A place for Canadians.

Dirtclustit
report this user

Bio

I live in Oregon, home of some of the dumbest journalists ever, second only Warshington… more »

TMI

  • Dan Savage or Charles Mudede
Dirtclustit leaving.
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Give Up Already.
@ 38



most couples never make it through the transition to non-monogamy without doing irreparable damage thanks to bunk advice given by all the self-help relationships gurus that hold the same bullshit opinions as Dan


Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Give Up Already.
well for one, LavaGirl, I don't believe you are clueless as to my disgust with piece of shit journalists or anyone loyal to the hive mentality or the idiot swarm (I read your blog)



but besides being gaslight on a scale that went viral by piece of shit sect of assholes who I won't tie with common threads because the common thread is one that doesn't need anymore negative press



yet that is beside the point



Dan and sloggers aren't pushing for equality, they are the other side of the bigots fence, and in the same way the right wing zealots like the anon ignorant commentor whirl wind, rather than addressing the real issue, he and sloggers take the punk ass route and attribute it to the failure of monogamy



it is NOT an issue of monogamy vs non-monogamy, and when it's painted as such a picture and you direct the asshole letter writer into to "how to deal with non-monogamy" all you end up with are spouses who like each other about as much as your worst liked roommate



if that's the type of non-monogamy the letter writer wants, that's his choice, but rather than a bunch of journalist assholes invading peoples lives to use as fodder for their anti-religion anti-monogamy agenda, as opposed to helping LGBTQ family rights and the rights of poly people, not only do you change the story to better fit the agenda, but the only reason Dan published it was because he could point out that monogamy has failed.



fuck that, you don't need to influence other peoples decision or shame what works for them in order to justify your choice,



You don't need to justify your choices to anyone and nobody has to understand why you choose your choice, the worst thing those fucking assholes from the right wing fooled the assholes like Dan into believing, is that you need to not have a choice in order to live as a homosexual and for your life to be "OK"



it doesn't fucking matter, it's no wrong to choose to be gay or bisexual, or assexual, you don't even have to use one of their labels and Dan is one of the assholes who believes it's his right to tell people what their "real" sexual orientation is



fuck him, and you and anybody else who tries to overstep their rights and intrude on the rights of an individual



Especially fuck those whom are the reason this battle for equality will have to begin all over again in the meta world of electronic lives. Slog is just as bad as the worst online adware, spyware, personal space invading web admins to ever administrate a hosted website.



If he gave a shit about the rights of others who would surely respect the rights of others that he chooses to exercise



he is no respector of rights, he is a fucking asshole, and no offense, but nearly all of you dumb mother fuckers are (no respector of rights)


More...
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Give Up Already.
fuck you slog
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Give Up Already.
The problem isn't deciding what type of relationships are right or wrong, the problem is NOT a monogamy vs non-monogamy, as both are valid choices and both choices should not have to put up with disrespectful bullshit from mr sass and mr asshole



the problem is with dip shits like the letter writer believing that the way he is treating his partner can somehow still be justify himself believing he loves his partner. That is not the way you treat someone you supposedly love, for fucks sake his behavior does not even qualify for the level of respect that needs be shown to those you do not love in terms of metamours in different styles of non-monogamy



His speech sounds just as ignorant as the classic seattle ignorant shit advice advice/IT violators give/invade
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Give Up Already.
The problem isn't deciding what type of relationships are right or wrong, the problem is a monogamy vs non-monogamy, as both are valid choices and both choices should not have to put up with disrespectful bullshit from mr sass and mr asshole



the problem is with dip shits like the letter writer believing that the way he is treating his partner can somehow still be justify himself believing he loves his partner. That is not the way you treat someone you supposedly love, for fucks sake his behavior does not even qualify for the level of respect that needs be shown to those you do not love in terms of metamours in different styles of non-monogamy



His speech sounds just as ignorant as the classic seattle ignorant shit advice advice/IT violators give/invade
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on What Are the Parallels Between Birth Control and PrEP?.
fuck the hive mentality, anybody who thinks that the virus that causes aids has quickly become resistant to drug treatment or as ignoramouslash puts it



"...medication non-compliance (lower effective dose at any given time) results in selective pressure towards resistance..."



not only has a fatally flawed understanding of the many mechanisms that are the actions in how medicines work, but he doesn't understand basic principles of evolution such a Dawkins understanding of evolution which is little more than the few plagiarised half-truths Darwin used to claim his fame
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on What Are the Parallels Between Birth Control and PrEP?.
Holy shit venomlash is one total fucking ignorant about virology, diseases, and evidently pathogens in general



just goes to show you how dangerous one or two facts can be for a person who doesn't really know the difference between one regurgitated fact and actual knowledge of a subject
Nov 15 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Saying It.
some people are just plain cold and prefer a living a life as if their heart is frozen. It doesn't surprise me that here at the stranger -- the place that is a magnet for the heartless and the journalists that perpetuate a cold blooded world -- it's common for sloggers to make be-little people or make fun of someone's circumstances no matter how serious the subject is under the bullshit excuse that people shouldn't take themselves so seriously



