Slog Comments

 

Comments (15) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I think the statement would work better as "a subset of white males against everyone else", so that's it's clear there are plenty of white males on both sides. I still don't agree, insofar as a sizable proportion of Republican voters are female, even if the leadership is male, though the past against the future is apt.
Posted by Lynx on January 4, 2013 at 8:47 AM · Report this
2
Way to marginalize everybody white and male, most of whom AREN'T sociopathic dickbags. If only there was some historical precedent that could inform us all about the dangers of stereotyping people based on gender and skin color...
Posted by All Women And Blacks Are Good on January 4, 2013 at 9:06 AM · Report this
Asparagus! 3
As a white male, I can assure you that most white males are, indeed, sociopathic dickbags.
Posted by Asparagus! on January 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM · Report this
4
@1: Agreed. The GOP as it is today is a party of a particular group of white males - and white females - that share little with people like me apart from skin color and, possibly, some life experiences associated with that skin color. In fact, at least here in the Northeast, I'd say I know slightly more conservative women than men, although the count of either is pretty negligible.
Posted by NateMan on January 4, 2013 at 9:08 AM · Report this
Charles Mudede 5
@1, that's what i meant by the rest: "(the rest includes white males)"
Posted by Charles Mudede on January 4, 2013 at 9:13 AM · Report this
6 Comment Pulled
7
to say it's white males versus everyone else but the rest includes white males is like hearing sarah palin translated to have a leftist point of view.

it's illogical gibberish.

Posted by a resty white male on January 4, 2013 at 9:51 AM · Report this
Charles Mudede 8
@6, what does he have to do with this post? it's like asking me for an opinion of adam lanza. so out of the blue.
Posted by Charles Mudede on January 4, 2013 at 9:52 AM · Report this
TVDinner 9
While we all know what the troll's ugly agenda is, and it is not one worth paying attention to, it does seem just a tad hypocritical for you, Charles, to call somebody else out for a non-sequitur, Mister King of the Non-sequiturs.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on January 4, 2013 at 10:13 AM · Report this
10 Comment Pulled
11
As long as there are more Elizabeth Warrens, and fewer Maria Cantwells and Diane Feinsteins, I'll be satisfied....
Posted by sgt_doom on January 4, 2013 at 10:27 AM · Report this
12 Comment Pulled
13
"it's like asking me for an opinion of adam lanza"

Except the Adam Lanza's in America are outliers, less than 0.1% of all gun deaths in the US, whereas the Ja'Mari's are 50% of all gun deaths.
Posted by Ja'know what I'm talkin' 'bout? on January 4, 2013 at 11:04 AM · Report this
14
Must be tough being a liberal, everywhere you go, constantly checking out everyones race, assessing their gender and being sure everyone is happy with their testicles/vaginas.

It's like having a stick permanently rooted up your ass.
Posted by Do'nald D'uck on January 4, 2013 at 11:10 AM · Report this
venomlash 15
@9: I went "huehuehuehuehuehue" in my chair.
Posted by venomlash on January 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM · Report this

Add a comment