Slog Comments
The Return of the Debtors' Prison
1
Some of the comments over at the link made me puke. Some freaks are actually OK with this happening.....
2
It's pretty disgusting, though I will note that usually with these sorts of cases people get thrown in jail for ignoring court dates, not the actual non payment.
The 2005 bankruptcy law change--the one that puts credit card companies above actual people--enabled a lot of this.
The 2005 bankruptcy law change--the one that puts credit card companies above actual people--enabled a lot of this.
3
@2 well, Corporations are People, and People are Serfs, after all.
Next up: Corporations get 1 vote for 1 dollar and people get 3/5ths of a vote per person.
Next up: Corporations get 1 vote for 1 dollar and people get 3/5ths of a vote per person.
5
Also see:
"In Prosecutors, Debt Collectors Find a Partner"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/busine…
"Poor Land in Jail as Companies Add Huge Fees for Probation"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/us/pro…
"In Prosecutors, Debt Collectors Find a Partner"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/busine…
"Poor Land in Jail as Companies Add Huge Fees for Probation"
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/03/us/pro…
6
Could this happen in Washington?
Perhaps now would be a good time to let people know about Rolling Jubilee, Brendan.
So far they've raised enough money to abolish nearly $10,000,000 of debt -- beginning with medical debt.
The Stranger has been inexplicably silent about Rolling Jubilee, despite Dan Savage tweeting: "I love -- LOVE -- this cause".
What gives?
Perhaps now would be a good time to let people know about Rolling Jubilee, Brendan.
So far they've raised enough money to abolish nearly $10,000,000 of debt -- beginning with medical debt.
The Stranger has been inexplicably silent about Rolling Jubilee, despite Dan Savage tweeting: "I love -- LOVE -- this cause".
What gives?
7
I thought the occupy people were a little out there, now that were apparently sending people to county prison over a less than 300 bill I feel like their work is a national need in the war against people. If thats what personal responsibility means you can consider me the devil for all I care, you have to have no inner or outer soul to think any part of this behavior is human.
8
Just to be a contrarian, there is a real problem with collecting on debts once you have a judgment.
I've got a friend who's a contractor, who did some work for a guy who decided not to pay for it. No dispute over the quality of the work or anything, he just decided to ignore the debt.
So my friend took him to small claims court. I actually served the guy twice as a favor to my friend (service needs to be done by a disinterested party), but he refused to show up in court. So my friend got a default judgment for the debt plus costs.
But he just ignored that, too. And my friend never would have collected, except that the magistrate had issued a bench warrant (judges really hate being ignored). And a couple months later, when he was pulled over for speeding, the cop arrested him on the warrant. He was tossed in jail with bail set at the amount of the judgment.
His mother posted bail, and then he finally turned up in court to retrieve the bond. He actually denied being served, I testified in detail about the times I'd served him and the magistrate handed the bond money over to my friend. Case (finally) closed.
So what else would have worked here to get this guy to satisfy this debt? Technically, he was tossed in jail for contempt, but the reality is this was a debtor's prison. And it worked!
Yes, debt collectors and corporations do abuse the legal process, by filing hundreds or thousands of cases at a time, pulling shady tactics on service (like lying about doing it), etc., etc. And that should be stopped. But that doesn't make it an illegitimate tool.
I've got a friend who's a contractor, who did some work for a guy who decided not to pay for it. No dispute over the quality of the work or anything, he just decided to ignore the debt.
So my friend took him to small claims court. I actually served the guy twice as a favor to my friend (service needs to be done by a disinterested party), but he refused to show up in court. So my friend got a default judgment for the debt plus costs.
But he just ignored that, too. And my friend never would have collected, except that the magistrate had issued a bench warrant (judges really hate being ignored). And a couple months later, when he was pulled over for speeding, the cop arrested him on the warrant. He was tossed in jail with bail set at the amount of the judgment.
His mother posted bail, and then he finally turned up in court to retrieve the bond. He actually denied being served, I testified in detail about the times I'd served him and the magistrate handed the bond money over to my friend. Case (finally) closed.
So what else would have worked here to get this guy to satisfy this debt? Technically, he was tossed in jail for contempt, but the reality is this was a debtor's prison. And it worked!
Yes, debt collectors and corporations do abuse the legal process, by filing hundreds or thousands of cases at a time, pulling shady tactics on service (like lying about doing it), etc., etc. And that should be stopped. But that doesn't make it an illegitimate tool.
9
Try dealing with the IRS.
They are the ultimate debt collectors.
The ultimate pressure men.
The ultimate vig.
10
And do the lenders face any criticism or penalties for lending to people who are bad risks?
Why is all the blame always on the borrower? Lending money is not a risk-free premise and the banks fucking know it! If someone's a bad risk and the bank gives them a loan anyway, who's the fool? Fuck the banks and moneylenders. They need to learn a lesson: you don't win every game, and if you bet on every long shot, you have only yourself to blame when you lose everything.
This woman's medical bill thing is a whole different stupid mess (i.e., that medical care should be free of charge to everyone), but that horse has already been beaten long past death.
Why is all the blame always on the borrower? Lending money is not a risk-free premise and the banks fucking know it! If someone's a bad risk and the bank gives them a loan anyway, who's the fool? Fuck the banks and moneylenders. They need to learn a lesson: you don't win every game, and if you bet on every long shot, you have only yourself to blame when you lose everything.
