Slog Comments

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
Sigh
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 4, 2012 at 2:11 PM
2
Balancing the budget was the goal for Republicans during the regular session. When it was their job. The only job legislators MUST do, balance the budget, wasn't important to fag lover democraps then, though. Nah, faggots had to destroy marriage before the budget became important.

Fags should have to pay for these special sessions, or the leeches democraps cater to in the social services/lazy baby making bastards complex, or any of the other idiots that make up the democrap base.
Posted by blamethefaggots on April 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM
Daddy Love 3
Surely your cynical take on those poor Republicans is incorrect. After all, everything that we have learned about them says that...oh, those bastards. The bastards.
Posted by Daddy Love on April 4, 2012 at 2:22 PM
4
So actual Republicans want smaller government. Who would have thought? And actual Democrats, as per your post yesterday, want higher taxes. It's so good to have this all clarified.

Here's hoping voters will take this to heart in November. If you want higher taxes, vote D. If you want smaller government, vote R.
Posted by David Wright on April 4, 2012 at 2:32 PM
5
@ 2, you're so right. My marriage was totally destroyed when the Governor signed the marriage bill.
Posted by sall on April 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM
6
"... the Republicans and their couple of faux-Dem allies sure do seem determined to use this latest revenue shortfall as an opportunity to permanently downsize state government... the real goal is to use the act of balancing the budget as an opportunity for reducing state worker pension and health care benefits, and eliminating entire programs."

GOOD
Posted by Reader01 on April 4, 2012 at 2:46 PM
7
In a twisted way, isn't this good news? Because isn't the AG prevented from fundraising while the legislature is in session?
Posted by Reader/Poster on April 4, 2012 at 2:52 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Good point, @7.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM
9
@7:

Good point. And he helped drive a wedge between the sides with his meddling call-out of Frank Chopp the other day.

Perhaps what will eventually lead to a resolution of the budget problem is when the legislators realize that their campaign coffers are empty (and not refillable).
Posted by N in Seattle http://peacetreefarm.org on April 4, 2012 at 3:06 PM
10
Arrrgghhhhh!! I'm channeling WiS.
Posted by N in Seattle http://peacetreefarm.org on April 4, 2012 at 3:07 PM
11
I can fix Washington's budget problems once and for all: a state Constitutional amendment that prohibits municipalities from receiving more from the state than they pay in. Instant budget cut, affecting only those who are demanding budget cuts. Win-win-win.
Posted by also on April 4, 2012 at 3:15 PM
12
After 3+ decades of lies, GOPers still dare to claim they want "small" government but all they have ever created is big government that enables plundering of the public treasury by their corporate cronies. Just trust corrupt Republicans to lower compensations for workers and employees who already pay a greater share of their income in regressive taxes than the 1%ers do. GOPers are despicable social Darwinists who want to destroy the middle class, even pro-corporate Obama appears to think so.
Posted by anon1256 on April 4, 2012 at 3:16 PM
Will in Seattle 13
Soon you shall join the Dark Side, young padawan @10.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 4, 2012 at 3:39 PM
14
If the R's want to force another special session, the Governor should call it to begin the very next day after the end of the first special. Don't give McKenna any relief from the campaign fundraising prohibition.
Posted by Citizen R on April 4, 2012 at 5:23 PM
MrBaker 15
Gosh, I told you so.

Next, the Dems should consider a revenue bill that supports a sustainable budget going into the future and force the Republicans to vote against the sustainable budget.
This should take 29 days, or more.
Tax fairness bill, 2012.
Posted by MrBaker http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ on April 4, 2012 at 8:27 PM
16
Zarelli has been consistent. He submits that simply balancing the budget this biennium without significant reform just will leads to bigger deficits next biennium.

Posted by bornhere on April 4, 2012 at 10:55 PM
17
The Republicans want to drown government in the bathtub and then blame the murder on the Democrats, when people find out just what they've lost. They are trying to force Gregoire into making across-the-board cuts.

Does anyone know for certain when this special-session BS has to stop? Is there a time limit, or a date limit, on special sessions?

Posted by sarah70 on April 4, 2012 at 11:23 PM

Add a comment