Slog Comments

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
cienna, ill post some classic joseph coors for you and tim later. ive got my hands full right now. you'll know where ill be ok.
Posted by tim koch on February 27, 2013 at 1:23 PM · Report this
sasha 2
But does the software include a Minority report?
Posted by sasha on February 27, 2013 at 1:33 PM · Report this
RebR 3
PK Dick is rolling over in his grave.
Posted by RebR on February 27, 2013 at 1:39 PM · Report this
Rotten666 4
Hey, for a fraction of that money I can do the same exact job. Lets see...crackheads loitering at the west side of the Rainier Ave crosswalk, open air drug market across the street for said crackheads, open air drug market on 37th ave s, squatters at "the Porch", gangbangers at the Rainier Beach Jack in the Box.

The same people, doing the same shit, at the same place, every fucking day for years. But the cops need a computer program to tell them that?
Posted by Rotten666 on February 27, 2013 at 1:49 PM · Report this
5
@4 Simpler than that: jack in the box plus or minus two blocks.
Posted by wxPDX on February 27, 2013 at 2:03 PM · Report this
6
@4 and 5- dead on.
Posted by Chris Jury http://www.thebismarck.net on February 27, 2013 at 2:16 PM · Report this
treacle 7
But, with police patrolling predicted hot spots, actual crime will move elsewhere -- an adaptive response. How long will the predictive software take to recalibrate the new hot spots? Or will it simply drive crime to different areas where the cops aren't during their 30% time?
Posted by treacle on February 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM · Report this
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 8

What happens when the crooks get an Android app that can tell them where all the cop cars are...

Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://_ on February 27, 2013 at 2:38 PM · Report this
10
Is this the same crappy type of algorithm that Pandora and Netflix use to (wrongly) predict what I will like?
Posted by skeptic420 on February 27, 2013 at 2:58 PM · Report this
Fnarf 12
In order to work properly, the software requires elderly Indian woodcarvers and Mexican immigrants with full bladders to wear four-foot diameter crosshair hats on their heads for the satellites to track.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 27, 2013 at 3:41 PM · Report this
13
Why have we resorted to gadgets to do our policing? Oh, yeah, because our police officers don't know their communities well enough to do this on their own. Good spend of money, I much rather have software than more actual officers and better training.
Posted by SeattleD on February 27, 2013 at 3:54 PM · Report this
14
The word you want is precrime, not thoughtcrime.
Posted by TechBear on February 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM · Report this
GeneStoner 15
Unfortunately, technology is driving policing nowadays.

Just look at how impossible it has become to convict someone without dash cam video of the person commiting a crime.

y'all don't trust your popo enough no mo...
Posted by GeneStoner on February 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM · Report this
16
@7

That was an early criticism of hot-spot policing, but in places where there's enough data to analyze, it seems it doesn't work that way: when crime has gone down in hot spots, it generally hasn't popped up elsewhere (NYC is the pioneer in this sort of stuff, software-based and otherwise).

Why it doesn't work the way one might think it would is still a complete mystery, but there are theories; some think criminals, like most people, don't stray much from a set routine in a small physical area from day to day; others think that some high-crime areas develop a sort of geographically-defined permissive social space. But without data, these are just-so stories; no-one knows yet why the thing works the way it seems to.
Posted by robotslave on February 27, 2013 at 8:03 PM · Report this

Add a comment

Commenting on this item is available only to registered commenters.