Slog Comments


Comments (6) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
hans millionaire 7
what Paul? no comment on how this is Amazon's attempt at buying up the review network, to favor their publications in the future reviews? wow, Paul has become an Amazon lover after all?
Posted by hans millionaire on March 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM · Report this
laterite 5
I cannot detect one scintilla of snide or passive-aggressive commentary regarding Amazon in this post. My world is turned upside down.
Posted by laterite on March 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM · Report this
sikandro 4
Agree with Fnarf about New York Review of Books, and also London Review of Books is stellar.
Posted by sikandro on March 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM · Report this
What's so bad about the NYT Book Review? I read and enjoy it every week.
Posted by mitten on March 14, 2012 at 4:49 PM · Report this
Fnarf 2
The New York Times Book Review has never been all that good, really. The good book paper with "New York" in the name has always been The New York Review of Books.
Posted by Fnarf on March 14, 2012 at 4:47 PM · Report this
I see no possible reason why it would be a bad idea for a book review site to take money from a book publisher.
Posted by Asbel on March 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM · Report this

Add a comment

Commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.