Slog Comments

 

Comments (20) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Matt the Engineer 1
8 hours at an average of 186mph. That’s about the distance of Seattle -> SF -> LA -> San Diego, then turning left and heading to Phoenix. In 8 hours. On a train. Oh, and that average speed includes stopping at 35 cities.

Jealous.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on December 28, 2012 at 10:24 AM
gloomy gus 2
"Tear through the countryside" is right - the government didn't have to observe no stinking rights or regulations tossing the track down. Helluva train line though. It will have the effect of further isolating the towns along the route where the trains used to stop, hastening the townspeople's flight to the cities. That will ultimately dampen China's population growth and natural resource drain, which for all of us is a very good thing indeed.

In other China news, the government is now requiring its citizens to register for the internet using their full legal names, even just to leave pointless blog comments.

(Signed, Gloomy "this is the only real name of mine you need to know" Gus)
Posted by gloomy gus on December 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM
treefort 3
asian parents. damn.
Posted by treefort on December 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM
fletc3her 4
If only we had some pride. While the Chinese are building infrastructure we are unable even to deal with mudslides on a century old freight track. Their national conversation is about how to connect far flung centers of industry while ours is about whether the U.N. is going to take away hillbilly's guns.
Posted by fletc3her on December 28, 2012 at 10:49 AM
5
If the US enacted something similar (re filial duties) that would be like a massive jobs program for lawyers. Stimulus!
Posted by Vadt on December 28, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 6
Wow...12 hours!!

Meanwhile in January, I'm taking a Boeing 737 from Seattle to Puerto Villarta. Four hours.

But that's progress for ya!!
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on December 28, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Matt the Engineer 7
@6 It's 8 hrs, not 12. And your 4 hour trip has to add hours at the airport, getting to the airport, then getting to your destination.

This line is a bit past the edge of how far you can go in a bullet train and save time. But the capacity's huge compared to an airplane, and China has a whole lot of travellers.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on December 28, 2012 at 11:29 AM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 8
#7

I live in Kent. It takes me 10 minutes to drive to Doug Fox Parking. It would take me 30 minutes to get to King Street station and hundreds in parking.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://www.you-read-it-here-first.com on December 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM
Matt the Engineer 9
@8 If we wanted to further the car-dependent lifestyle you enjoy it would be trivial to add a train station in the middle of nowhere surrounded by parking as well.
Posted by Matt the Engineer on December 28, 2012 at 11:37 AM
10
Takes less 2 1/2 hrs by plane.... and is a hell of a lot safer.
Posted by Plane Spotter on December 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM
Mattini 11
Another way of looking at it: it's 1,400 miles from San Diego to Vancouver, BC. I believe you can make the trip on Amtrak, but it will take you more than 'the best part of 24 hours.' Like @1, I'm jealous.
Posted by Mattini on December 28, 2012 at 11:54 AM
12
"Their national conversation"

That's so cute. I've never heard a dictatorship described as a 'conversation'. You don't travel much do you?
Posted by Chinaman on December 28, 2012 at 12:03 PM
Pope Peabrain 13
The law forcing Chinese people to visit the parents was necessary because an hour after they see you they are hungry for more.
Posted by Pope Peabrain on December 28, 2012 at 12:05 PM
14
@11 why would u spend 8 hrs in a train when you could fly there in 2 1/2 hrs? Or should we just build these things because it's fun, screw our national finances?
Posted by I'd rather be productive than entertained on December 28, 2012 at 1:12 PM
laterite 15
Built with zero regard to safety, environment, or well-being of the communities through which it traverses. Plus, if you die in a derailing, the government will attempt to cover up your fate! Sounds magical.
Posted by laterite on December 28, 2012 at 2:03 PM
Renton Mike 16
@9 & @8 There's an Amtrak station in Tukwila, which borders Kent.
Posted by Renton Mike on December 28, 2012 at 2:31 PM
sperifera 17
Considering China's traditional laissez-faire/graft-oriented regulation system, I wonder if we'll see a premature aging curve on their rail infrastructure like we have on some of their buildings (read: schools). Still, a 1400 mile long HSR line is impressive.
Posted by sperifera on December 28, 2012 at 3:35 PM
18
@2 It's not like local and non-HSR express trains are going to stop running. HSR lines in China are mostly prestige projects and mostly used by the upper-middle class (Chinese 1%). Almost everyone else will keep using the cheaper and more numerous local / express lines.
Posted by BL on December 28, 2012 at 4:25 PM
Free Lunch 19
@14 - Would you fly rather than take such a train to get from Seattle to Portland? You'd spend more time boarding, waiting for your turn to depart the tarmac, and deplaning than the 55 minutes this train would take. And then there's the TSA, traveling from the remote airport to downtown, etc.

The point isn't traveling the whole extent (which agreed would be a stupid choice over a plane), but rather to connect cities along the chain. For commuters, it allows greater flexibility on where they work vs. where they live.

With such a train, you could live in Tacoma and work in downtown Seattle, and you'd have a shorter commute (11 minutes!) than someone driving from Ballard.
Posted by Free Lunch on December 28, 2012 at 7:24 PM
20
@19 if you take a train to Portland you can bring back lots of tasty beer. Can't do that as easily on a plane.
Posted by CbytheSea on December 28, 2012 at 7:30 PM

Add a comment