May 7, 2011
commented on SL Letter of the Day: One Word
@14 - But at least 3 of them were conceived after just one sexual encounter! So they hardly count at all! Right?
Heartbroken, if the message hasn't got through yet - run so fast you leave scorchmarks and a Roadrunner dust trail. NOW.
Feb 7, 2011
commented on UK Court "Bans" Man With Low IQ From Having Sex
Well, the original story is from the UK's Daily Mail, which is notorious for shading facts and even outright lying to fit its agenda, so I'd prefer to find out a bit more about the case before jumping up and down and shrieking.
And as I understand it an IQ of 48 is pretty serious mental retardation, though it depends on what scale they're using to measure it. But since he's got this "inappropriate" sex drive it's surely better that he express it with a steady partner, unless there's something shady or abusive going on that the news outlets didn't bother to mention.
Jan 21, 2011
commented on SL Letter of the Day: She Who Will Not Be Ignored
Every man who that has come into my life AFTER him knew about him and knew that if he ever came back for me, I was gone.
So why hasn't she?
EEEEE the drama EEEEE the excitement EEEEE it's so exciting how everyone wants me EEEEE how dare anyone ignore me!
Yeah, it's the kids I feel sorry for. Whichever parent they end up with - the serial cheater and drama addict or the one who lets same walk all over him.
Nov 24, 2010
commented on SL Letter of the Day: Pedo Or No?
@71: It's not the orientation; it's acting on the orientation. If Dan acts on his, his potential sexual partners are legally capable of deciding for themselves whether to say yes. If a paedophile acts on theirs, their potential sexual partners aren't.
Bigoted hypocritical prick yourself.
Nov 10, 2010
commented on Savage Love
Maybe the lubeless wonder or the gigantopenis are allergic to lube? But in that case, just use another kind.