I don't understand why Burgess would try to go after transportation at all. McGinn has a cohesive vision that's winning federal funds (and that means jobs for us) and working with Sound Transit to accelerate more light rail. We know we can't do all this with buses and pothole fixes. McGinn is dealing with the day to day, which Burgess seems unaware of, and he's looking way past that at ways to build infrastructure that will last.
And this entire time no one has yet to give a good answer for why a light rail is more effective then a bus. The last time trains were as slow as the Seattle Light Rail was 1835. The purpose of a train is to go fast - 35 MPH isn't fast. Even the Dallas light rail manages 50. And why do you have buses and light rail sharing a tunnel? Doesn't it make more sense to have the bus line end at the rail line? Unless, of course, your train is no better than a bus and considerably more expensive.
Not that Burgess's plan is much better. Frankly, it's about time that Seattlites just realized that their planners are worthless idiots, gave up, and saved a whole lot of tax money (or public service money, or parks money, or education money...) spent hunting unicorns.
Light rail in the abstract is great. Virtually everything about Sound Transit -- its unaccountable board, its abusive regressive taxing, its glacially-slow pace, its inability to foster private development near the stations -- is completely FUBAR.
Fuck McGinn. The guy is an epic piece of shit. How can you understand a word that guy is saying when he has so much SPD penis shoved into his fat foaming mouth?
The cost of (including right-of-way) for at-grade rail travel per passenger mile does not, and never will, support rail transit in the Seattle area.
Rubber-based variable-energy-mode vehicles can travel over dedicated surface, general access, all-purpose, AND elevated surfaces, unlike trolleys or light rail.
They're just more utilitarian on multiple surface types and grades. Plus, they can be built in Washington to our specifications, rather than adapted from some other system design.
what "wroks" the world over is subways and elevated lines that go fast. and you need the whole system; lines covering various parts of the city and meeting in and around downtown. what we are building here is not such a sytem. it's basically "one line" in seattle; you need really several. then, it goes on the surface ensuring slower trains and limited capacity. when we build the ship canal tunnel, guess what, it's capacity is maxed out meaning no other lines from north seattle can be hooked up to help that system growth. and we will be putting more stations in bellevue than in north seattle, so we're not really building the normal kind of system. add to this the sounder north fiasco, a billion in capital wasted for 6000 rides a day (on days without mudslides), and sound transit really isn't doing much -- oh wait, they did help kill the monorail in a fit of pique. in this context mcginn is no hero. he has NO plan for rail to ballard or west seattle -- and we're going to get rail to ballard quicker by waiting for skytrain from vancouver to be extended there than we will by hoping that seattle politicians do it. seriously, you want more rail in seattle, just hand over authority to skytrain in vancouver, they are adding lines about 3x faster than we are.
Rubber-based variable-energy-mode vehicles can travel over dedicated surface, general access, all-purpose, AND elevated surfaces, unlike trolleys or light rail.
They're just more utilitarian on multiple surface types and grades. Plus, they can be built in Washington to our specifications, rather than adapted from some other system design.
We won't.