Into the Vegettoir
A Truth-Seeking Vegetarian Dares to Look His Field Roast in the Eye
All Photos Kelly O
VEGGIE BLOODBATH Field Roast is made, not born.
Near the intersection of 14th Avenue and South Jackson Street sits a brick building that for years served as a Lucerne dairy. Don't let its benign demeanor and folksy history fool you. Every day of the week, truckloads of innocent vegetables are marched inside this slaughterhouse to be smooshed against virtuous grains that want nothing more than to sway in the breeze. Instead, they're butchered, spiced, and reconstructed as a variety of large-link sausages, deli slices, meat loaves, and cutlets known by the name "Field Roast."
Does fennel scream when it's slaughtered? Does the sight of the killing floor cause eggplant to taint itself with fear hormones? An invitation to tour the just-opened Field Roast factory offered the possibility of answers.
Stranger Personals
I arrived on a rainy Wednesday afternoon and was met by a scene that instantly foiled all nightmarish notions. The Buddhist tour guides and hair-netted worker bees attending vats of savory-smelling goo were about as far from shrieking heifers and gory sluices as I could get. This was a relief. I'd lived so far without experiencing the inside of a slaughterhouse, even on film; just reading about abattoir operations had forced me to give up meat long ago. This makes me an integral part of Field Roast's target audience, but "We're not exclusive," says tour guide/owner David Lee, who cofounded the company with his brother Richard in 1997. Their dream: to create vegan delicacies so tasty, even carnivores would crave them.
These delicacies and the whole of the Field Roast empire are built upon "a blend of European and Asian heritage," with the East represented by grain-based vegetable meats invented centuries ago by Buddhist monks, the West by the European charcuterie–styled spicing and treatment of said vegetable meat. The resulting product—a moist, dense, spongy stuff that could be the love child of tofu and pâté—doesn't seek to impersonate meat, according to its creators. "We do nothing to replicate the taste or consistency of animal flesh," Lee says. The most meatlike thing about Field Roast is his insistence on calling it meat. "We're reclaiming the word! We're using it like nut meat: grain meat." Lee is counting on his linguistic relativity gaining traction in the manner of milk. "For decades, milk meant cow milk," says Lee. "Now there are all kinds of milk—rice milk, soy milk—and the same thing can happen with meat."
It's happening. Since the introduction of Field Roast's meat-free meat products into the retail market in 1999, both the product line and the market have expanded annually. The biggest leap forward came this year, when after seven years in a Georgetown warehouse, the company purchased the old Lucerne dairy, giving the lightly dilapidated building a makeover and expanding the staff to 20 office and factory employees. Everyone enters through the same door, a bit of worker- uniting feng shui that leads past the factory's multidenominational shrine (Buddhist/ Christian/Wiccan/what-have-you).
I've eaten Field Roast before, numerous times, but I had yet to form a concrete opinion of the stuff. I used to love the BBQ Field Roast sandwich at the Elysian; more recently I ordered the Field Roast Reuben there and couldn't finish it. As I imagine is the case with any meat, the appeal of Field Roast is contingent on preparation and personal taste. The Elysian's barbecue sandwich struck me as a rare, semi-indulgent treat, with the thinly sliced, spicy Field Roast meshing with the hot barbecue sauce perfectly; the Reuben landed as a strange, not-quite-there experiment, with the Thousand-Island tang leaving the lightly rubbery Field Roast with the unfortunate aftertaste of a science project. By refusing to impersonate existing foods, Field Roast forsakes the power of culinary nostalgia—few people feel warm fuzzies when presented with a steam-pressed vegetable loaf—instead requiring eaters to develop a taste for something new.
The payoffs can be great. Among the prepared samples at the factory: "Porcini Dijon" Field Roast cutlets, with the attractively spiced slices given extravagantly complementary breaded-and-deep-fried homes. It's something like the deep-fried portobello slices at Georgetown's Jules Maes Saloon, but with the kind of subtle flavor that says "inventive upscale." Also excellent: the white truffle pâté, especially dense and rich with brandy and red wine, which I sampled on bread and nearly swooned—here is a freshly minted food the world (at least the vegetarian world) has been lacking. Coming up short: the spongy Field Roast meat loaf, a cold slice of which sent a science-fair chill up my spine.
