Slog Comments

 

Comments (10) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Curmudgeon 1
It's time to amend the state constitution.

"The right to possess, cultivate, or sell cannabis to other adults, shall not be violated."
Posted by Curmudgeon on August 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM
The Amazing Jim 2
De-criminalization is not making it legal. We should skip this penny-ante bullshit with a $100 fine and just legalize and tax it.
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on August 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM
COMTE 3
Absolutely, decriminalization is just a half-step - albeit one in the right direction - because it only addresses the issue on the demand-side. Without full legalization to possess AND to cultivate the problem still exists in that, while possession may be reduced to the level of a parking ticket, cultivation is still going to be fully criminalized and local LEA's in concert with the DEA are going to continue to spend an inordinately large amount of public resources going after growers.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on August 21, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Max Solomon 4
chopp is a gift that keeps on giving.
Posted by Max Solomon on August 21, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Will in Seattle 5
@2 for the win.

Decriminalize it and specifically state that no city resources of any kind may be used to prosecute the mere possession for anything other than a civil traffic infraction or equivalent penalty. That includes jails, courts, police - except for fire.

Cut them off at the knees and force the feds to do their own dirty work.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM
6
They should do a back door legalization for the revenue. How about this:

The fine is $1000 and N hours of community service. But you can pre-pay $100 per year to reduce the fine to $5 and no community service.
Posted by chrisgreen on August 21, 2009 at 1:09 PM
Will in Seattle 7
interesting idea, @6. Kids could do the community service hours for their high school grad requirement once they turned 18 too.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on August 21, 2009 at 2:16 PM
8
Though I'm in the minority I still have a problem with this. Simply making the penalties for small possesion lower is only making the problem worse. The is the whole all or none argument and if you decriminalize it you had better do it all the way or you end up like Vancouver with over 100 drug related murders each year (along with tons of people disappearing). If you think these local turf and gang murders don't revolve around pot you're fooling yourself. Make it virtually legal to posses it but illegal to make and sell it is setting the city up for even worse problems though you will ignorantly point at "crack" as the problem.
Posted by you really dont get it on August 21, 2009 at 3:35 PM
9
Ok, fine. How do we run an initiative? And what does that mean specifically--a ballot initiative? Seriously, what's the first step here?
Posted by Cronkodonk on August 22, 2009 at 5:16 PM
Ride That Bullet Train To Vegas 10
Here in Massachusetts we had a referendum on doing the same thing with pot ($100 ticket for less than an ounce) and it passed. From what I hear the cops don't even issue the tickets as they've said it's not worth it. And as you'll notice, reducing the penalty on pot possession (along with allowing gay marriage) has caused MA to fall into the ocean and spontaneously combust at the same time. It's a real shame...things went downhill here so fast.
Posted by Ride That Bullet Train To Vegas http://welcometoflavorcountry.wordpress.com on August 22, 2009 at 5:28 PM

Add a comment