News

In the Hall

Walking the Walk

Mayor Greg Nickels boasted in his budget address on Monday that the city had "added more sidewalks than any recent administration" under his leadership.

But Council Member Nick Licata, who is up for reelection in 2009, says the city has redirected millions of dollars that should have been spent on improvements for pedestrians and cyclists in places like Southeast Seattle to vanity projects serving Vulcan's office complex in South Lake Union—projects that include more than 30 blocks of new sidewalks, or nearly twice as many blocks as were built in the entire city in 2008.

In contrast, Licata noted at a meeting of the Othello Neighborhood Association in Southeast Seattle last Tuesday, the mayor's much-touted Bridging the Gap transportation levy, passed by Seattle voters in 2006, has built just one block of sidewalk in Southeast Seattle, just south of I-90.recommended

"It's right here," Licata told the sympathetic crowd, gesturing to a map of the city. "I've circled it."

Licata is a longtime opponent of Nickels's $200 million Mercer Street proposal, which would widen the street through South Lake Union and turn it into a two-way boulevard. Recently, several neighborhood groups that used to support "fixing the Mercer mess" have also turned against the mayor's proposal; on October 1, a group of Mercer corridor stakeholders planned to hold an early-morning meeting with city officials and Vulcan representatives—an effort, sources said, to bring prodigal supporters back into the fold.

Although Licata traveled to Othello to excoriate the mayor's $200 million proposal to widen Mercer Street—a project that would, Licata contends, take a disproportionate share of Bridging the Gap money—it's not the only neighborhood getting short shrift. When the mayor sets his priorities, wealthy donors get first crack, followed by everybody else. In contrast, Licata says, he would take a big chunk of the money the mayor is spending in South Lake Union—$20 million of $43 million being raised by a new tax on commercial parking—and "spend it on sidewalks throughout the city."

And speaking of sidewalks: Although Nickels's budget does include $3.5 million, over two years, to build new ones, it also cuts two major pedestrian-safety projects near and dear to the hearts of pedestrian and sidewalk advocates. First, Nickels's proposal slashes funding for pedestrian and cyclist safety on Aurora Avenue north of 110th Street. Second, it eliminates most funding for improvements to Linden Avenue North, where residents have complained for years about nonexistent sidewalks, inadequate bike markings, and a road so marked with potholes it can only be traversed at a few miles an hour.

"Where are the city's priorities?" Licata says.

That's an easy one: They're in Paul Allen's back pocket, along with our mayor. recommended

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (6) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
We need priorities that allocate money for pedestrian safety and easy Rapid Bus Transit to the OLD City. We in The Lesser Outer Seattle Territories (LOST)Northwest and (LOST) North, annexed in 1954 are stll without modern non-vehicular transportation amenities. There is not one Complete Street above NW N NE 105th Street. This area serves as home for 30,000 residents from the Sound to Interstate-5.
Meanwhile Jan Drago, Chair for the Seattle Council Transportation Committee, is talking about streetcars for areas in Old Seattle (below 85th Street), that are already served by Metro and have complete streets: gutters, drains, curbs, planting strips,sidewalks and good overhead lighting.
The complete street protects the pedestrian and the wheelchair bound.
What is going on? Where has equity fled? Where is fairness and equal justice?
We have needed help for a long time. Fifty four years.
Regards, Richard L. Dyksterhuis
Member of the BIG Coalition to Improve Northwest Seattle
Posted by Richard L.Dyksterhuis on October 2, 2008 at 12:28 AM · Report
2
Does Mercer Street need to get "fixed" with that nice broad landscaped boulevard in the middle of the street? Part of the problem with the pricetag of this project, is that the City has to purchase land for purposes of creating the wide easement to accommodate all the lanes and median.

The City, which once owned this land, now has to buy it back for almost twice the price. How ridiculous is this.

While a landscaped median is nice, the City should be exploring other options that don't require it to buy land for a wide easement. This landscape median is there for one purpose: to add value to Vulcan's portfolio.

Vulcan Inc. began designing this boulevard for the City back in 2002, and Mayor Nickles has blindly adopted it as the City's. It's a perfect case of special interests tail wagging the dog.

Fix the Mercer Mess, but with an eye towards actually creating efficiencies and distributing traffic better. If the rush is to get this fixed before the Viaduct construction begins so traffic can be distributed, then we need a functioning roadway that creates flexible lane changes for peak hours certain ways (they do this in SF).

Regardless, the bigger point is this is a gross misuse of our Bridging the Gap funds: they deserve to be part of the neighborhood's infrastructure all around the city, not just ONE neighborhood: South Lake Union.
Posted by bonafide on October 2, 2008 at 5:47 PM · Report
3
Another way of looking at it: Mercer's total cost is roughly $200 million. The 15 blocks-ish of new sidewalks built in 2008 cost how much? How much more could we do for non-motorized transportation in this town - peds and bikes alike - if we actually made moving something other than cars a priority?
Posted by John on October 2, 2008 at 5:53 PM · Report
4
That picture of Nick Licata is legitimately freaking me out.
Posted by Mr. Poe on October 7, 2008 at 10:45 AM · Report
5
Let the circle... be unbroken....
Posted by danielbennettkieneker on October 9, 2008 at 6:49 PM · Report
6
The proposed Mercer Street project is a fraud. I don't know how long can Nickles, as well as the city council, can fool the state and the people to get the funding for something that will create even more congestion and dangerous conditions for pedestrians.
The Mercer corridor is connected to the Federal Interstate Highway. What boulevard? What pedestrians?! Who wants to walk there next to idling trucks? It's not a transportation project, it's a real estate project. It's no wander that this project is on the ballot(it is a part of Prop1), because to get a federal dollar a transportation project must show that it will reduce congestion and increase safety, and this project does the opposite. Just like the SLUT, this project will not get people out cars, will create more obstacles for vehicular movements, lures peds into interstate traffic, and offers absolutely no regional transit options for the users of Mercer Street.

The bottom line is , how can you reduce the roadway to 3 lanes in each direction, puncture it with lights, crosswalks, and extra left turns, all on one of the most congested and polluted street in the state?
And how about all those people who will be stuck in traffic? These are struggling people who can't afford to get around any other way.
By the way, Prop 1(that actually will fund the fraudulent Mercer Street project) has no regional transit option for any of the neighborhoods that rely on Mercer to connect to most of the region's meaningful destinations.
This whole thing looks like a real estate deal, which is a fraud.
Posted by mik kacian on November 2, 2008 at 10:44 AM · Report

Add a comment

Most Commented in News

  • Swinging at the Speaker House Speaker Frank Chopp has long pissed off progressives with his plodding, centrist ways. Now they're threatening to run a liberal challenger against him.

  • Ripped Off New ATM Card Screws Poor People

  • Fuck the South A Disgruntled Massachusetts Voter Gets It Off His Chest

  • Debtors Revolt! The Time to Fight Credit Card Companies, Corporate Profits, and Abusive Banks is Now.

  • Friends Stand Charged FSU Members Arrested for Weapons, Drugs Outside Local Club