Slog Comments

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Geocrackr 1
Makes one wonder who she pissed off and how.
Posted by Geocrackr on April 30, 2012 at 2:43 PM
2
@1 Well, she pisses me off regularly, but I have no pull with the TIMES. Glad to see they do have some good judgment.
Posted by Linda J on April 30, 2012 at 2:51 PM
balderdash 3
Hahahaha, "one of the most fascinating and important election seasons in many years." What a bunch of horseshit. This election's a done deal unless there's some kind of major fraud, and Romney is the least interesting nominee for either party since Dukakis.

She's being sent over to write awful horse-race "journalism" and do each of the horrid little things detailed in this feature today.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on April 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Will in Seattle 4
@1 they were getting a lot of pushback from sales that locals hate her right wing screeds
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 30, 2012 at 3:07 PM
5

Naturally, Goldy, you managed to get in a reference to yourself before the subject of story.
Posted by Edmund Burke on April 30, 2012 at 3:10 PM
Keister Button 6
Surprised it wasn't Lynne Varner.
Posted by Keister Button on April 30, 2012 at 3:12 PM
7
Since she was hired (IIRC) on the strength of her human-interest stories for a North Carolina newspaper, you might wonder what she was doing on the editorial page in the first place. The only thing I can figure is that she wasn't sufficiently insistent or vociferous about the only issue the Times cares about: making sure poor people and students suck it up so that the Blethens don't have to pay any more in taxes.
Posted by maddogm13 on April 30, 2012 at 3:17 PM
Vince 8
The Times is showing some desperation. There seems to be an increasing awareness things are not what they used to be. Surprise! They aren't the rulers they thought they were. Get ready. I have the feeling they are feeling the heat. And something bigger is on the way.
Posted by Vince on April 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM
9
I'm sure we can all look forward to Balter's bias influencing coverage of the governor's race. Great.
Posted by giantladysquirrels on April 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM
Will in Seattle 10
@8 maybe they should clue in that Seattle is liberal.

And damned proud of it, too!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on April 30, 2012 at 3:28 PM
MarkyMark 11
Why ANYONE would EVER waste minutes of their lives reading Times editorials is one of the great mysteries of the universe...
Posted by MarkyMark on April 30, 2012 at 3:33 PM
ScrawnyKayaker 12
Gee, the next time Eli delivers a verbal beating to her on Friday mornings, I'll almost feel sorry for Joni. Or not, since they usually follow some egregious neo-liberal horseshit blather.
Posted by ScrawnyKayaker on April 30, 2012 at 3:46 PM
13
She probably won't be on KUOW on Friday anymore. Hopefully Danny W will take her place.
Posted by sarah70 on April 30, 2012 at 3:55 PM
14
#3 Are you really under the impression that there is only one election in the election season?
Posted by avocado on April 30, 2012 at 4:00 PM
15
Yeah, Lynne Varner was very classy today in keeping with the Times not getting the Seattle Schools superintendent finalist that they wanted. She's already dissing the guy via Tweets and he isn't even here yet.
Posted by westello on April 30, 2012 at 4:23 PM
16
"... she was a star reporter in the '80s and '90s." Really? I moved to Seattle in 1991, and it seems to me I remember Joni being debuted at the Times right about then — as (get this) "Hard-Hitting Joni Balter." And that's how we've referred to her around our household ever since.

Oh well, at least we won't have to listen to her prattle on KUOW for the next few months.
Posted by cheakamus on April 30, 2012 at 4:37 PM
17
I was surprised when I read this rather good ST editorial today, and then I realized that it wasn't written by JB.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ed…
Posted by elaineinballard on April 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM
DOUG. 18
...no doubt to be replaced by some 23-year-old Spawn Of Blethen.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on April 30, 2012 at 4:52 PM
19
I would take Joni Balter's sarcastic 'smart girl' quotes on KUOW if we could just horsetrade Lynne Varner to the newsroom. Pretttttyyyyy Pleaaaaaaassssssseeeeee.
Posted by gator bait on April 30, 2012 at 6:49 PM
20
It wasn't Lynn Varner because every argument Varner makes is a pubbie strawman argument and she doesn't even know she doing it. So she's perfect for the Times. Balter, OTOH, sometimes knows when she's making strawman arguments and tries to compensate for not being quite as stupid as Varner with ad hominem attacks on liberals. Unfortunately for Balter, the Blethens are connoisseurs of stupidity and are not fooled.
Posted by We look forward to her objective reporting on April 30, 2012 at 7:32 PM
21
I wonder if we are celebrating prematurely. Maybe she's just been moved to be the Blethen thug overlooking political coverage so they can get their man McKenna in.

Posted by moretent on April 30, 2012 at 9:15 PM
the idiot formerly known as kk 22
Good riddance. I don't have an ideological beef about Balter, just that she is the most boring, predictable columnist EVER. Has she ever written ANYthing that isn't the definition of conventional wisdom? She makes David Broder look like Hunter S. Thompson.
Posted by the idiot formerly known as kk on April 30, 2012 at 9:19 PM
23
She can barely write at the third grade level. Sheesh!
Posted by jim.demetre@gmail.com on April 30, 2012 at 9:42 PM
24
Now if only they get rid of Geoff Baker, I might start getting the times again.
Posted by CbytheSea on May 1, 2012 at 7:19 AM
25
@22 Well struck. I will be filing that simile away for future reuse and recycling.
Posted by capicola on May 25, 2012 at 1:36 PM

Add a comment