Slog Comments

 

Comments (33) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Gay Dude for Romney 1
Dick move by team Obama boomerangs delightfully.
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on April 12, 2012 at 9:06 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 2

How did SLOG/Savage miss this one:

As such, Mels van Driel’s With the Hand: A history of masturbation is a rare and welcome exploration of the topic. With a distinct lack of similar historical texts available, Van Driel attempts to cover all the bases, guiding the reader through a swift - if sometimes superficial - tour of the scientific, medical and religious aspects of the practice, along with a more cultural take through the study of art, literature and philosophy.


http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/cultur…
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on April 12, 2012 at 9:14 AM
Xenos 3
Ann Romney has never worried about money a day in her life.

FTFY
Posted by Xenos on April 12, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Xenos 4
Also, tough break on that Fox mole business. Obviously he's no True Conservative(TM) if he can't cover his tracks.
Posted by Xenos on April 12, 2012 at 9:23 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 5
Hilary Rosen's response to the whole Ann Romney controversy. Makes sense to me.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on April 12, 2012 at 9:23 AM
gloomy gus 6
Speaking of the New York gay marriage win, Bill Keller of the NYT published a big piece for the upcoming Sunday magazine about how the "turncoat" Republican legislators who decided to change their minds and vote to legalize aren't facing anything like the reelection challenge they'd been threatened with. It's a good read:
Many gays still experience America as intolerant, even menacing. But if the experience of New York’s Republican dissenters teaches us anything, it is how quickly the political tide is turning, how quickly the “untraditional” is becoming normal. Is it moving quickly enough that the Supreme Court, where the issue may be headed via a California test case, will decide the country is ready to accept gay marriage as a constitutional right? Quickly enough that the issue could be an asset, or at least not a liability, if Cuomo runs for president in 2016? Neither would surprise me. At the very least, voting for gay marriage, even if you are a Republican politician from the heartland, is not the risk it would have been just a couple of years ago. The four defectors aren’t guaranteed re-election. But if they lose, it is likely to be in spite of their marriage vote, not because of it.
“The earth didn’t stop spinning,” Alesi said. “The moon didn’t fall into the pond. The people who live across the street are still the same people, except that they’re married.”
Alesi is not the type to echo McDonald’s chorus of “Take the job and shove it,” but he clings to something that lawmakers rarely get from working in Albany, a sense of having done something worthwhile and a little brave.
“At the end of the day, wherever I end up, we’ll have marriage equality in New York State,” he told me. “There isn’t anything you can point to in a political career, if you’re just looking over the years you served, that you can say was as big as this.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/15/magazi…
More...
Posted by gloomy gus on April 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM
7
"Raising" kids with the help of nannies, cooks and maids does not equal "working".
Posted by Vitriolforbreakfast on April 12, 2012 at 9:30 AM
8
Put it in context, Gay Dude. What Rosen meant was that Ann Romney had never worked in the labor force, other than maybe as a member of a charity board somewhere, or something like that. She's never lived off a regular paycheck or a salary, so she can't relate with the professional and unemployment pressures of regular non-rich voters. The way Rosen phrased it, and taken out of context, it certainly could be interpreted to mean that stay-at-home mothers don't do anything with their day. Team Romney dearly needs something to take against Obama in front of women voters, something clean and simple that can be turned into a slogan, and this is a gift for them.

And BTW good luck with your gay rights in a Romney administration.
Posted by floater on April 12, 2012 at 9:37 AM
emma's bee 9
This is pretty unbelievable: by all appearances, a federal worker at the Library of Congress was fired for being gay. His EEO complaint probably won't go anywhere b/c sexual orientation is not protected under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/library_of_…
Posted by emma's bee on April 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM
dwightmoodyforgetsthings 10
Good for the judge, the tracks aren't particularly dangerous and it's not like they're hidden. Cycling isn't for wimps (which is why so few conservatives do it.)

@9- That's pretty shocking. Libraries are usually very open-minded work places.
Posted by dwightmoodyforgetsthings http://www.reddit.com/r/spaceclop on April 12, 2012 at 9:46 AM
camlux 11
Chihuly: "If I had a rocket launcher, some chunk of glass would die...."
Posted by camlux on April 12, 2012 at 9:51 AM
reverend dr dj riz 12
@1 .. . you'd think i remember that there are log cabin and aunt jemima republicans..but i always forget. damn me..
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on April 12, 2012 at 9:54 AM
reverend dr dj riz 13
@11.. nice cockburn reference
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on April 12, 2012 at 9:55 AM
JF 14
@7 Sure it does. Management is the toughest job of them all.
Posted by JF on April 12, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Hernandez 15
@12 And paid Romney campaign staffers too, Riz. @1 registered specifically to post that comment, and I'm sure we'll see many more of its type in the run up to November.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on April 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In 16
@8 Wow, trying to teach a conservative about to concept of context. I admire your dedication, sir, although I think it's like trying to teach a mule to sing.

