android, but rather a promotional campaign by Symantec to sell more of their worthless antivirus for phones. This "botnet" you've skimmed articles about is an agressive ad network, not a botnet in any meaningful sense of the word.

And of course it doesn't affect "Droids" but Android.

Is it possible that your extensively documented counterfactual flailings are the result of information overload? Or are you just too stupid to read email? I'm sticking with "too stupid".

http://blog.mylookout.com/blog/2012/01/2…

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/21/…
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM
22
@19 Getting Things (Stuff?) Done is not for everyone. Early in my career, when I had more linear jobs that did not involve 100 items hitting my in box a day, I didn't need to be organized. It was a pleasure to be unorganized back then. But when my job changed and I got more busy, I starting with to-do lists and whatnot and then I read GTD. Once I read it, I switched to Allen's system because it was better than whatever I could invent myself.
Posted by David from Chicago on February 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM
23
lol I empty my inbox every day. I put stuff to do in another folder (I comb thru it frequently and nothing is allowed to be older than a month) and file anything important (such as correspondence I need a record of). I delete anything that isn't important.

It sounds so simple to me but I don't know anyone else who can do it!!

Also bear in mind - I work in an office where organization is a priority!! So I have mad skillz. : D
Posted by subwlf on February 3, 2012 at 1:23 PM
24
Ooookay here we go.

I have 3 mailboxes I care about: 1) 15+ year old "personal" address at my very first ISP that I still pay $5/month for, 2) GMail -- used mainly for commercial stuff and personal emails with not-close-friends, 3) Work

Then I keep a couple aliases around that point to my GMail account so I can, for example, put "webspamjan2012@privatedomain.com" (which forwards to GMail) into websites for a while, and maybe delete it if I want to. One of my aliases has been around forever and gets all the stuff from places I deal with often like Amazon, Newegg, every bank, every bill, etc.

My personal email account (#1) receives very little mail (maybe 10-20 messages per month) and 80%+ of it is from human beings I know who I actually want to talk to sending me personal messages (not forwarded "funny" shit). There is no fancy filtering -- just one "big" Inbox. I don't give this email out to anyone but close(-ish) friends/family. It gets zero spam and I've had it for 15 years.

My GMail account (#2) is where I give less fucks. There are some minor filter rules on it like all my @uw.org email goes to a certain folder, all my automatic payment bills go to a certain folder, and a couple others; there are about 5 folders total and I rarely mess with the filter settings. This box gets 20-30 emails per day and maybe 1 spam message every 1-2 months. It has probably 4-5 actively used aliases on other domains pointing at it.

And my work account is heavily filtered. First into automatic system messages vs. human messages. Then into automatic system messages I actually care about and ones I ignore 99% of the time. Humans get split up by their department within the company, or in to mailing lists. Some of the folders each of these groups are split into are then "unsubscribed" from so I don't actually see the folders day to day, but I can go "subscribe" to the folder and get the messages if I want to see them.

As a result of all of this, I rarely have more than 1-2 unread messages in either of my personal accounts, and rarely more than 20-30 things unread in my work account.

All of my filtering is done on the server-side using procmail (an oldschool and extremely flexible filtering program for Unix-based systems) -- I have zero filters in my clients of choice (Thunderbird and OSX Mail) and this is a best practice: you want all your filtering done on the server, not on the client.

I never delete any email and have mostly complete email archives going back to about 1994, when I was 11 years old and using AOL. I probably have 95% of every email I've ever sent or received in my life. This is not overwhelming because it's all well organized. About 5 years ago I broke off an archive and use an alternate system go get into emails older than about 5 years (which is very rare, but occasionally happens).

FINALLY, I hate email -- it is extremely inefficient, prone to all sorts of random problems, mail servers are a pain in the ass to maintain and fix, and it is used for about a million things it was never designed to do. At every single opportunity I steer my company towards using anything but email (ticketing systems, instant messaging, VPN and network sharing, collaborative software suites).

