Slog Comments

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cato the Younger Younger 1
Maybe they will become an inevitability? I think you can drop the maybe..I don't even think you're that naive about how this country operates.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on February 12, 2013 at 12:37 PM · Report this
2
I find it extremely odd that their claiming that the FAA has no requests for drones to be used in this search.

Given the proximity to the southern border, it's not like one, already calibrated for brown people even, isn't in the vicinity.

So, is the FAA's jurisdiction merely being ignored or perhaps are they simply hoping to gin up a public outcry in favor drone surveillance?
Posted by The sun in your Eyes; Made some of the lies worth believing on February 12, 2013 at 12:43 PM · Report this
4
"The FAA says that's not true."

Oh, well that settles that then.
Posted by LORD ZOD on February 12, 2013 at 1:00 PM · Report this
5
Nice obfuscated double speak... no denial that perhaps LAPD or ÇSP might be flying drones, only denial of fed activity, it seems...How do you evade a drone you can't hear which has IR, radar and high Res cameras looking for you. Just curious as to the tech and process.
Posted by pupuguru http://www.godsweed.org on February 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM · Report this
You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me 6
Will you be correcting all of Chucks faulty “reporting” now?
You’re going to be very, very busy indeed…
Posted by You_Gotta_Be_Kidding_Me on February 12, 2013 at 1:31 PM · Report this
watchout5 7
1. Infrared.
2. False alarm, better to question the wrong answer on this topic imo.
Posted by watchout5 http://www.overclockeddrama.com on February 12, 2013 at 1:35 PM · Report this
8
Would you all have a problem using camera drones to help catch the South Park rapist?

...that's what I thought.
Posted by You'd scream for help then assholes on February 12, 2013 at 4:04 PM · Report this

Add a comment