Bio
I really do.
Mar 12
I Hate Screen Names commented on We Can't Make Gay Marriage Legal Because Then Gay People Will Start Having Sex.
I Hate Screen Names commented on We Can't Make Gay Marriage Legal Because Then Gay People Will Start Having Sex.
Quoth @10:
And given that, I think a big part of anti-gay marriage is motivated by resentment. These closet cases can't stop thinking about hot, hot gay buttseks but pushed down their natural urges to have passionless sex with their disappointed wives. They're pissed that guys who aren't such fucking cowards might get all the marriage perks that they sold their souls for.
It would be funny if peoples rights weren't being denied. This is what the argument always comes down to: man on man sex. I'm gay, and I think anti-gay marriage activists spend more time thinking about gay sex than I do.
And given that, I think a big part of anti-gay marriage is motivated by resentment. These closet cases can't stop thinking about hot, hot gay buttseks but pushed down their natural urges to have passionless sex with their disappointed wives. They're pissed that guys who aren't such fucking cowards might get all the marriage perks that they sold their souls for.
Mar 7
I Hate Screen Names commented on Advice Cop: Prudie Blows a Tiny Dick....
I Hate Screen Names commented on Advice Cop: Prudie Blows a Tiny Dick....
FWIW: I don't think Prudie recommended disabled gals as a consolation prize; I think she was using a disabled dating website as means of getting the guy to disclose his micropenis up-front. Rather than getting emotionally invested in a gal who, for whatever reason, cannot be satisfied by a dude with a tiny dick, he can get that concern out of the way immediately. Then he can look forward to the first fucking, like most people, rather than terrified that she'll run off once she sees what he's packing. And that terror is obviously a liability: even if she's cool with a small dick, his fear likely makes him shit in bed.
So the core of the advice was good. Where Prudie choked is in her choice of implementation: a disabled dating website. My guess is that Prudie thought such sites are more amendable to people being honest about their physical shortcomings-- but really, everyone should do this as a matter of course anyway. If you're 4'6'' or you weigh over 400 lbs, that's probably something you should let potential dates know right away. Hell, you should do that with any potential deal-breaker, e.g. smoking, religion, political affiliation, etc. Saves everyone's time.
More...
So the core of the advice was good. Where Prudie choked is in her choice of implementation: a disabled dating website. My guess is that Prudie thought such sites are more amendable to people being honest about their physical shortcomings-- but really, everyone should do this as a matter of course anyway. If you're 4'6'' or you weigh over 400 lbs, that's probably something you should let potential dates know right away. Hell, you should do that with any potential deal-breaker, e.g. smoking, religion, political affiliation, etc. Saves everyone's time.
Feb 27
I Hate Screen Names commented on "Why does he have boobs?".
I Hate Screen Names commented on "Why does he have boobs?".
@68: It's not stupid; it's efficient. The machine is looking for variances from "typical" body shapes-- those variances are more thoroughly investigated as potential contraband. If the machine were unisex, it would need to fully scan boobs and junk, and/or flag that area for careful review by the human user (which raises its own issues). With the gender selection, the machine can safely ignore cylinder-shaped items in males' crotch areas, and conical-shaped items in females' chest areas.
The gender identification doesn't prevent terrorism; it makes the "prevention" (such as it is) more streamlined.
As for the perils of "that situation"-- I have difficulty mustering sympathy for those who choose to swim against the current (which is good) yet complain about the inconvenience. Well, duh. Of course it's easier to conform: that's why most people do so.
The gender identification doesn't prevent terrorism; it makes the "prevention" (such as it is) more streamlined.
As for the perils of "that situation"-- I have difficulty mustering sympathy for those who choose to swim against the current (which is good) yet complain about the inconvenience. Well, duh. Of course it's easier to conform: that's why most people do so.
Feb 26
I Hate Screen Names commented on "Why does he have boobs?".
I Hate Screen Names commented on "Why does he have boobs?".
I'm not sure I understand Ms. Higgins's issue. If you're going to challenge gender assumptions (which is a good thing), then you have to expect that some people will be confused by your gender.
When I was much younger and prettier, I occasionally wore dresses or skirts just because. Since I also had long hair (and as it turns out, beautiful eyelashes), people would sometimes mistake me for a woman. This never bothered me: the whole point of wearing dresses/skirts was to challenge their "female only" designation. If it were so very very important to me that everyone immediately know I was a dude, I would have cut my hair, grown a beard, and stuck with jeans.
When I was much younger and prettier, I occasionally wore dresses or skirts just because. Since I also had long hair (and as it turns out, beautiful eyelashes), people would sometimes mistake me for a woman. This never bothered me: the whole point of wearing dresses/skirts was to challenge their "female only" designation. If it were so very very important to me that everyone immediately know I was a dude, I would have cut my hair, grown a beard, and stuck with jeans.
Feb 21
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Salad Tossers.
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Salad Tossers.
@4: No kidding. Like just about everyone on the planet, I eat using the same hands I wipe my ass with. I don't see the logic that finds mouths (or cocks, or pussies, or asses) "contaminated" but finds our hands virgin-pure.
Feb 20
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Bonus Advice for DUD.
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Bonus Advice for DUD.
Even though I can freely date people now, I'll never be able to be fifteen and go on a date, and that's something that I'll never quite get over.I'm straight and I didn't go on any dates when I was fifteen. It's not that big a loss.
Feb 5
I Hate Screen Names commented on Savage Love.
I Hate Screen Names commented on Savage Love.
To AT: If you're serious about wanting to cum from oral, there's an expedient solution. Just stop having vaginal sex and stop masturbating. After a week or two of no orgasms at all, your dick will explode if she breathes on it.
You can also try a variant: have vaginal sex where you aren't allowed to move at all. Tell her she can tease you as much as she wants-- slowing down or stopping when you're getting close, etc. The resultant orgasm should teach your dick that no control can be pretty hot.
You can also try a variant: have vaginal sex where you aren't allowed to move at all. Tell her she can tease you as much as she wants-- slowing down or stopping when you're getting close, etc. The resultant orgasm should teach your dick that no control can be pretty hot.
Feb 5
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Rocky Mountain Rainbows.
I Hate Screen Names commented on SL Letter of the Day: Rocky Mountain Rainbows.
@46: Thanks! The reversal on squeeing straights is part of what I was going for.
@49: I wouldn't say cumming on a girl is how sex normally ends, but it's not abnormal. Cumming in a girl may not be an option, and some gals won't go down on a guy who is covered in her vaginal secretions. Which leaves cumming on her the next-best option.
I will be dismayed if facials become normal, though.
@49: I wouldn't say cumming on a girl is how sex normally ends, but it's not abnormal. Cumming in a girl may not be an option, and some gals won't go down on a guy who is covered in her vaginal secretions. Which leaves cumming on her the next-best option.
I will be dismayed if facials become normal, though.
The Stranger
RSSSeattle Art & Performance Quarterly
A complete guide to Seattle's current art, film, dance, and theater season.
Facebook
Twitter
(1, 0) would correspond to a "pure" homosexual
(0, 1) would correspond to a "pure" heterosexual
(1, 1) would correspond to a "pure" bisexual
(0, 0) would correspond to a "pure" asexual
Between the box bounded by those points lies all of humanity. E.g. a bisexual that was only sexually interested in the same sex would be (0.5, 1), an asexual that thought cuddling with the opposite sex was kinda fun might be (0, 0.2), etc.
My guess is that the letter-writer is somewhere around (0.2, 1), i.e. only sexually interested in dudes under a particular set of circumstances, and interested in women for romance/sex.