I have learned that it is a huge yellow flag if your company runs entirely on gigantic emails that have been forwarded between 3 departments and have CC lists 15 people long. Most people don't realize how extremely inefficient this is.
More...
Posted by Swearengen on February 3, 2012 at 2:23 PM
25
Work email--delete everything that my boss sends unread on principle because she's crazy and I hate her. Anything from customers gets addressed immediately, everything else is considered briefly before being dismissed.
Posted by catballou on February 3, 2012 at 3:09 PM
care bear 26
You don't want to read that one email in valuable information? But it's valuable!
Posted by care bear on February 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM
27
GTD is good and worth reading, even if you don't use all of it. Merlin Mann has some good stuff too on the 43 Folders blog and the Back to Work podcast. If you are using mac/iphone/ipad, omnifocus is a nice GTD app that plays well with Mail.app and Postbox. You can send e-mails directly to OF as a task.

The inbox zero idea is that the inbox is a holding tank/triage area. whether you're deleting a mail or moving it to another place, the goal is to look at the mail in the Inbox and then do something with it.

If it's less than two minutes, just respond. Otherwise, put in a to-do folder mark it with a star, tag it, send it to an omnifocus project, or whatever. The key is putting it somewhere that you can retrieve and keep track of it, so it doesn't fall through the cracks.

While I'm bad about doing this, many gtd people suggest it's best to look at e-mail only a few time a day, particularly if you have other more focused work to do that is undermined by too many interruptions. One approach some people seem to use is to process e-mail in the morning (i.e, respond to short ones and triage the rest). Then compose messages requiring more time later in the day. If you try this,you may need to train certain people that they can't expect an immediate response from you anymore.

The thing that I found particularly helpful about gtd is that it encourages you to break things down into discrete action steps and focus on one at a time while leaving the other stuff for later. Much less overwhelming.

That said, for this to work, you have to commit to stepping back from the barrage of stuff long enough to think about the steps that are usually required to do some of it. Of course, this works better for projects where the action steps tend to repeat again and again. For the purposes of GTD, a project is anything you are trying to do that requires more than one action step to complete. I bet if you think about it, you will see that in your job, there are a fair amount of projects with repeatable steps, given that you are processing a lot of inputs and outputs of content.

Once you look at workflows, it's easier to create a set of project templates in a program like omnifocus and keep track of progress on your various projects. Or at least keep the steps in your head. It also makes it easier to develop templates and other automation strategies for speeding up certain steps in the process (e.g., around e-mail).

On practical level, I personally prefer Postbox or Thunderbird to Mail.app. The many add-ons available for TB (and to a lesser extent PB) can really help speed up certain things. In particular, Quicktext Pro for TB/PB allows you to create templates you can use for replying to repetitive e-mails (thereby turning more e-mails into <2 minutes affairs). So much easier to just type something like "bcq" Press the tab key and then have it automatically create most of the e-mail you'll need to respond to a certain sort of request you have received. Honestly, I think Outlook would probably be better than Mail.App too. None of these programs look quite as good as Mail.app, but most of them provide a few more tools than does mail.app for handling e-mail in a work context. That said, between mailtags and omnifocus, it seems like there are people who have build systems around mail.app that they really like. And mail.app does have the best mac integration, including a more full-featured applescript dictionary, which can be useful sometimes, if you are geeky enough (I'm not), or you find stuff that more geeky people have created.

In my work, have to send out a lot of documents. So I have a document cover template in quicktext pro that helps to speed up that process. I create a new message and attach a file. Then I actuate the template. It pops a series of dialog boxes asking me for file type and file description. Then it creates an e-mail pulling in the name of the file and the other boilerplate. Doing this turned a 5-7 minute process into a 2 minute one. It also cut down on errors. Maybe that doesn't seem like that big of an improvement, but if you need to do it a lot, it is.

You can accomplish some of the same things in mail.app by using textexpander. I think mailtags might also give you some of those options. But quicktext pro is better.

Beyond that, I also agree with other folks that where possible it's important to try and drive as much superfluous e-mail away from the main inbox (e.g., listerves, etc.). I've have worked sporadically on a virtual basis for an organization that sends out a lot of FYI e-mails and things like that. These are almost never relevant to me. So I filtered them out of the main inbox. That literally cut in half the e-mail I received on that account and made it much easier to see the stuff that was important.
More...
Posted by j-lon on February 4, 2012 at 11:49 AM

Add a comment

 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy