GoodOmens
Canada
report this user
Apr 11, 2016 GoodOmens commented on Required Reading for Americans During Tax Week.
@6 and @14 Thank you for saying exactly what I wanted to say to that @1 moron.
'it couldn't happen here' because you chose to not make it happen, not for any other reason.
Apr 1, 2016 GoodOmens commented on Required Viewing: Rachel Maddow on Donald Trump, the GOP, Abortion, and the Media's Big Blind Spot.
Everybody read #7 again. Do it. It's important.
Mar 23, 2016 GoodOmens commented on Man In Tree: My Best Guess.
My new best bet: it was a photo meant to be representational only, referencing an incident only those in Seattle would know about without any further explanation. I found this article, and it may explain what's going on here.
http://www.citylab.com/work/2016/03/seat…
Mar 23, 2016 GoodOmens commented on Man In Tree: My Best Guess.
Does anybody else not see anybody in those trees??
Mar 3, 2016 GoodOmens commented on WaPo: "Researchers have found strong evidence that racism helps the GOP win".
Wait wait wait.
1 in 20 democrats oppose interracial dating and 32% of democrats "agree with negative statements about blacks such as the one about slavery and discrimination" wtf!?!? that's way higher than I expected!
Canadian Slog reader take-away: The usa progressives aren't very progressive. Wow.
Feb 24, 2016 GoodOmens commented on Savage Love Letter of the Day: Meth Practices.
Sounds to me like LW2 is unnecessarily antagonistic / aggressive. Maybe it's all the meth they're on?
Feb 18, 2016 GoodOmens commented on On Oxytocin, Pseudoscientific Views, and Rightwing Radio Hosts.
The degree of self-delusion on the part of these folks with 'purity' agendas is really mind boggling.
Dec 14, 2015 GoodOmens commented on Savage Love Letter of the Day: What Speech Was That?.
@9, I like your analogy. Bi and sleeping around is the same as straight and sleeping around if you've made a monogamous commitment.
Dec 14, 2015 GoodOmens commented on Savage Love Letter of the Day: What Speech Was That?.
@4,6,10, adding to the consensus. I am also bi and monogamous. Pretty much posting to say exactly what 10 said. Sure I'm attracted to both, but that doesn't mean I need to have sex with both. It's like saying that because a monosexual is attracted to more than one person of the sex they're attracted to, that they need to have sex with them. It just doesn't follow. Sure you may want to, but as Dan has said, monogamy isn't easy for anyone. That's why it's a valuable commitment (if it's something you value)
Nov 2, 2015 GoodOmens commented on Coming Soon: The Anonymous Hack of the KKK.
What Urgutha and Eudaemonic said.