Apr 14
Mr. X commented on
Saturday Morning News.
@21 and Chris Hansen's flack,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the "new" revenue that stadium supporters like to cite only covers the face value of $200 million in bonds (assuming, generously, that returns are as anticipated and that Hansen et al don't come back asking for additional publicly-funded infrastructure and/or to "restructure" their agreement - both of which are VERY likely prospects), and not the interest on that debt. We get to pay that - and that WILL come from other local funding sources that could go to real public needs.
@47,
It's not what Hansen is doing with his money (and don't kid yourself that this is just some altruistic charity deal - he's looking to make a lot of money by rezoning industrial property to build his new "entertainment zone" and whatnot) - it's what he's doing with the public's money.
Apr 13
Mr. X commented on
Yes, Liberals, We Should Sue That Anti-Gay Florist.
What the poster @ 86 said.
I too support the enforcement action, but I have no illusions about the fact that that it will also make for one hell of an effective 30-second TV ad in some swing state where LGBTQ rights are on the ballot.
Apr 2
Mr. X commented on
Council Looks to Kill Some Tall Towers in SLU Proposal.
@20,
Great comment. Too bad the City wrote the proposal to sell the former Bay Freeway properties so that only Vulcan would be considered - you can bet your bippy LIHI would have done a better job creating housing that is actually affordable had the bid criteria not been rigged to rule them out as a buyer.
Apr 2
Mr. X commented on
Council Looks to Kill Some Tall Towers in SLU Proposal.
Hallivulcan bought these properties from the City under the existing zoning, promised to develop them in a certain time period, and were supposed to provide substantial public benefits for the privilege of doing so. They have done nothing but make hundreds of millions in demands from City taxpayers since.
Fuck them. And their apologists.
I was right there with you on up to the part where you said this deal meets the requirements of I-91, because it doesn't.