Slog Comments

 

Comments (5) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
It make sense that capitalism would be more or less compatible with sharia law. The Prophet Mohammed was after all a business man. He understood the importance trade far better than Jesus of Nazareth.
Posted by Ken Mehlman on December 19, 2011 at 9:08 AM
bedipped 2
Is this buying him access to the tweets and accounts of the Arab Spring? Sounds like a good security investment.

It's not clear to my why Marxism could not function under sharia law.
Posted by bedipped on December 19, 2011 at 9:10 AM
gloomy gus 3
I read awhile back that he and Bill Gates bought the Four Seasons together. Not this hotel or that, but the worldwide thing.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 19, 2011 at 9:23 AM
Salmon 4
While I overall agree with this post, there are a couple of minor technicalities:

Saudi Arabia isn't really Sharia law, it's Wahabbism (not much better, obviously.) Strict Sharia law also has laws against "Usury" that prevent traditional Capitalist practices like interest rates, investment banking, etc. So Capitalism and Sharia wouldn't get along well in the strictest sense, but Capitalism and religious fanaticism seem to strangely coexist rather well in most cases.
Posted by Salmon http://salmon-leap.blogspot.com on December 19, 2011 at 10:09 AM
5
Yeah. No totalarian country has ever embraced the theories of Marx and through it devalued women.

Oh. Wait.
Posted by tkc on December 19, 2011 at 11:22 AM

Add a comment