The NSA/CIA/Edward Snowden Recap
To those who have an active sex life, or are congenitally ignorant, illiterate or aliterate, allow me to review the salient facts of the Snowden Saga:
First, several months back, in a roundabout manner, private data was passed on to the IRS regarding a number of offshore tax havens, also called offshore finance centers.
On May 9, the IRS announced on their web site the largest tax investigation in history to be undertaken to look into those offshore tax havens and US citizens who utilize them.
Several days later, the acting head of the IRS was fired! (One doesn't mess with the super-rich without negative outcomes.)
The highest probability is that this originated with Edward Snowden, or people affiliated with him.
Next, Snowden goes public with the leaking of NSA's domestic and foreign surveillance program called PRISM.
President Obama gives a speech, and over the next day or so another NSA program, Boundless Informant is leaked, giving the lie to Obama's speech and assurances!
Just the other day, Snowden gave an interview where he leaks the hack, or penetration, of a Chinese Exchange Point (EP), or Internet Exchange Point (IXP), which is the physical configuration of switches joining many geographic locations of the Internet (such as the IXP in Seattle, which joins the traffic from Alaska, Northwest Canada, the Pacific Northwest and central United States and southwestern US traffic.
This was a major hack, which could also have allowed further or future hacks to appear to have originated from that Chinese IXP!
I don't claim to have any inside knowledge of either Mr. Snowden, or his activities, past, present or future, but these are awesome leaks of the top level, regardless of what corrupt, moronic and dishonest congressional critters so claim in the USA.
(And we certainly know Gen. Clapper, the DNI with an established history of dishonesty, is not to be believed.)
Naomi Wolfe, who I do indeed have respect for, has questioned the veracity of Edward Snowden and his leaks, citing a monolithic manner in which whistleblowers are supposed behave --- this is a relatively nonsensical statement, as John Kiriakou (CIA whistleblower), Thomas Drake (NSA whistleblower), Cate Jenkins (EPA whistleblower), etc., etc., behaved in rather differing ways, not uniformly following the same, exact pattern.
Interesting links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla…
http://newsroom.fb.com/News/636/Facebook…
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-15…
@11, that was a double-box false document ploy. Had Dan Rather ever been a serious journalist, instead of a multi-million dollar per year teleprompter reader, he would have researched Geo. Weasel Bush's "military record" quite some time ago, before they had doctored everything!
He would have found that in 1968, Bush washed out of USAF enlisted basic training at the four-week point, then returned to Houston were his Daddy Bush pinned officer's bars on his weak shoulders!
There's no record of anyone attesting to have gone through either OTS (Officer Training School) nor flight school (and that's the most rigorous training of all) with Bushie!
Had Rather done his homework, or due diligence, as he should have when Bush first announced for governor of TX, he would never have fallen like he did!
And on the surveillance front, the DNI and NSA director both recently claimed, along with neocon congressional whorescum, that the NSA doesn't do domestic spying......
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-575894…
The National Security Agency has acknowledged in a new classified briefing that it does not need court authorization to listen to domestic phone calls.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler, a New York Democrat, disclosed this week that during a secret briefing to members of Congress, he was told that the contents of a phone call could be accessed “simply based on an analyst deciding that.”