Slog Comments

 

Comments (7) RSS

Newest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
hans millionaire 7
what Paul? no comment on how this is Amazon's attempt at buying up the review network, to favor their publications in the future reviews? wow, Paul has become an Amazon lover after all?
Posted by hans millionaire on March 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM · Report this
6
Paul, you need to elaborate on your opinion about The New York Times Book Review.
Posted by You can't make a judgment like that without elaborating. on March 14, 2012 at 5:34 PM · Report this
laterite 5
I cannot detect one scintilla of snide or passive-aggressive commentary regarding Amazon in this post. My world is turned upside down.
Posted by laterite on March 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM · Report this
sikandro 4
Agree with Fnarf about New York Review of Books, and also London Review of Books is stellar.
Posted by sikandro on March 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM · Report this
3
What's so bad about the NYT Book Review? I read and enjoy it every week.
Posted by mitten on March 14, 2012 at 4:49 PM · Report this
Fnarf 2
The New York Times Book Review has never been all that good, really. The good book paper with "New York" in the name has always been The New York Review of Books.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 14, 2012 at 4:47 PM · Report this
1
I see no possible reason why it would be a bad idea for a book review site to take money from a book publisher.
Posted by Asbel on March 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM · Report this

Add a comment