So, if you shoot your own baby dead, NBD, nothing to see here; it was an accident.
Yet, and rightfully so, a man who "squoze" his 6 week old's head in the crook of his arm is arrested.
Hmm. Something fucked up here. Like that Lund, Sweden judge who ruled that, though the evidence showed the man violently raped the woman, the man didn't INTEND to rape her, so NBD, nothing to see here.
By that logic, every defendant ever can just claim the consequences of their actions were not their intent and so they are therefore not guilty: the father who "squoze" his baby's head only intended to stop his crying, not to injure or possibly kill him, so NBD, nothing to see here. Why, then, was he arrested? Indeed, why arrest anyone who does not admit to desiring the result of their actions?
Logic fail all over the place.