I am not sure which is worse, because it all depends on who you are and the life you choose to live, letter writer, but a person so bitter that they cannot tell their partners of a year that they love them, or a person whom it makes them feel they are going to throw up when they witness others do it/say it. Either way, it is a pretty deal letter writer, not to say that you two cannot get past it, you can, so long as you don't take an ignorant approach to it as seemed so popular in the letters the other day (the one wherein all these advanced humanists of elevated intelligence claim that a 19 year old isn't mature enough to not act awkward upon meeting her boyfriend's ex, when the truth is that the 19 year old may well be light years ahead of this highly evolved [sic] non-monogamous mind fucking violators, that it could perhaps be that some situations are always awkward and their just phases that there is no other way then to keep going forward until they become comfortable around each other and that those first unavoidable awkward moments are not at all helped when some cold hearted seattlite doesn't give a fuck about people other than themselves or is just an asshole in general and instead of writing about the real problem at hand, takes the coward passive aggressive way out and uses the poorly disguised and subtle veiled metaphor of having "cancer")



Some people -- mostly men dear letter writer -- will always take the easy way out and will never choose to come to resolution when the convenience of denial presents itself. The bad news is that such a piss poor convenient lie to live will always be a choice, and people will always choose that route, however it doesn't mean that you do not have a choice dear letter writer



don't go with the crowd on these issues as too many people become so blinded by their seemingly minor choices to choose ignorance, and you may not ever recognize the truths of this world no matter how clearly they exist, it isn't good to become sickened at the site of people with too warm of hearts



a good indicator of the level your heart has thawed is to watch the movie "Joe the King" towards the end a young boy barely in his teens is just about to eat a extravagant and delicious meal that contains all of his favorite foods, a "true feast", however right as he is about to dig in, he witnesses how a family acts that doesn't treat each other like pieces of shit (AKA how a loving family treats it's members) and the boy get literally sick to his stomach



if witnessing that moment of the movie doesn't pull at your strings to see that fear of love or loving -- even in regards to simply stating it -- is not a good thing, esp if you are stupid enough to let cattle's opinion from seattle influence your view of it, and suddenly you'll realize why so many seattlite bloggers and sloggers are such assholes, it isn't fun to live a life with a dead or frozen heart, people who live like that are too stupid to understand that the innocent child is light years more mature than them, that in fact the characteristics they claim to signify "maturity" is actually a lie in which they believe to become less and less humane equal greater and greater level of maturity



which is a crock of shit no matter what flawed label they use to restrict your freedom to live your life under the bullshit guise of a concept, commonly known as your "sexual orientation"


More...
Nov 13 Dirtclustit commented on Should the Duggar Girls #FuckFirst?.
I wasn't sure that Dan meant "fuckfirst" as in the journalistic fuck, as in not only completely invading all aspects of privacy, but also to post about it.



I am not so good a understanding what dickheaded journalist speak brazenly says just underneath the surface, but your highlighted quotes do a great job of illustrating that he did in fact, mean fuck their privacy.



and yes, Tessisee, when a journalist crew is on a "fucking" mission, you do have to be eveready to come to the assistance of some asshole getting caught "fucking" a joe public person



you don't have to be a slut to enjoy "fucking" a persons private space, you have to be one seriously fucked up lowlife who views themselves above the peasant commoners whom they have no respect



Just because a person or family puts themselves on a reality TV show, like Dan's fictional fucking family -- but even if they did exist -- that will never justify the invasions of privacy that a journalistic "fucking" entails.



If you can't see how every "point" Dipshit made is either taken out of context or else "not" what the fictional Duggard said, you are an idiot



"Duggard women don't get headaches" does not equal Duggard women can no longer not consent to being fucked



unless of course you mean being fucked by journalists, but speaking of journalists and the fucking they do, the victim's right to decline being fucked is never respected, in fact it only makes the fucking more pleasureable for the low lifes because then they get to rub their noses in it. Journalists don't get off on fucking someone's privacy when the victim is oblivious to their invasions
More...
Nov 12 Dirtclustit commented on SL Letter of the Day: Pain Can't Be Avoided.
oh I forgot how sloggers prefer to have discussions; don't mention anything directly so that you'll never have to be responsible for any opinion you might have stated in the discussion once it becomes a discussion that took place in the past.



So some readers might not understand the concept of desired pain and the exchanges of desired pain that is consented to, as that type of pain (desired and consented) is part of a healthy relationships and power exchanges



but it wouldn't be a slog article without intentionally phrasing questions in a way that uses subtlety to target non-BDSM readers that make the mistake of chiming in



relationships do not have to include undesired pain, you should never inflict undesired pain, and while it may be done inadvertently, when you genuinely care about the person you are in a relationship with and are sorry for inadvertently inflicting pain, most people don't become stuck in that pain



sorry means your are willing to change the behavior



if the letter writer is sorry, than there shouldn't be a problem, and if it becomes a problem, the root of it my stem from the people you surround yourself with, do they refer to a deleted web page as suicide, while knowing you would understand it to mean the end of physical life of the body a person dwells in? Do you know of your misunderstanding yet choose to berate and belittle you after you took their words for the meaning they intended for you?



If "friends" intend to miscommunicate, it's an action that can be parsed down to lying piece of shit manipulator, not recognizing that has a tendency to become confused enough to think that any form of suicide is an acceptable action to take



and that's sad, I think the letterwriter will do fine if they do not intentionally miscommunicate
More...
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy