You weren't rude at all. I was just saying "Hey!" because the title taken out of context is as you rightly point out is lit-geeky in the extreme.
The short title of the reading is: "Why would I lie?" An essayist named Tim Elhajj and I both tell really short stories that seem/are true. Tim has an essay here:
http://tinyurl.com/whywouldilie.
I don't know if I think (as Paul seems to be half-joking here in his post) if Seattle is too small for multiple bookfest. The fact is Seattle seems to have constant bookfests going on. On the Esoteric Book Conference was in mid-Sept. Last weekend was the Antiquarian Bookfest. Next weekend is the Anarchist Book Festival, and now there is the new Seattle Book Fest. I am glad the organizers of the festival were as ambitious as they were to attempt to pull of a festival in the monolithic spirit of Wordstock (in Portland) or the old, defunct NW Bookfest. But those events had sponsors, and in this case there is just two people in Columbia City who said they wanted to hold a book fest.
In many ways it is probably better they didn't achieve something on the scale of the NW Bookfest, which was a good thing to have (in theory) but kind of chilly in execution. It seemed too huge and unwieldy for its own good. People complained the first year about how cold (in temperature) it was in Pier 48, and then waxed nostalgic for Pier 48 every year thereafter.
As a matter of scale, there isn't a single out of town name such as Normal Mailer or John Updike who will read. [Although last week there was in Seattle Margaret Atwood, Annie Proulx, and Sherman Alexie.] Instead it is all local authors, but it is kind of handy to have them all on one bill, I think. I go to a lot of readings but there will be a lot of people I've never seen such as Staphanie Kallos, Eric Liu, Midge Raymond, Pete Dexter, and William Dietrich. And there are a lot of readers I have seen and would like to see again. It seems kind of okay to me that is local.