Slog Comments
The Daily Show on Fox News' Sudden Love for Romney
1
Oh lordy, that endless cirle jerk, some whackjobs say something, the other zero-content types respond, and the whackjobs may respond back.
Point of order: FoxFiction has the "legal right" to fictionalize all their so-called news, having won several lawsuites, at the federal level, according them that right.
Therefore, what sane person with at least two neurons to rub together would even bother to listen to any of those f**kwads and douchetards??????
The corporate circle jerk, where zero content is purveyed, isn't the media --- there is NO effing media in Amerika.
Point of order: FoxFiction has the "legal right" to fictionalize all their so-called news, having won several lawsuites, at the federal level, according them that right.
Therefore, what sane person with at least two neurons to rub together would even bother to listen to any of those f**kwads and douchetards??????
The corporate circle jerk, where zero content is purveyed, isn't the media --- there is NO effing media in Amerika.
2
Sounds like that new Slog commenter, Gay Dude for Romney. Now he's crowing about his love for Romney, but where was he during the primaries? Suddenly Romney is GDfR's wet dream, most perfectest candidate ever!
4
@3, n*, M*tt, we m*** th**k *f the ch***ren.
I can say "the" here, right?
It's always good to be reminded of what a soulless bag of colostomy waste Dick Morris is.
I can say "the" here, right?
It's always good to be reminded of what a soulless bag of colostomy waste Dick Morris is.
7
@2: That's silly Rob. We're still in the GOP primaries actually. I wanted to make sure that Romney was the inevitable nominee before I used up a email address to register for Slog.
Now, go eat one of those famous Chesapeake Bay crabcakes.
Now, go eat one of those famous Chesapeake Bay crabcakes.
8
Gay Dude for Romney really needs his own column.
As in "NEW COLUMN! Ask a Gay Dude for Romney!!"
Just sayin'...
As in "NEW COLUMN! Ask a Gay Dude for Romney!!"
Just sayin'...
9
7, You were worried about using up an email address? You do know that email address are free, and are readily available, right?
You know as well as I that the rest of the republican primaries are just meaningless formalities.
So, it was only after you realized that Romney was the "inevitable" nominee, that you found your endless devotion to whom you suddenly realized is most dreamiest candidate ever? When the other republican nominees were using "class warfare" against your sweet love, why weren't you defending him then?
You know as well as I that the rest of the republican primaries are just meaningless formalities.
So, it was only after you realized that Romney was the "inevitable" nominee, that you found your endless devotion to whom you suddenly realized is most dreamiest candidate ever? When the other republican nominees were using "class warfare" against your sweet love, why weren't you defending him then?
10
@9, yes email addresses are free but I prefer to keep them to a minimum.
I don't want to clog up Slog with replies over tangential questions that are not about the topic of the post. Just like any other troll, I will pontificate my views as they relate to the posts -- otherwise, these sub threads tend to get tiring. Thanks.
Days to election: 200
I don't want to clog up Slog with replies over tangential questions that are not about the topic of the post. Just like any other troll, I will pontificate my views as they relate to the posts -- otherwise, these sub threads tend to get tiring. Thanks.
Days to election: 200
11
Pretty please, let the shit finally hit the fan: "Murdoch's News Corp facing growing legal threat in US"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/apr…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/apr…
12
Fox News has to love Romney now. They have to beat the communist, socialist, liberal, Muslim, gun-hating, anti-white, atheist Kenyan who currently holds the office of the Presidency. Dontcha know?
14
10, You're being intellectually dishonest, and evasive. I wonder why? You seem to avoid answering a lot of questions. When the tough questions are asked, you seem to disappear.
15
@14: Okay, I'll bite.
Just how is being for a candidate that you oppose being intellectually dishonest?
Just how is being for a candidate that you oppose being intellectually dishonest?
17
15, It's not that you are for a candidate that I oppose. (More of your intellectual dishonesty, trying to divert away from the questions asked.) It's about you not being to answer the questions of why you suddenly have found Romney to be your dream candidate. Why, when the other republican candidates were using class warfare against your beloved Romney were you not jumping to his defense then?
18
@17: I have been voting Republican for several presidential elections now, so it's nothing sudden. Romney is the only surviving moderate Republican candidate. Gingrich, Perry, Santorm, and the rest (except John Huntsman and Gary Johnson) were too right wing for me. Yes, even for me.
I never implied that Mitt Romney was a dream candidate. In fact, I don't think anyone in the GOP (save his family and close friends) think of him as the dream candidate. As I said in one of my first posts, we make sacrifices on some key issues as voters to choose a candidate who best fits our overall thinking on what is best for America at this time in our history.
Regarding your last question, how can you expect me to have commented on past politics when I just joined Slog? As I recall, at the time I had no opinion about it as it knew it would be ultimatly of no consequence.
I never implied that Mitt Romney was a dream candidate. In fact, I don't think anyone in the GOP (save his family and close friends) think of him as the dream candidate. As I said in one of my first posts, we make sacrifices on some key issues as voters to choose a candidate who best fits our overall thinking on what is best for America at this time in our history.
Regarding your last question, how can you expect me to have commented on past politics when I just joined Slog? As I recall, at the time I had no opinion about it as it knew it would be ultimatly of no consequence.
20
"Romney is the only surviving moderate Republican candidate"
BS. He has the rhetoric of an extremist for the 1%.
BS. He has the rhetoric of an extremist for the 1%.
21
18, so you'd vote for whatever Republican was nominated no matter what, and Romney basically represents the not Obama vote for you. Well, you are unprincipled, is nothing else.
22
@21: How can you call me unprincipled when you're basing principles on your own subjective political dispositions? What ever happened to the marketplace of ideas Rob? Or is that concept too unprincipled for you?
Comments (22) RSS