This woman's medical bill thing is a whole different stupid mess (i.e., that medical care should be free of charge to everyone), but that horse has already been beaten long past death.
11
@8 The problem is that due to the fact that we have (in effect) a pay to play legal system, the ability to enforce debts is increasingly not available to many Americans. Only those with deep pockets can be certain that they will collect. http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/artic…
12
I wonder how much arresting and jailing someone costs? This is public expenditure to recover private debt. Why should tax money be spent recouping money for private companies?
13
Read the article. This is outrageous. It's not justice or fairness. It's extortion. It's indefensible that in a society that's increasingly geared to indentured servanthood, people have their personal freedom confiscated for being victims of the wheels designed to crush them. And then society bears the burden of dealing with the wreckage.
But it's okay, because it's the richest that make rules. As long as the system works for them, everything's okay.
Also, notice how the article mentions that local governments, starved for revenue, are relying on this legal intimidation to squeeze as many pennies as possible from folks who have nothing left. The glories of small government in action. ("You can throw me in prison. Just don't raise my taxes.")
But it's okay, because it's the richest that make rules. As long as the system works for them, everything's okay.
Also, notice how the article mentions that local governments, starved for revenue, are relying on this legal intimidation to squeeze as many pennies as possible from folks who have nothing left. The glories of small government in action. ("You can throw me in prison. Just don't raise my taxes.")
15
one of the reasons my wife and i left the u.s. - had we stayed she would still be hounded, despite her lawyers monthly efforts, by a $2,300 hospital bill that does not actually exist. and she's not a u.s. citizen, so you can imagine where she would end up - jail/ics/deported. . .
fuck that.
fuck that.
16
So now that she's in jail, will Ms. Lindsay magically be able to come up with the $280?
Feels like this country is moving backwards -- this seems like something you'd read about in a Dickens' novel.
Feels like this country is moving backwards -- this seems like something you'd read about in a Dickens' novel.
17
@6..It's not Dan's call...talk to Tim the publisher. He isn't as..liberal as you may wish him to be.
18
"Just as in Rome, today’s debt overhead cannot be paid. The question is, just how will it not be paid? Will society realize the need for debt write-downs, or will it permit massive foreclosure to tear society apart and reduce debtors to neo-serfdom?"
http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/20…
http://www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/20…
19
This will not stand.
In The Qunited States Of Gaymerica NO ONE will have to pay their debts.
(unless they are small business owners who employ people....aka Public Enema #1)
In The Qunited States Of Gaymerica NO ONE will have to pay their debts.
(unless they are small business owners who employ people....aka Public Enema #1)
21
No one should have to go to jail for not paying a medical bill. Other forms of debts are up for debate, but not ever medical care.
22
Y'all should read "Debt: The first 5,000 years". It is a real eye-opener regarding the origins of debt, and how it has shifted and changed over the years. Actual anthropological evidence, as opposed to an economist's mythology.
It would serve the current debate very well.
It would serve the current debate very well.
23
StrikeDebt (@StrikeDebt)
The logic of debt as explained by Reddit http://pic.twitter.com/nPBb9CKs
(December 11, 2012)
24
@17: I've been wondering who calls the shots at The Stranger.
My impression is that there are several rather non-progressive actors at the helm, but who ultimately makes the editorial calls? Is it Tim Keck? Eli Sanders? Dan Savage?
Some of the choices they make are pretty bizarre. Dan Savage just made a post calling for a general strike, but he won't cover Rolling Jubilee? Strike Debt and Rolling Jubilee have been covered by everyone from the NY Times to Forbes. It's confusing that The Stranger won't touch it.
My impression is that there are several rather non-progressive actors at the helm, but who ultimately makes the editorial calls? Is it Tim Keck? Eli Sanders? Dan Savage?
Some of the choices they make are pretty bizarre. Dan Savage just made a post calling for a general strike, but he won't cover Rolling Jubilee? Strike Debt and Rolling Jubilee have been covered by everyone from the NY Times to Forbes. It's confusing that The Stranger won't touch it.
25
#6, Rolling Jubilee is a scam. I contacted them about my debts and their answer was that they couldn't purchase individual debts, just aggregate bundles.
What very few people are talking about is that if your debt is bought down, or if you negotiate to pay a part of your debt with creditors, the balance of your unpaid debt is reported to the IRS who consider it income. You then have to pay tax on that amount or get in trouble with the IRS. I have a freind who's in trouble with the IRS; believe me, you don't want them on your ass.
Since Rolling Jubilee is buying anonomous bundles of debt, those folks whose debt is bought don't have a choice in it, and will have massive tax bills to pay. Actually declaring bankruptcy would protect them from this. So Rolling Jubilee is actually putting people in danger of more, un-dischargable debt.
What very few people are talking about is that if your debt is bought down, or if you negotiate to pay a part of your debt with creditors, the balance of your unpaid debt is reported to the IRS who consider it income. You then have to pay tax on that amount or get in trouble with the IRS. I have a freind who's in trouble with the IRS; believe me, you don't want them on your ass.
Since Rolling Jubilee is buying anonomous bundles of debt, those folks whose debt is bought don't have a choice in it, and will have massive tax bills to pay. Actually declaring bankruptcy would protect them from this. So Rolling Jubilee is actually putting people in danger of more, un-dischargable debt.
Comments (25) RSS