I had even better luck at home with the samples of Field Roast products Lee pressed on me on my way out. Best of the bunch: the Mexican Chipotle Field Roast sausage, a superspicy chorizolike creation flavored with smoked chipotle and chili de arbol peppers. It's almost too hot to eat on its own, but placed in the soothing company of fitting Mexi-accoutrements—huevos and queso in the morning, guacamole and sour cream in the evening, all wrapped in tortillas whenever—it's stunningly flavorful and easily kicks the butt of all other veggie-sausage options. Runner-up: the Celebration Roast, a steam-pressed concoction of Field Roast, butternut squash, apples, and mushrooms that redeems its off-putting name through sheer tastiness. A Celebration Roast is patterned on top like a holiday ham, but cutting into the bumpy grayish-brown loaf feels as radically foreign as spooning brains from a monkey skull. But the taste is something new and good, with the floppiness of the Field Roast meat loaf replaced by dense breadiness and fine, light spicing.
The folks behind Field Roast dream of making food so distinctive it
appeals even to meat eaters. I dream of building a time machine to
travel back to 1897 and assassinating Sarah Palin's half-Sasquatch
great-grandfather and wearing his pelt as a coat. Considering the
stubbornness of meat eaters and the difficulties of time travel, it's
likely that these dreams will remain just that. But for vegans and
vegetarians looking to diversify, Field Roast could prove to be the
most beneficial foodstuff option since the
totally-mysterious-but-blessedly-vegetarian "Oriental"-flavored Top
Ramen. ![]()
"Oriental" flavor Top Ramen is vegetarian?
I used to enjoy Field Roast and Tofurky products in great amounts as well, as someone trying to be vegetarian and lower her cholesterol, besides enjoying easy meals--but after several months of this I had chronic joint and muscle pain and stomach upset--which only went away when I cut wheat out of my diet. Unfortunately, these products seem to be loaded with wheat gluten, I imagine to boost the protein, (most of the Field Roast products have them at the top of the ingredients list) and may have triggered an intolerance or allergy. I haven't been tested yet. All I know is that now that I am back on animal products and away from wheat in all its incarnations, I feel much better than I have in a long time, (sorry, pigs and chickens, I TRIED) but have to read labels even more carefully.
My suggestion may be to not overdo the gluten and textured soy products and eat foods closer to their natural state, (lentils, quinoa, etc.) labor intensive as those can be. I do miss the field roast, though and hope they may have a gluten-free version someday in the future.
I enjoy Field Roast faux sausage in moderation; much better than soy isolate veggie dawgs, which have the appeal of play dough. Without obsessing about which is worse, gluten, soy isolate or flesh, I'm glad they're not trying to mimic meat, but wheat gluten (seitan) isn’t something most people can eat every day without feeling ill after a while.
If they take it a step further and start fermenting, they'll have the best of both worlds, a vegan solid that's easily assimilated by humans, while remaining the opposite of Prison Loaf.
Cheers,
AkAmber (former field roast employee)
Field Roast fans should definitely check out Georgetown Liquor Company. They totally use it to perfection.
That's a good fucking argument. It's fucking brilliant. Why, I bet if any of these vegeterrorists had ever TASTED meat, they'd realize that it's good! And if it's good, then how can it be wrong?
At least meat eaters tell you where they stand. With the Nazis. It's these Field Roast traitors that disgust me far more than meat eaters, to tell you the truth.
I guess the secret's out. =P
All people should have a choice whether or not they eat meat. Each person should respect another's decision. If you want a steak, eat one. But don't rub it in a vegetarians face. If you want a Veggie dog, then eat one. But don't go picketing and throwing blood on the nearest meat-eaters door.
The point: Everyone is different and insults aren't going to change that. Opinions are great- but have a little dignity and discuss them intelligently.
Oh, and fuck you "fake meat is retarded" person, you are a moron. Whatever anyone eats is their own business.
I don't know why I'm not allowed to compare someone who isn't sufficiently militant in their opposition to meat with the Vichy French. Why can't I compare animal slaughter to the Holocaust? If I can't be insulting and outrageous on the Internet, then where can I be insulting and outrageous?
And maybe I'm not trying to change minds. Would you try to change Hitler's mind?
i may be morally against killing animals in order to eat them/clothe myself, but there are some things humans crave, and meat/meatlike substances are one of those things. to compare the fact that centuries of evolution make us want meat because it used to be a requirement for survival (and now is completely unnecessary, thus affording us the luxury of being vegetarian/vegan) to the non-evolutionarily-backed desire for kiddie porn is rather ridiculous. sorry. field roast allows vegetarians to approximate childhood memories and tactile experiences they can't get elsewhere. unfortunately, the closest my budget gets me to fake meat is lentils, but i'm okay with that ;-)
Second, no, I don't drink soy "milk."
