Aaron: This is good political reporting with bad politics. You've written a very long story about homeless people that doesn't focus on their needs. You've written a story about Nickelsville- created and so-named to protest the Nickels administrations' aggressive homeless sweeps-- without even mentioning the sweeps. The question of how the Nickels administration plans to respond to Nickelsville is important. But it's not the only, and I would argue not even the most important, issue at play here.
Why'd you bury the City's refusal to respond at all (much less honestly) to your requests for comment and information? Suggests why this report seems a bit thin and smeary.
Posted by
tomasyalba on October 31, 2008 at 1:54 PM
@1- the Church is exempt under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2001 (RLUIPA)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_Land_Use_and_Instititionalized_Persons_Act
The law's been challenged (and upheld) to the Supremes but only as it relates to the prisoner portion of RLUIPA. There hasn't been a ruling to zoning cases...so I guess this is what hizhonor is hanging his hat on. That'll be a blast -- The City of Seattle VS University Christian Church and Nickelsville.
Comments (5) RSS