For them, facts only exist to squawk about the horrors of hippie-liberal-commies. Everything else can be, should be & is ignored.
Posted by Some Old Nobodaddy Logged In on April 12, 2012 at 10:09 AM
17
@10 nails it. the tracks aren't difficult to navigate at all. i don't get the whining from seattle bikers. i biked through this intersection daily, along w/ thousands of others.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/51555770@N0…

not just tracks but cobblestones, aloof pedestrians, pigeons galore, dogs, turning trams, buses, the occasional car. christ, i had friends that would ride between the rails smoking a cigarette while texting and holding an umbrella in other hand. the irish have mad biking skills. quit your f*cking douchebag-y whining.
Posted by dontbeabikedouche on April 12, 2012 at 10:16 AM
schmacky 18
What @7 said. Ann Romney's attempt to claim sisterhood with America's stay-at-home moms--few of whom have live-in chefs, full-time nannies, personal assistants, etc--is a typical 1% "we're just like you!" ploy and an insult to women who actually have to do all that work themselves.
Posted by schmacky on April 12, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Puty 19
I misread "Chihuly exhibit" as "Cthulhu exhibit". Couldn't figure out why Dom was whining about admission for a second there. I was ready to book my flight to Seattle!
Posted by Puty on April 12, 2012 at 10:24 AM
Gay Dude for Romney 20
@8: The context is malleable enough so that Ms. Rosen's follow up explanations are plausible - but that wasn't the blunder. That CNN clip shows her elitist tone that reminds us of how liberal women belittle stay-at-home moms.

Gay rights have been on an upward trajectory through several Democrat and Republican administrations. There is no doubt that will continue under a Romney administration. President Obama deserves great credit for repealing DADT, but he (like Romeny) will never sanction same sex marriage.

For someone who is a single-issue voter on marriage equality, then neither Romney or Obama should get your vote. For a minority within a minority of gay and lesbian Americans, we appreciate Mr. Obama, but find that another four years of his economic, foreign relations, and energy policies absolutely intolerable.
Posted by Gay Dude for Romney http://mittromney.com on April 12, 2012 at 10:27 AM
NaFun 21
@20 - "... we appreciate Mr. Obama, but find that another four years of common sense in economic, foreign, and energy policies absolutely intolerable." FTFY
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on April 12, 2012 at 10:47 AM
22
Parenting, single or otherwise, is not a job, it is a responsibility. If you become a parent you deserve no special treatment from society, but rather should be expected to live up to your responsibility. Whether that means securing day care, nannies, after school programs, or being a stay at home parent.

It isn't your job, it is your duty to your children and to society.
Posted by pragmatic on April 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM
23
The issue about patrol car cameras isn't as bad as it seems. If a criminal case is filed, defense lawyers can (and do) get the video via discovery rules, public disclosure act notwithstanding.
Posted by Algernon on April 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM
24
@22 I forgot the one exception, a woman becomes a parent due to rape.

Other than that, you chose outright or through carelessness(no birth control).
Posted by pragmatic on April 12, 2012 at 11:02 AM
Will in Seattle 25
Nobody wins in a War on Streetcars.

Especially the hopped up older drivers on meds in their cars.

Face it, only subsidized suburbanites "need" cars.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 12, 2012 at 11:05 AM
26
@14: Management can be a tough job. Good point but toughest doesn't pass the laugh test.
Posted by david on April 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM
27
Has Ann Romney ever had to balance staying home with a sick child against going to her job because she's worried that one more absence and she will be fired and then all of her kids will suffer?

No?

Then she's not the "expert" that Mitt Romney claims she is.
Nor does she have the experience that many women in the USofA have.
Posted by fairly.unbalanced on April 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM
28
Santorum campaign post-morten on nytimes.com has this unfortunate juxtaposition of words:
"Blow: What Rick Santorum Wrought"
Posted by ReallyBelievedMcKennaWasTrans on April 12, 2012 at 11:18 AM
JF 29
@26 Oh come on. My joke was funny.
Posted by JF on April 12, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Will in Seattle 30
@19 give it time.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 12, 2012 at 12:22 PM
More, I Say! 31
@20, you say it's "intolerable," but if Obama does manage to win this year's election, than tolerate his policies is, in fact, exactly what you will do.
Posted by More, I Say! on April 12, 2012 at 1:29 PM
Donolectic 32
@20 - So in summary, a person is worth less than a tax cut. Got it.

Also, recognition of our rights will improve in spite of Mitt Romney, not because of him. I majority of the entire republican machine that will start up if he takes office will be actively hostile to our rights. To think otherwise is as asinine as assuming that Obama will "never" be a supporter.

Posted by Donolectic on April 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM
venomlash 33
NoKo's rocket fell apart and crashed into the sea. LOL
Posted by venomlash on April 13, 2012 at 1:10 AM

Add a comment