Third. What the fuck is "non-evolutionarily-backed desire for kiddie porn"? I would love to hear your vulgar interpretation of evolutionary theory, and how it supports whatever it is you're saying. Because calling the comparison between fake meat and fake kiddie porn "ridiculous" does not constitute an argument.
On the oriental flavor Top Ramen issue, until recently (within the last year) it listed beef broth as an ingredient, but that has now mysteriously disappeared from the list on the package.
As for pain and suffering of animals? I'm sure it's painful and they suffer, but I'll be honest and say that I'm too self-centered to care about them. I don't really care much about humans either, as I'm sure many of them don't care about me. I guess if I really felt bad about the suffering of the animals, I'd be vegetarian too, but I just don't. If they were above us on the evolutionary ladder, they'd probably be doing the same stuff and having the same moral dilemmas (or lack of).
Call me heartless or selfish or whatever, doesn't matter, I can live with that. I just like meat too much to care if the cows are suffering.
Really? You're okay with that? I give you credit for admitting your wrong doings, but to be content with them is really sad. It's as if you've just given up.
Also saddening is how an article on food that is a positive, healthy option and which avoids contributing to the suffering of animals will always draw such negativity. Filed Roast, and other makers of meat alternatives, are just trying to make the world a little better. Why do folks have to get so defensive? No one is MAKING you like Field Roast. No one is even making you like PEOPLE who EAT Field Roast.
For those who have allergies to wheat, look in to NAET. It's a technique that eliminated my food allergies, especially those to wheat, tomato, and cheese. I eat pizza now.
As a meat-eating woman who often spends days and weeks eating vegetarian cuisine, I think there is a balance that can be struck between making responsible choices (i.e. making local, organic, and as often as possible "whole animal" purchases) with meat eating and also enjoying incredibly tasty fruits, vegetables, and grains readily at our disposal.
Meat eaters and vegetarians alike, buy local goods if you really want to reduce the effects of global warming!
It's just food, and it's food made without animal products, how is that immoral? It's not immoral to eat "fake meat" because if you look at it from a different perspective you could consider "fake meat" as a way to introduce non-vegetarians into vegetarian options in a form that they may try and like because it is meat-like....which I'm pretty sure was a point brought up in the article - that even non-vegetarians would like the food.
There is nothing immoral about it because it doesn't have dead animal in it and THAT is the freaking difference.
And kiddie porn = fake meat? Really?
I don't know if I can say I've "given up" since I never really tried to fight my meat-eating impulses in the first place. I think I'm just more cynical and/or realistic in my belief that the world is pretty cruel and heartless and most (all?) people are selfish. That doesn't mean I'm not happy... I usually am. But I just don't try to change what I don't think CAN be changed.
Also, yes, this positive article did bring out some defensiveness... but that's what makes things exciting! If everyone agreed on it all, then there'd be no discussion.
Totally second the spiciness of those chorizo sausages - HOOO boy! But GOOD!
And as far as carnivores not wanting to eat vegan fare: most of the time if I don't tell them it's vegan they'll eat it happily and ask for more. It's only when I give them a heads up they're getting a vegan meal that they baulk. Interesting, no?
Vegetarianism, which has been a "trend" for thousands of years, has indeed experienced a recent surge of popularity. This does not mean it will soon decrease again. (The Civil Right's movement, in the 1960s, had a tremendous surge in popularity that seems to have been pretty much permanent). I credit 1)more information about the inhumane tactics of animal husbandry 2)increased availability of items such as "field roast" and "boca burgers," and 3)the involvement of younger people, whose enthusiasm, idealism, and general sexiness encourage everyone to climb on board.
This is good. I never discredit, argue against, or otherwise put down meat eaters, but they constantly do so to me. Why is that? Why the anger? Why do some flesh masticators feel so threatened by vegetarianism? Why do so many people APOLOGIZE for their meat eating when they learn I do not eat it? ("My doctor told me I really need the protein;" "I tried it but I got so weak!" "I totally could be a vegetarian. I don't even really like red meat.")Guilt is the reason. In time, public policy will support the morally upright choice. It will all be balanced in the end.
It is so much better than tofurky, which tastes like a terrible, chemical mistake.
Tasty, filling, wonderful vegetarian (and vegan) products. Finally!








RSS
Comments (44) RSS